Eosinophilia and Adverse Effects of Dupilumab for Respiratory Indications: A Real-World Setting.

Adverse Effects Asthma Chronic Rhinosinusitis Dupilumab Eosinophilia Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Nasal Polyps

Journal

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
ISSN: 2213-2201
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101597220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 18 06 2024
revised: 05 09 2024
accepted: 13 09 2024
medline: 26 9 2024
pubmed: 26 9 2024
entrez: 25 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Dupilumab has been used with significant benefit in the treatment of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated transient eosinophilia and rare eosinophil-related and other adverse effects. To characterize dupilumab-associated eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count [AEC] ≥ 1.5 x 10 Retrospective chart review of 251 patients on dupilumab for asthma and/or CRSwNP seen at a single institution. Among the 142 patients who had AECs checked before and after treatment, 16 (11.3%) patients had post-treatment eosinophilia, including 11 (7.7%) patients who had new eosinophilia upon dupilumab initiation. Thirteen patients with post-treatment eosinophilia remained on dupilumab, 10 of whom had resolution of eosinophilia. Eosinophil-related adverse effects were rare and cases of eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis (EGPA) were limited to 1 patient with eosinophilia and 1 patient with normal eosinophil levels on systemic steroids. Other adverse effects included arthralgias (13/251, 5.2%), rash (8/251, 3.2%), and conjunctivitis (7/251, 2.8%). All patients with pre-treatment eosinophilia and the majority of patients with post-treatment eosinophilia received significant treatment benefit for their respiratory disease with dupilumab. While dupilumab-associated eosinophilia is seen in a subset of patients, persistent eosinophilia or eosinophil-related adverse effects are rare. Furthermore, treatment benefit on dupilumab despite eosinophilia supports its continued use in both asthma and CRSwNP.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Dupilumab has been used with significant benefit in the treatment of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated transient eosinophilia and rare eosinophil-related and other adverse effects.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To characterize dupilumab-associated eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count [AEC] ≥ 1.5 x 10
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective chart review of 251 patients on dupilumab for asthma and/or CRSwNP seen at a single institution.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among the 142 patients who had AECs checked before and after treatment, 16 (11.3%) patients had post-treatment eosinophilia, including 11 (7.7%) patients who had new eosinophilia upon dupilumab initiation. Thirteen patients with post-treatment eosinophilia remained on dupilumab, 10 of whom had resolution of eosinophilia. Eosinophil-related adverse effects were rare and cases of eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis (EGPA) were limited to 1 patient with eosinophilia and 1 patient with normal eosinophil levels on systemic steroids. Other adverse effects included arthralgias (13/251, 5.2%), rash (8/251, 3.2%), and conjunctivitis (7/251, 2.8%). All patients with pre-treatment eosinophilia and the majority of patients with post-treatment eosinophilia received significant treatment benefit for their respiratory disease with dupilumab.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
While dupilumab-associated eosinophilia is seen in a subset of patients, persistent eosinophilia or eosinophil-related adverse effects are rare. Furthermore, treatment benefit on dupilumab despite eosinophilia supports its continued use in both asthma and CRSwNP.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39322036
pii: S2213-2198(24)00939-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.013
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Sylvia H Li (SH)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Katharine Foster Nehme (KF)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Anna Moshkovich (A)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Lydia Suh (L)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Anna Pawlowski (A)

Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Yasmeen Ali (Y)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Gayatri B Patel (GB)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Fei Li Kuang (FL)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Anju T Peters (AT)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Electronic address: anjupeters@northwestern.edu.

Classifications MeSH