Personalized Rehabilitation of Atrophic Customized Subperiosteal Implants.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Sep 2024
26 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
16
07
2024
accepted:
25
08
2024
medline:
26
9
2024
pubmed:
26
9
2024
entrez:
26
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Severe maxillary atrophy and edentulism can pose a range of challenges in implant planning and oral rehabilitation. Modern dentistry has allowed for a review of the concepts and surgical protocols of subperiosteal implants, presenting them as a solution for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillary and mandibular bone deficiencies. This study aims to address a series of 3 patients with severe maxillary atrophy, as evidenced by presurgical and postsurgical radiographic images, as well as computer-assisted planning and analysis of patient anatomy for rehabilitation with custom sintered subperiosteal implants. Promising results these clinical cases, highlighting the precise technique, biocompatibility, and durability of these materials. The absence of postoperative complications was evident, with high success rates in procedures and patient reports. Importantly, periodic follow-up is needed to assess the longevity and effectiveness of the technique used.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39325079
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010681
pii: 00001665-990000000-01972
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Spencer KR. Implant based rehabilitation options for the atrophic edentulous jaw. Aust Dent J 2018;suppl 1:S100–S107
Mommaerts MY. Evolutionary steps in the design and biofunctionalization of the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant “AMSJI” for the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;48:108–114
Nemtoi A, Covrig V, Nemtoi A, et al. Custom-made direct metal laser sintering titanium subperiosteal implants in oral and maxillofacial surgery for severe bone-deficient patients—a pilot study. Diagnostics 2022;12:2531–2543
Roy M, Corti A, Dominici S, et al. Biocompatibility of subperiosteal dental implants: effects of differently treated titanium surfaces on the expression of ECM-related genes in gingival fibroblasts. J Funct Biomater 2023;14:59–73
Van den Borre C, Neff B, Loomans NAJ, et al. Patient satisfaction and impact on oral health after maxillary rehabilitation using a personalized additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw Implant (AMSJI). J Pers Med 2023;13:297–306
Ângelo DF, Ferreira JRV. The role of custom-made subperiosteal implants for rehabilitation of atrophic jaws—a case report. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2020;10:507–511
Surovas A. A digital workflow for modeling of custom dental implants. 3D Print Med 2019;5:9–20
Van den Borre C, Rinaldi M, De Neef B, et al. Radiographic evaluation of bone remodeling after additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implantation (AMSJI) in the maxilla: a one-year follow-up. Study J Clin Med 2021;10:3542–3553
Parthasarathy J. 3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2014;4:9–18
James DC, Muthusekhar MR. Technology assisted reconstructive surgery—a case report. Dent Implants Dentures 2017;2:1–3
Agha RA, Sohrabi C, Mathew G, et al. The PROCESS 2020 Guideline: updating Consensus Preferred Reporting of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) Guidelines. Int J Surg 2020;84:231–235