Acceptable outcomes of liver transplantation in uninsured patients under the coverage of a state assistance program.


Journal

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
ISSN: 1527-6473
Titre abrégé: Liver Transpl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 15 04 2024
accepted: 16 09 2024
medline: 26 9 2024
pubmed: 26 9 2024
entrez: 26 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The lack of health insurance is a major barrier in the access to healthcare even in case of life-saving procedures such as liver transplantation (LT). Concerns about worse outcomes in uninsured patients have also discouraged the evaluation and transplantation of patients without adequate health insurance coverage. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes from the largest cohort of uninsured patients who underwent LT with the support of a state payment assistance program (also called charity care). This study included all consecutive patients who underwent LT at a single center from 2002 to 2020. Demographic, clinical, social variables and outcome metrics were collected and compared between insured and uninsured patients. Among a total of 978 LT recipients, 594 had private insurance, 324 government insurance (Medicare/Medicaid), 60 were uninsured and covered under a state charity care program. In the charity care group, there was a higher proportion of Hispanic subjects, single marital status, younger age, and high-MELD score patients. The 1- and 3-year patient survival rates were 89.0% and 81.8% in private insurance patients, 88.8% and 80.1% in government insurance recipients, and 93.3% and 79.6% in those with charity care (p=0.49). There was no difference in graft survival between insured and uninsured patients (p=0.62). The three insurance groups presented similar hospital length-of-stay and 30-day readmission rates. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, uninsured status (charity care) was not associated with worse patient survival (HR:1.23, 95%CI: 0.84-1.80, p=0.29) or graft survival (HR:1.22, 95%CI:0.84-1.78, p=0.29). In conclusion, there was no difference in outcomes after LT between insured and uninsured patients. A charity care program may be an effective tool to mitigate socio-economic disparities in both outcomes and access to LT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39324980
doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000495
pii: 01445473-990000000-00473
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Auteurs

Flavio Paterno (F)

Division of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

Grace S Lee-Riddle (GS)

Division of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

Raquel Olivo (R)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

Arpit N Amin (AN)

Division of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

Baburao Koneru (B)

Division of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

Nikolaos T Pyrsopoulos (NT)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

Keri E Lunsford (KE)

Division of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

James V Guarrera (JV)

Division of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ.

Classifications MeSH