Consonant lengthening marks the beginning of words across a diverse sample of languages.
Journal
Nature human behaviour
ISSN: 2397-3374
Titre abrégé: Nat Hum Behav
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Sep 2024
24 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
20
12
2023
accepted:
14
08
2024
medline:
25
9
2024
pubmed:
25
9
2024
entrez:
24
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Speech consists of a continuous stream of acoustic signals, yet humans can segment words and other constituents from each other with astonishing precision. The acoustic properties that support this process are not well understood and remain understudied for the vast majority of the world's languages, in particular regarding their potential variation. Here we report cross-linguistic evidence for the lengthening of word-initial consonants across a typologically diverse sample of 51 languages. Using Bayesian multilevel regression, we find that on average, word-initial consonants are about 13 ms longer than word-medial consonants. The cross-linguistic distribution of the effect indicates that despite individual differences in the phonology of the sampled languages, the lengthening of word-initial consonants is a widespread strategy to mark the onset of words in the continuous acoustic signal of human speech. These findings may be crucial for a better understanding of the incremental processing of speech and speech segmentation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39317792
doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01988-4
pii: 10.1038/s41562-024-01988-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : SE 1949/3-1
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : SE 1949/5-1
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Cutler, A. in Lexical Representation and Process (ed. Marslen-Wilson, W.) 342–356 (MIT Press, 1989).
Brent, M. R. Speech segmentation and word discovery: a computational perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 294–301 (1999).
pubmed: 10431183
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01350-9
Mattys, S. L., White, L. & Melhorn, J. F. Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134, 477–500 (2005).
pubmed: 16316287
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.477
Gong, X. L. et al. Phonemic segmentation of narrative speech in human cerebral cortex. Nat. Commun. 14, 4309 (2023).
pubmed: 37463907
pmcid: 10354060
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39872-w
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466, 29–29 (2010).
pubmed: 20595995
doi: 10.1038/466029a
Blasi, D. E., Henrich, J., Adamou, E. & Kemmerer, D. Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 26, 1153–1170 (2022).
pubmed: 36253221
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.015
Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. The Sounds of the World’s Languages (Blackwell, 1996).
Evans, N. & Levinson, S. C. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 32, 429–448 (2009).
pubmed: 19857320
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
Skirgård, H. et al. Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss. Sci. Adv. 9, 6175 (2023).
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg6175
Wedel, A., Ussishkin, A. & King, A. Incremental word processing influences the evolution of phonotactic patterns. Folia Linguist. 53, 231–248 (2019).
doi: 10.1515/flih-2019-0011
Norris, D., Mcqueen, J. M., Cutler, A. & Butterfield, S. The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cogn. Psychol. 34, 191–243 (1997).
pubmed: 9466831
doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0671
Kingston, J. Lenition. In Selected Proc. 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (eds Colantoni, L. & Steele, J.) 1–31 (Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2008).
Lavoie, L. M. Consonant Strength: Phonological Patterns and Phonetic Manifestations (Routledge, 2015); https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826423
Katz, J. Lenition, perception and neutralisation. Phonology 33, 43–85 (2016).
doi: 10.1017/S0952675716000038
Topintzi, N. Onsets: Suprasegmental and Prosodic Behaviour Cambridge Studies in Linguistics Vol. 125 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750700
Easterday, S. Highly Complex Syllable Structure: A Typological and Diachronic Study (Language Science Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3268721
Paschen, L., Fuchs, S. & Seifart, F. Final lengthening and vowel length in 25 languages. J. Phon. 94, 101179 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101179
Kentner, G., Franz, I., Knoop, C. A. & Menninghaus, W. The final lengthening of pre-boundary syllables turns into final shortening as boundary strength levels increase. J. Phon. 97, 101225 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101225
Fletcher, J. in The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences 2nd edn (eds Hardcastle, W. J. et al.) 521–602 (Blackwell, 2010); https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317251.ch15
Klatt, D. H. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 1208–1221 (1976).
pubmed: 956516
doi: 10.1121/1.380986
White, L., Benavides-Varela, S. & Mády, K. Are initial-consonant lengthening and final-vowel lengthening both universal word segmentation cues? J. Phon. 81, 100982 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100982
Quené, H. Durational cues for word segmentation Dutch. J. Phon. 20, 331–350 (1992).
doi: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30638-2
Fougeron, C. & Keating, P. A. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3728–3740 (1997).
