Reserpine, a novel N6-methyladenosine regulator, reverses Lenvatinib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma Lenvatinib resistance METTL3 Reserpine m6A

Journal

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology
ISSN: 1618-095X
Titre abrégé: Phytomedicine
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9438794

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 01 03 2024
revised: 23 05 2024
accepted: 09 06 2024
medline: 27 9 2024
pubmed: 27 9 2024
entrez: 26 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy and a growing global health problem. Reserpine (Res), a plant-derived hypertension drug, has been reported to possess anti-tumor efficacy. However, the role and function of Res in N6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulation and Lenvatinib (Len) resistance in HCC have not been clarified. To verify whether Res can be used as a natural small-molecule regulator of m6A to reverse Len resistance in HCC. Dot blotting, Western blotting and m6A quantification were used to compare and analyze the differential expression of m6A and its methyltransferase METTL3. Western blotting, Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR), cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) and molecular docking were used to explore the mechanism of interaction between Res and m6A. The effects of Res on the biological characteristics of Lenvatinib-resistant HCC cells were investigated through CCK-8, clone formation, and Transwell assays. Cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models were used to assess the ability of Res to reverse Len resistance in vivo. MeRIP m6A sequencing, PATHWAY analysis and Western blotting were used to analyze the downstream signaling pathways and genes involved in Res-mediated reversal of Len resistance. Len resistance in HCC is related to the increased m6A level and the high expression of METTL3. Res affects the activity of METTL3 protein by binding to it, thereby downregulating the level of m6A. In vitro study showed that Res can sensitize HCC cells to the anti-tumor effects of Len treatment, including blocking proliferation, inhibiting migration, and inducing apoptosis. Len-resistant CDX and PDX models revealed that Res can reverse the resistant phenotype, with the tumor inhibition rates of 77.46 % and 62.1 %, respectively, when combined with Len treatment. Analysis of xenograft tissues showed that the combination of Res and Len down-regulates the m6A level, reduces proliferation biomarkers, and induces apoptosis, which is consistent with the in vitro data. Mechanistically, our preliminary results indicate that Res can up-regulate the SMAD3 level by down-regulating m6A in Len-resistant cells. Reserpine, a small-molecule regulator of m6A, reverses Lenvatinib-resistant phenotypes, including proliferation, migration and anti-apoptosis, in vitro and in vivo by targeting SMAD3 and down-regulating the m6A level in HCC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy and a growing global health problem. Reserpine (Res), a plant-derived hypertension drug, has been reported to possess anti-tumor efficacy. However, the role and function of Res in N6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulation and Lenvatinib (Len) resistance in HCC have not been clarified.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To verify whether Res can be used as a natural small-molecule regulator of m6A to reverse Len resistance in HCC.
METHODS METHODS
Dot blotting, Western blotting and m6A quantification were used to compare and analyze the differential expression of m6A and its methyltransferase METTL3. Western blotting, Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR), cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) and molecular docking were used to explore the mechanism of interaction between Res and m6A. The effects of Res on the biological characteristics of Lenvatinib-resistant HCC cells were investigated through CCK-8, clone formation, and Transwell assays. Cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models were used to assess the ability of Res to reverse Len resistance in vivo. MeRIP m6A sequencing, PATHWAY analysis and Western blotting were used to analyze the downstream signaling pathways and genes involved in Res-mediated reversal of Len resistance.
RESULTS RESULTS
Len resistance in HCC is related to the increased m6A level and the high expression of METTL3. Res affects the activity of METTL3 protein by binding to it, thereby downregulating the level of m6A. In vitro study showed that Res can sensitize HCC cells to the anti-tumor effects of Len treatment, including blocking proliferation, inhibiting migration, and inducing apoptosis. Len-resistant CDX and PDX models revealed that Res can reverse the resistant phenotype, with the tumor inhibition rates of 77.46 % and 62.1 %, respectively, when combined with Len treatment. Analysis of xenograft tissues showed that the combination of Res and Len down-regulates the m6A level, reduces proliferation biomarkers, and induces apoptosis, which is consistent with the in vitro data. Mechanistically, our preliminary results indicate that Res can up-regulate the SMAD3 level by down-regulating m6A in Len-resistant cells.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Reserpine, a small-molecule regulator of m6A, reverses Lenvatinib-resistant phenotypes, including proliferation, migration and anti-apoptosis, in vitro and in vivo by targeting SMAD3 and down-regulating the m6A level in HCC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39326134
pii: S0944-7113(24)00660-3
doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.156002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

156002

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest All authors disclose no relevant relationships.

Auteurs

Lei Zhao (L)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China.

Heyao Ma (H)

Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110122, China.

Yuhui Jiang (Y)

Department of Pharmacology, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, China.

Yingying Li (Y)

Department of Pharmacology, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, China.

Ning Guo (N)

Department of Pharmacology, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, China.

Yu Chen (Y)

Department of Pharmacology, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, China.

Xiaowen Jiang (X)

Department of Analysis and Pharmacology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, China.

Yunpeng Zhao (Y)

Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China.

Jingjing Yang (J)

Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China.

Yifei Liu (Y)

Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China.

Kaishu Wen (K)

Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China.

Lihui Wang (L)

Department of Pharmacology, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, China. Electronic address: lhwang@syphu.edu.cn.

Lingyan Jian (L)

Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China. Electronic address: jianly@sj-hospital.org.

Xinyu Fan (X)

Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China. Electronic address: fanxy@sj-hospital.org.

Classifications MeSH