Assessing osteoporosis and bone mineral density through
18F-Sodium fluoride
Bone mineral density
Osteoporosis
PET/CT
Quantitative analysis
Journal
Annals of nuclear medicine
ISSN: 1864-6433
Titre abrégé: Ann Nucl Med
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8913398
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Sep 2024
24 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
11
04
2024
accepted:
17
09
2024
medline:
25
9
2024
pubmed:
25
9
2024
entrez:
24
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The use of In this retrospective study, 199 patients (average age 56 ± 6, comprising 52 males and 147 females) with a history of cancer were analyzed. Each participant underwent both A total of 796 lumbar vertebrae from 199 patients were measured. It was observed that osteoporotic patients had significantly lower This study demonstrates distinct
Identifiants
pubmed: 39317874
doi: 10.1007/s12149-024-01982-w
pii: 10.1007/s12149-024-01982-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Health Commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
ID : Z-C20220815
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine.
Références
Jadvar H, Desai B, Conti PS. Sodium 18F-fluoride PET/CT of bone, joint, and other disorders. Semin Nucl Med. 2015;45:58–65.
doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.07.008
pubmed: 25475379
pmcid: 4258001
Blake GM, ParkHolohan SJ, Cook GJ, Fogelman I. Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. Semin Nucl Med. 2001;31:28–49.
doi: 10.1053/snuc.2001.18742
pubmed: 11200203
Grant FD, Fahey FH, Packard AB, Davis RT, Alavi A, Treves ST. Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:68–78.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037200
pubmed: 18077529
Park PSU, Resto DA, Khurana N, Raynor WY, Werner TJ, Høilund-Carlsen PF, et al. The utility of 18F-NaF-Positron Emission tomography/computed tomograp hy in measuring the metabolic activity of the aging spine : implicatio ns for osteoporosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48:1064–1071.
Sheppard AJ, Paravastu SS, Wojnowski NM, Osamor CC 3rd, Farhadi F, Collins MT, et al. Emerging Role of 18F-NaF PET/computed tomographic imaging in osteoporosis: a potential upgrade to the osteoporosis toolbox. PET Clin. 2023;18:1–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.09.001
pubmed: 36442958
pmcid: 9773817
Prevention and management of osteoporosis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;921.
Morgan EF, Unnikrisnan GU, Hussein AI. Bone mechanical properties in healthy and diseased states. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2018;20:119–43.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121139
pubmed: 29865872
pmcid: 6053074
Clynes MA, Harvey NC, Curtis EM, Fuggle NR, Dennison EM, Cooper C. The epidemiology of osteoporosis. Br Med Bull. 2020;133:105–17.
pubmed: 32282039
Gruenewald LD, Koch V, Martin SS, Yel I, Eichler K, Gruber-Rouh T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative dual-energy CT-based volumetric bone mineral density assessment for the prediction of osteoporosis-associated fractures. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:3076–84.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08323-9
pubmed: 34713330
Wichmann JL, Booz C, Wesarg S, Kafchitsas K, Bauer RW, Kerl JM, et al. Dual-energy CT-based phantomless in vivo three-dimensional bone mineral density assessment of the lumbar spine. Radiology. 2014;271:778–84.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131952
pubmed: 24475863
Brett AD, Brown JK. Quantitative computed tomography and opportunistic bone density screening by dual use of computed tomography scans. J Orthop Translat. 2015;3:178–84.
doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.006
pubmed: 30035056
pmcid: 5986997
Michalski AS, Besler BA, Burt LA, Boyd SK. Opportunistic CT screening predicts individuals at risk of major osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32:1639–49.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05863-0
pubmed: 33566138
Huang K, Feng Y, Liu D, Liang W, Li L. Quantification evaluation of 99mTc-MDP concentration in the lumbar spine with SPECT/CT: compare with bone mineral density. Ann Nucl Med. 2020;34:136–43.
doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01425-x
pubmed: 31768820
Beheshti M, Mottaghy FM, Paycha F, Behrendt FFF, Van den Wyngaert T, Fogelman I, et al.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3138-y
pubmed: 26201825
Kanis JA. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. 2007.
Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1137–41.
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090802
pubmed: 7976495
Wong KK, Piert M. Dynamic bone imaging with 99mTc-labeled diphosphonates and 18F-NaF: me chanisms and applications. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:590–9.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.114298
pubmed: 23482667
Bastawrous S, Bhargava P, Behnia F, Djang DSW, Haseley DR. Newer PET application with an old tracer: role of
doi: 10.1148/rg.345130061
pubmed: 25208282
Frost ML, Moore AE, Siddique M, Blake GM, Laurent D, Borah B, et al. 1⁸F-fluoride PET as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for determining treatment efficacy of bone active agents at the hip: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:1337–47.
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1862
pubmed: 23322666
Assiri R, Knapp K, Fulford J, Chen J. Correlation of the quantitative methods for the measurement of bone uptake and plasma clearance of 18F-NaF using positron emission tomography. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2022;146:110081.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110081
pubmed: 34911006
Ahuja K, Sotoudeh H, Galgano SJ, Singh R, Gupta N, Gaddamanugu S, et al.
doi: 10.2967/jnmt.119.234336
pubmed: 31811067
Jassel IS, Siddique M, Frost ML, Moore AEB, Puri T, Blake GM. The influence of CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone de nsity on quantitative [18F]sodium fluoride PET. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9:201–9.
doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.01.01
pubmed: 30976544
pmcid: 6414779