pubmed: 9193060
doi: 10.1121/1.418332
Cho, T. Prosodic boundary strengthening in the phonetics–prosody interface. Lang. Linguist. Compass 10, 120–141 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12178
Cho, T. & McQueen, J. M. Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. J. Phon. 33, 121–157 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.01.001
White, L. Communicative function and prosodic form in speech timing. Speech Commun. 63-64, 38–54 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2014.04.003
Souza, R. in Prosodic Boundary Phenomena (eds Schubö, F. et al.) 35–86 (Language Science Press, 2023); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7777469
White, L. English Speech Timing: A Domain and Locus Approach. PhD thesis, Univ. Edinburgh (2002); https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/23256
Seifart, F., Paschen, L. & Stave, M. Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/NKL.7CBFQ779
Paschen, L. et al. Building a time-aligned cross-linguistic reference corpus from language documentation data (DoReCo). In Proc. 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (eds Calzolari, N. et al.) 2657–2666 (European Language Resources Association, 2020); https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.324
Winter, B. Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R (Routledge, 2019); https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165547
Vasishth, S. & Nicenboim, B. Statistical methods for linguistic research: foundational ideas—part I. Lang. Linguist. Compass 10, 349–369 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12201
McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020); https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429029608
Gelman, A. et al. Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2013); https://doi.org/10.1201/b16018
Gelman, A. & Tuerlinckx, F. Type S error rates for classical and Bayesian single and multiple comparison procedures. Comput. Stat. 15, 373–390 (2000).
doi: 10.1007/s001800000040
Kruschke, J. K. Rejecting or accepting parameter values in Bayesian estimation. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 1, 270–280 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/2515245918771304
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A. & Lüdecke, D. Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian framework. Front. Psychol. 10, 2767 (2019).
pubmed: 31920819
pmcid: 6914840
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767
Bentz, C. & Ferrer-i-Cancho, R. Zipf’s law of abbreviation as a language universal. In Proc. Leiden Workshop on Capturing Phylogenetic Algorithms for Linguistics (eds Bentz, C., Jäger, G. & Yanovich, I.) 1–4 (Univ. Tübingen, 2016); https://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-10057
Kanwal, J., Smith, K., Culbertson, J. & Kirby, S. Zipf’s law of abbreviation and the principle of least effort: language users optimise a miniature lexicon for efficient communication. Cognition 165, 45–52 (2017).
pubmed: 28494263
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.001
Strunk, J. et al. Determinants of phonetic word duration in ten language documentation corpora: word frequency, complexity, position, and part of speech. Lang. Doc. Conserv. 14, 423–461 (2020).
Stave, M., Paschen, L., Pellegrino, F. & Seifart, F. Optimization of morpheme length: a cross-linguistic assessment of Zipf’s and Menzerath’s laws. Linguist. Vanguard 7, 20190076 (2021).
doi: 10.1515/lingvan-2019-0076
Kruschke, J. K. Bayesian analysis reporting guidelines. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1282–1291 (2021).
pubmed: 34400814
pmcid: 8526359
doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7
Guzmán Naranjo, M. & Becker, L. Statistical bias control in typology. Linguist. Typol. 26, 605–670 (2021).
doi: 10.1515/lingty-2021-0002
Guzmán Naranjo, M. & Mertner, M. Estimating areal effects in typology: a case study of African phoneme inventories. Linguist. Typol. 27, 455–480 (2022).
doi: 10.1515/lingty-2022-0037
Chun, Y. & Griffith, D. A. Spatial Statistics and Geostatistics: Theory and Applications for Geographic Information Science and Technology (Sage, 2013).
Donegan, C. geostan: an R package for Bayesian spatial analysis. J. Open Source Softw. 7, 4716 (2022).
doi: 10.21105/joss.04716
Tiefelsdorf, M. & Boots, B. The exact distribution of Moran’s I. Environ. Plan. A 27, 985–999 (1995).
doi: 10.1068/a270985
Griffith, D. A. A linear regression solution to the spatial autocorrelation problem. J. Geogr. Syst. 2, 141–156 (2000).
doi: 10.1007/PL00011451
Griffith, D. A. & Chun, Y. Some useful details about the Moran coefficient, the Geary ratio, and the join count indices of spatial autocorrelation. J. Spat. Econom. 3, 12 (2022).
Hammarström, H., Forkel, R., Haspelmath, M. & Bank, S. Glottolog v.5.0 (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2024); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10804357
Guzmán Naranjo, M. & Jäger, G. Euclide, the crow, the wolf and the pedestrian: distance metrics for linguistic typology. Open Res. Eur. 3, 104 (2023).
pubmed: 38989155
doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16141.1
Byrd, D. & Krivokapić, J. Cracking prosody in articulatory phonology. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 7, 31–53 (2021).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030920-050033
Norris, D. & McQueen, J. M. Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychol. Rev. 115, 357–395 (2008).
