Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections-Online Questionnaire: Status Quo in Central European Urological Management of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection.

Antimicrobial resistance Antimicrobial stewardship Catheter European Guidelines Urinary tract infection

Journal

European urology open science
ISSN: 2666-1683
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Open Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101771568

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2024
Historique:
accepted: 30 08 2024
medline: 25 9 2024
pubmed: 25 9 2024
entrez: 25 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) represent a significant burden in health care and its management is challenging. This study aims to assess and compare central European CAUTIs regarding diagnostics, treatment, and prophylaxis. An anonymized online questionnaire was distributed among urologists in Austria, France, Germany, and Switzerland between January and October 2023, consisting of demographic questions on catheter management and diagnostics, treatment, and prophylaxis of CAUTIs. An analysis was performed per country. Comparisons were done with the Fisher's exact test (statistical significance with Out of 423 participating urologists, most regularly performed catheter changes and managed catheter-related issues, except for French urologists. Swiss urologists tended to change the catheter after a longer interval. In France, a higher estimated number of CAUTIs were observed. Diagnostic symptoms and measures varied significantly between countries. French urologists prescribed more antimicrobials per patient and administered longer treatment regimens. The choice of antimicrobial agents differed notably for nonfebrile and febrile CAUTIs, with cotrimoxazole/nitrofurantoin being common for nonfebrile cases and cephalosporin/amoxicillin for febrile ones. Follow-up protocols were similar among urologists, while prophylactic measures showed variations. CAUTI management varied notably across countries in terms of diagnostics, treatment, and prophylaxis. Discrepancies in antimicrobial therapy could be influenced by local resistance rates; yet, nonrecommended drugs and prolonged regimens, as compared with guideline recommendations, were common. This trend, along with inappropriate diagnostics and prophylaxis, may increase antimicrobial resistance and CAUTI morbidity. This study emphasizes the necessity for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship interventions, and proper training in CAUTI management. In this questionnaire-based study examining the clinical practices for managing urinary tract infections in patients with bladder catheters (CAUTIs), significant disparities were observed among European urologists regarding diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis. These findings underscore the critical need for clear guidelines and comprehensive training in CAUTI management.

Sections du résumé

Background and objective UNASSIGNED
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) represent a significant burden in health care and its management is challenging. This study aims to assess and compare central European CAUTIs regarding diagnostics, treatment, and prophylaxis.
Methods UNASSIGNED
An anonymized online questionnaire was distributed among urologists in Austria, France, Germany, and Switzerland between January and October 2023, consisting of demographic questions on catheter management and diagnostics, treatment, and prophylaxis of CAUTIs. An analysis was performed per country. Comparisons were done with the Fisher's exact test (statistical significance with
Key findings and limitations UNASSIGNED
Out of 423 participating urologists, most regularly performed catheter changes and managed catheter-related issues, except for French urologists. Swiss urologists tended to change the catheter after a longer interval. In France, a higher estimated number of CAUTIs were observed. Diagnostic symptoms and measures varied significantly between countries. French urologists prescribed more antimicrobials per patient and administered longer treatment regimens. The choice of antimicrobial agents differed notably for nonfebrile and febrile CAUTIs, with cotrimoxazole/nitrofurantoin being common for nonfebrile cases and cephalosporin/amoxicillin for febrile ones. Follow-up protocols were similar among urologists, while prophylactic measures showed variations.
Conclusions and clinical implications UNASSIGNED
CAUTI management varied notably across countries in terms of diagnostics, treatment, and prophylaxis. Discrepancies in antimicrobial therapy could be influenced by local resistance rates; yet, nonrecommended drugs and prolonged regimens, as compared with guideline recommendations, were common. This trend, along with inappropriate diagnostics and prophylaxis, may increase antimicrobial resistance and CAUTI morbidity. This study emphasizes the necessity for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship interventions, and proper training in CAUTI management.
Patient summary UNASSIGNED
In this questionnaire-based study examining the clinical practices for managing urinary tract infections in patients with bladder catheters (CAUTIs), significant disparities were observed among European urologists regarding diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis. These findings underscore the critical need for clear guidelines and comprehensive training in CAUTI management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39318970
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.018
pii: S2666-1683(24)00648-7
pmc: PMC11421338
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

63-70

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Auteurs

Emilio Arbelaez (E)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Iris Zünti (I)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Sarah Tschudin-Sutter (S)

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Andreas Zeller (A)

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University Centre for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Florian S Halbeisen (FS)

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Surgical Outcome Research Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Hans-Helge Seifert (HH)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Kathrin Bausch (K)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH