Is full-automation in radiotherapy treatment planning ready for take off?
Automation
Human oversight
Treatment planning
Journal
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Sep 2024
24 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
29
04
2024
revised:
03
09
2024
accepted:
23
09
2024
medline:
27
9
2024
pubmed:
27
9
2024
entrez:
26
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Radiotherapy treatment planning is undergoing a transformation with the increasing integration of automation. This transition draws parallels with the aviation industry, which has a long-standing history of addressing challenges and opportunities introduced by automated systems. Both fields witness a shift from manual operations to systems capable of operating independently, raising questions about the risks and evolving role of humans within automated workflows. In response to this shift, a working group assembled during the ESTRO Physics Workshop 2023, reflected on parallels to draw lessons for radiotherapy. A taxonomy is proposed, leveraging insights from aviation, that outlines the observed levels of automation within the context of radiotherapy and their corresponding implications for human involvement. Among the common identified risks associated with automation integration are complacency, overreliance, attention tunneling, data overload, a lack of transparency and training. These risks require mitigation strategies. Such strategies include ensuring role complementarity, introducing checklists and safety requirements for human-automation interaction and using automation for cognitive unload and workflow management. Focusing on already automated processes, such as dose calculation and auto-contouring as examples, we have translated lessons learned from aviation. It remains crucial to strike a balance between automation and human involvement. While automation offers the potential for increased efficiency and accuracy, it must be complemented by human oversight, expertise, and critical decision-making. The irreplaceable value of human judgment remains, particularly in complex clinical situations. Learning from aviation, we identify a need for human factors engineering research in radiation oncology and a continued requirement for proactive incident learning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39326522
pii: S0167-8140(24)03524-2
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110546
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110546Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.