pubmed: 18426294
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357
Byrd, D. & Saltzman, E. The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. J. Phon. 31, 149–180 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0095-4470(02)00085-2
Zec, D. in The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology (ed. Lacy, P.) 161–194 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486371.009
Blevins, J. in Forty Years On: Ken Hale and Australian Languages (eds Simpson, J. et al.) 481–492 (Pacific Linguistics, 2001); https://doi.org/10.15144/PL-512.481
Green, A. D. in The Syllable in Optimality Theory (eds Féry, C. & van de Vijver, R.) 238–253 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497926.010
Miceli, L. & Round, E. Where have all the sound changes gone? Examining the scarcity of evidence for regular sound change in Australian languages. Linguist. Vanguard 8, 509–518 (2022).
doi: 10.1515/lingvan-2021-0094
Marley, A. H. Sound change in Aboriginal Australia: word-initial engma deletion in Kunwok. Linguist. Vanguard 8, 645–659 (2022).
doi: 10.1515/lingvan-2021-0062
Blevins, J. in The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology (eds Honeybone, P. & Salmons, J.) 485–500 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015); https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.006
Sun, Y. & Poeppel, D. Syllables and their beginnings have a special role in the mental lexicon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, 2215710120 (2023).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215710120
Wedel, A., Kaplan, A. & Jackson, S. High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: a corpus study. Cognition 128, 179–186 (2013).
pubmed: 23685207
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002
Wedel, A., Ussishkin, A. & King, A. Crosslinguistic evidence for a strong statistical universal: phonological neutralization targets word-ends over beginnings. Language 95, 428–446 (2019).
doi: 10.1353/lan.2019.0082
Yarkoni, T. The generalizability crisis. Behav. Brain Sci. 45, e1 (2020).
pubmed: 33342451
pmcid: 10681374
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20001685
Winter, B. & Grice, M. Independence and generalizability in linguistics. Linguistics 59, 1251–1277 (2021).
doi: 10.1515/ling-2019-0049
Salesky, E. et al. A corpus for large-scale phonetic typology. In Proc. 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Jurafsky, D., Chai, J., Schluter, N. & Tetreault, J.) 4526–4546 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020); https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.415
Lingua Libri (Wikimédia France, 2020–2023); https://lingualibre.org/wiki/LinguaLibre:Main_Page
Ardila, R. et al. Common voice: a massively-multilingual speech corpus. In Proc. 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (eds Calzolari, N. et al.) 4218–4222 (European Language Resources Association, 2020); https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.520
Hawkins, S. Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. J. Phon. 31, 375–405 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2003.09.006
Kisler, T., Schiel, F. & Sloetjes, H. Signal processing via web services: the use case WebMAUS. In Proc. Digital Humanities (ed. Meister, J. C.) 30–34 (Hamburg University Press, 2012).
Forkel, R. et al. Cross-linguistic data formats, advancing data sharing and re-use in comparative linguistics. Sci. Data 5, 180205 (2018).
pubmed: 30325347
pmcid: 6190742
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.205
Forkel, R. & List, J.-M. CLDFBench: give your cross-linguistic data a lift. In Proc. 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (eds Calzolari, N. et al.) 6995–7002 (European Language Resources Association, 2020); https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.864
Turk, A., Nakai, S. & Sugahara, M. in Methods in Empirical Prosody Research (eds Sudhoff, S. et al.) 1–28 (De Gruyter, 2006); https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110914641.1
Zipf, G. K. The Psycho-biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology (George Routledge & Sons, Houghton, Mifflin, 1935).
Zipf, G. K. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort (Addison-Wesley, 1949).
Sigurd, B., Eeg-Olofsson, M. & Weijer, J. Word length, sentence length and frequency—Zipf revisited. Stud. Linguist. 58, 37–52 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.0039-3193.2004.00109.x
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M. & Raymond, W. D. in Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure (eds Bybee, J. & Hopper, P.) 229 (John Benjamins, 2001); https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.13jur
Gahl, S., Yao, Y. & Johnson, K. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. J. Mem. Lang. 66, 789–806 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H. & Gibson, E. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3526–3529 (2011).
pubmed: 21278332
pmcid: 3048148
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012551108
Evans, N. & Levinson, S. C. The myth of language universals. Behav. Brain Sci. 32, 429–448 (2009).
pubmed: 19857320
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
Bickel, B. Statistical modeling of language universals. Linguist. Typol. 15, 401–413 (2011).
Baayen, H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390–412 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Yu, A. C. L. & Zellou, G. Individual differences in language processing. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 5, 131–150 (2019).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033815
Barth, D. et al. in Doing Corpus-Based Typology with Spoken Language Data: State of the Art (eds Haig, G. et al.) 179–232 (Univ. Hawai’i Press, 2021); http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74661
Anderson, C. et al. A cross-linguistic database of phonetic transcription systems. Yearb. Poznan Linguist. Meet. 4, 21–53 (2018).
doi: 10.2478/yplm-2018-0002
List, J.-M., Anderson, C., Tresoldi, T., Rzymski, C. & Forkel, R. CLTS: Cross-Linguistic Transcription Systems. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10997741 (2024).
