The German research consortium for the study of bipolar disorder (BipoLife): a quality assurance protocol for MR neuroimaging data.
BipoLife
Bipolar disorder
Early intervention
Early recognition
MRI
Multicenter study
Quality assurance
Journal
International journal of bipolar disorders
ISSN: 2194-7511
Titre abrégé: Int J Bipolar Disord
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101622983
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Sep 2024
26 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
11
12
2023
accepted:
06
09
2024
medline:
27
9
2024
pubmed:
27
9
2024
entrez:
26
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The German multicenter research consortium BipoLife aims to investigate the mechanisms underlying bipolar disorders. It focuses in particular on people at high risk of developing the disorder and young patients in the early stages of the disease. Functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was collected in all participating centers. The collection of neuroimaging data in a longitudinal, multicenter study requires the implementation of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) protocol. Here, we outline this protocol and illustrate its application within the BipoLife consortium. The QA protocol consisted of (1) a training of participating research staff, (2) regular phantom measurements to evaluate the MR scanner performance and its temporal stability across the course of the study, and (3) the assessment of the quality of human MRI data by evaluating a variety of image metrics (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, ghosting level). In this article, we will provide an overview on these QA procedures and show exemplarily the influence of its application on the results of standard neuroimaging analysis pipelines. The QA protocol helped to characterize the various MR scanners, to record their performance over the course of the study and to detect possible malfunctions at an early stage. It also assessed the quality of the human MRI data systematically to characterize its influence on various analyses. Furthermore, by setting up and publishing this protocol, we define standards that must be considered when analyzing data from the BipoLife consortium. It further promotes a systematic evaluation of data quality and a definition of subject inclusion criteria. In the long term, it will help to increase the chance of achieving clinically relevant results.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The German multicenter research consortium BipoLife aims to investigate the mechanisms underlying bipolar disorders. It focuses in particular on people at high risk of developing the disorder and young patients in the early stages of the disease. Functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was collected in all participating centers. The collection of neuroimaging data in a longitudinal, multicenter study requires the implementation of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) protocol. Here, we outline this protocol and illustrate its application within the BipoLife consortium.
METHODS
METHODS
The QA protocol consisted of (1) a training of participating research staff, (2) regular phantom measurements to evaluate the MR scanner performance and its temporal stability across the course of the study, and (3) the assessment of the quality of human MRI data by evaluating a variety of image metrics (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, ghosting level). In this article, we will provide an overview on these QA procedures and show exemplarily the influence of its application on the results of standard neuroimaging analysis pipelines.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The QA protocol helped to characterize the various MR scanners, to record their performance over the course of the study and to detect possible malfunctions at an early stage. It also assessed the quality of the human MRI data systematically to characterize its influence on various analyses. Furthermore, by setting up and publishing this protocol, we define standards that must be considered when analyzing data from the BipoLife consortium. It further promotes a systematic evaluation of data quality and a definition of subject inclusion criteria. In the long term, it will help to increase the chance of achieving clinically relevant results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39327338
doi: 10.1186/s40345-024-00354-7
pii: 10.1186/s40345-024-00354-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
33Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Bauer MS. Bipolar Disorder. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(7):ITC97-112.
doi: 10.7326/AITC202207190
pubmed: 35816713
Esteban O, Birman D, Schaer M, Koyejo OO, Poldrack RA, Gorgolewski KJ. MRIQC: advancing the automatic prediction of image quality in MRI from unseen sites. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0184661.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661
pubmed: 28945803
pmcid: 5612458
Friedman L, Glover GH. Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23(6):827–39.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.20583
pubmed: 16649196
GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):137–50.
Glover GH, Mueller BA, Turner JA, Van Erp TGMM, Liu TT, Greve DN, et al. Function biomedical informatics research network recommendations for prospective multicenter functional MRI studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36(1):39–54.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.23572
pubmed: 22314879
pmcid: 3349791
Goto M, Abe O, Miyati T, Yamasue H, Gomi T, Takeda T. Head motion and correction methods in resting-state functional MRI. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2016;15(2):178–86.
doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2015-0060
pubmed: 26701695
Haddad SMH, Scott CJM, Ozzoude M, Holmes MF, Arnott SR, Nanayakkara ND, et al. Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12): e0226715.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226715
pubmed: 31860686
pmcid: 6924651
Halchenko Y, Goncalves M, Castello MV di O, Ghosh S, Hanke M, Dae, et al. nipy/heudiconv v0.6.0. Zenodo; 2019. https://zenodo.org/records/3579455. Accessed 17 May 2024
Hellerbach. Hellerbach_Dis. 2013. http://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2014/0048
Huth F, Tozzi L, Marxen M, Riedel P, Bröckel K, Martini J, et al. Machine learning prediction of estimated risk for bipolar disorders using hippocampal subfield and amygdala nuclei volumes. Brain Sci. 2023;13(6):870.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060870
pubmed: 37371350
pmcid: 10296102
Lu W, Dong K, Cui D, Jiao Q, Qiu J. Quality assurance of human functional magnetic resonance imaging: a literature review. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9(6):1147–62.
doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.04.18
pubmed: 31367569
pmcid: 6629553
McIntyre RS, Berk M, Brietzke E, Goldstein BI, López-Jaramillo C, Kessing LV, et al. Bipolar disorders. The Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1841–56.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31544-0
McLaughlin PM, Sunderland KM, Beaton D, Binns MA, Kwan D, Levine B, et al. The quality assurance and quality control protocol for neuropsychological data collection and curation in the Ontario neurodegenerative disease research initiative (ONDRI) study. Assessment. 2021;28(5):1267–86.
doi: 10.1177/1073191120913933
pubmed: 32321297
Mikolas P, Bröckel K, Vogelbacher C, Müller DK, Marxen M, Berndt C, et al. Individuals at increased risk for development of bipolar disorder display structural alterations similar to people with manifest disease. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):485.
doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01598-y
pubmed: 34545071
pmcid: 8452775
Mikolas P, Marxen M, Riedel P, Bröckel K, Martini J, Huth F, et al. Prediction of estimated risk for bipolar disorder using machine learning and structural MRI features. Psychol Med. 2023;22:1–11.
Pfennig A, Leopold K, Martini J, Boehme A, Lambert M, Stamm T, et al. Improving early recognition and intervention in people at increased risk for the development of bipolar disorder: study protocol of a prospective-longitudinal, naturalistic cohort study (Early-BipoLife). Int J Bipolar Disorders. 2020;8(1):22.
doi: 10.1186/s40345-020-00183-4
Power JD, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2015;15(105):536–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.044
Ritter PS, Bermpohl F, Gruber O, Hautzinger M, Jansen A, Juckel G, et al. Aims and structure of the German Research Consortium BipoLife for the study of bipolar disorder. Int J Bipolar Disorders. 2016;4(1):26.
doi: 10.1186/s40345-016-0066-0
Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol. 2000;12(4):191–200.
doi: 10.1155/2000/421719
pubmed: 11568431
Saraf G, Moazen-Zadeh E, Pinto JV, Ziafat K, Torres IJ, Kesavan M, et al. Early intervention for people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder: a systematic review of clinical trials. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(1):64–75.
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30188-7
pubmed: 32857954
Sreedher G, Ho M-L, Smith M, Udayasankar UK, Risacher S, Rapalino O, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging quality control, quality assurance and quality improvement. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51(5):698–708.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05043-6
pubmed: 33772641
Stöcker T, Schneider F, Klein M, Habel U, Kellermann T, Zilles K, et al. Automated quality assurance routines for fMRI data applied to a multicenter study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25:237–46.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20096
pubmed: 15846770
pmcid: 6871722
Sunderland KM, Beaton D, Fraser J, Kwan D, McLaughlin PM, Montero-Odasso M, et al. The utility of multivariate outlier detection techniques for data quality evaluation in large studies: an application within the ONDRI project. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):102.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0737-5
pubmed: 31092212
pmcid: 6521365
Van Horn JD, Toga AW. Multisite neuroimaging trials. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009;22(4):370–8.
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32832d92de
pubmed: 19506479
pmcid: 2777976
Vogelbacher C, Möbius TWD, Sommer J, Schuster V, Dannlowski U, Kircher T, et al. The Marburg-Münster affective disorders Cohort study (MACS): a quality assurance protocol for MR neuroimaging data. Neuroimage. 2018;172:450–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.079
pubmed: 29410079
Vogelbacher C, Bopp MHA, Schuster V, Herholz P, Jansen A, Sommer J. LAB–QA2GO: a free, easy-to-use toolbox for the quality assessment of magnetic resonance imaging data. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:688.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00688
pubmed: 31333406
pmcid: 6617644
Vogelbacher C, Sommer J, Schuster V, Bopp MHA, Falkenberg I, Ritter PS, et al. The German research consortium for the study of bipolar disorder (BipoLife): a magnetic resonance imaging study protocol. Int J Bipolar Disorders. 2021;9(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s40345-021-00240-6
Vogelbacher C. Development of quality standards for multi-center, longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies in clinical neuroscience. University of Marburg. 2020. https://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2020/0151
Zaitsev M, Akin B, LeVan P, Knowles BR. Prospective motion correction in functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2017;1(154):33–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.014