Appraisal of ChatGPT's responses to common patient questions regarding Tommy John surgery.

Tommy John artificial intelligence patient education

Journal

Shoulder & elbow
ISSN: 1758-5732
Titre abrégé: Shoulder Elbow
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101506589

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 11 03 2024
revised: 20 05 2024
accepted: 20 05 2024
pmc-release: 01 07 2025
medline: 25 9 2024
pubmed: 25 9 2024
entrez: 25 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Artificial intelligence (AI) has progressed at a fast pace. ChatGPT, a rapidly expanding AI platform, has several growing applications in medicine and patient care. However, its ability to provide high-quality answers to patient questions about orthopedic procedures such as Tommy John surgery is unknown. Our objective is to evaluate the quality of information provided by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 in response to patient questions regarding Tommy John surgery. Twenty-five patient questions regarding Tommy John surgery were posed to ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0. Readability was assessed via Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesh Kinkaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Score, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Coleman Liau, and Automated Readability Index. The quality of each response was graded using a 5-point Likert scale. ChatGPT generated information at an educational level that greatly exceeds the recommended level. ChatGPT 4.0 produced slightly better responses to common questions regarding Tommy John surgery with fewer inaccuracies than ChatGPT 3.5. Although ChatGPT can provide accurate information regarding Tommy John surgery, its responses may not be easily comprehended by the average patient. As AI platforms become more accessible to the public, patients must be aware of their limitations.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Artificial intelligence (AI) has progressed at a fast pace. ChatGPT, a rapidly expanding AI platform, has several growing applications in medicine and patient care. However, its ability to provide high-quality answers to patient questions about orthopedic procedures such as Tommy John surgery is unknown. Our objective is to evaluate the quality of information provided by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 in response to patient questions regarding Tommy John surgery.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Twenty-five patient questions regarding Tommy John surgery were posed to ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0. Readability was assessed via Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesh Kinkaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Score, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Coleman Liau, and Automated Readability Index. The quality of each response was graded using a 5-point Likert scale.
Results UNASSIGNED
ChatGPT generated information at an educational level that greatly exceeds the recommended level. ChatGPT 4.0 produced slightly better responses to common questions regarding Tommy John surgery with fewer inaccuracies than ChatGPT 3.5.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Although ChatGPT can provide accurate information regarding Tommy John surgery, its responses may not be easily comprehended by the average patient. As AI platforms become more accessible to the public, patients must be aware of their limitations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39318412
doi: 10.1177/17585732241259754
pii: 10.1177_17585732241259754
pmc: PMC11418706
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

429-435

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Ariana L Shaari (AL)

Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

Adam N Fano (AN)

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Oke Anakwenze (O)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Christopher Klifto (C)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Classifications MeSH