Vasishth, S., Nicenboim, B., Beckman, M. E., Li, F. & Kong, E. J. Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences. J. Phon. 71, 147–161 (2018).
pubmed: 30197458
pmcid: 6124675
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.008
Vasishth, S. & Gelman, A. How to embrace variation and accept uncertainty in linguistic and psycholinguistic data analysis. Linguistics 59, 1311–1342 (2021).
doi: 10.1515/ling-2019-0051
Gabry, J., Simpson, D., Vehtari, A., Betancourt, M. & Gelman, A. Visualization in Bayesian workflow. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 182, 389–402 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/rssa.12378
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A. & Gabry, J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat. Comput. 27, 1413–1432 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4
Bürkner, P.-C. brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
Bürkner, P.-C. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. R J. 10, 395–411 (2018).
doi: 10.32614/RJ-2018-017
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).
Seifart, F., Paschen, L., Stave, M., Forkel, R. & Blum, F. CLDF dataset derived from the DoReCo core corpus v1.2.1. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10990565 (2024).
Blum, F., Paschen, L., Forkel, R., Fuchs, S. & Seifart, F. Code accompanying the submission for ‘Consonant lengthening marks the beginning of words across a diverse sample of languages’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11198843 (2024).
Rose, F. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.cbc3b4xr
Ozerov, P. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.0dbazp8m
Cowell, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.36f5r1b6
Griscom, R. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.f77c7m72
Cobbinah, A. Y. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.a332abw8
Vanhove, M. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.edd011t1
Seifart, F. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.6eaf5laq
Quesada, J. D., Skopeteas, S., Pasamonik, C., Brokmann, C. & Fischer, F. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.ebc4ra22
Reiter, S. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.a8f9q2f1
Krifka, M. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.efeav5l9
Ponsonnet, M. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.fae299ug
Däbritz, C. L., Kudryakova, N., Stapert, E. & Arkhipov, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.f09eikq3
Schiborr, N. N. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.9c271u5g
Kazakevich, O. & Klyachko, E. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.5e0d27cu
Franjieh, M. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.02084446
Avanzi, M., Béguelin, M.-J., Corminboeuf, G., Diémoz, F. & Johnsen, L. A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.3520l685
Hellwig, B. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.b93664ml
Harvey, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.a4b4ijj2
Hartmann, I. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.b57f5065
Burenhult, N. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.6a71xp0p
Kim, S.-U. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.06ebrk38
Vydrina, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.d5aeu9t6
Gusev, V., Klooster, T., Wagner-Nagy, B. & Arkhipov, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.cdd8177b
Döhler, C. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.c5e6dudv
O’Shannessy, C. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.7452803q
Bartels, H. & Szczepański, M. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.6c6e4e9k
Haude, K. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.da42xf67
Thieberger, N. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.ba4f760l
Aznar, J. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.2801565f
Garcia-Laguia, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.efea0b36
Haig, G., Vollmer, M. & Thiele, H. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.ca10ez5t
Güldemann, T., Ernszt, M., Siegmund, S. & Witzlack-Makarevich, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.f6c37fi0
Ring, H. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.5ba1062k
Seifart, F. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.ffb96lo8
Witzlack-Makarevich, A., Namyalo, S., Kiriggwajjo, A. & Molochieva, Z. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.fde4pp1u
Xu, X. & Bai, B. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.3db4u59d
Forker, D. & Schiborr, N. N. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.81934177
Wegener, C. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.b74d1b33
Gippert, J. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.9ba054c3
Teo, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.5ad4t01p
Hellwig, B., Schneider-Blum, G. & Ismail, K. B. K. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.eea8144j
Bogomolova, N., Ganenkov, D. & Schiborr, N. N. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.ad7f97xr
Mosel, U. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.9322sdf2
Wichmann, S. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.c50ck58f
Skopeteas, S., Moisidi, V., Tsetereli, N., Lorenz, J. & Schröter, S. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.ac166n10
Schnell, S. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.3e2cu8c4
O’Shannessy, C. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.042dv614
Riesberg, S. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.9d91nkq2
Michaud, A. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.abe65p95
Skopeteas, S. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.9cbb3619
Gipper, S. & Ballivián Torrico, J. in Language Documentation Reference Corpus (DoReCo) v.1.2 (eds Seifart, F. et al.) (Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft & Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS & Université Lyon 2, 2022); https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.7ca412wg