The impact of transport, housing, and urban development interventions on older adults' mobility: A systematic review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies.


Journal

Journal of transport & health
ISSN: 2214-1405
Titre abrégé: J Transp Health
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101633121

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 26 02 2024
revised: 21 05 2024
accepted: 10 06 2024
medline: 27 9 2024
pubmed: 27 9 2024
entrez: 27 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Age-friendly cities and communities aim to enhance and preserve the functional abilities of older adults. This systematic review assesses the impact of interventions in transportation, housing, and urban development on the mobility of older adults. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX up to July 2022 to identify studies that evaluated the impact of transportation, housing, and urban development interventions on older adults' mobility. Only randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies with control groups were included to establish a causal relationship between interventions and mobility outcomes. We included a total of 15 studies, of which six were randomised controlled trials. Included studies were conducted in high-income settings and employed diverse metrics to assess mobility outcomes. Among housing interventions, three studies examined the impact of assistive technology within home environments for frail older adults. Two of these interventions maintained functional status without improvement, while the third showed a significant decline in outcomes, with the control group faring even worse. Public transport interventions, focused on enhancing mobility through educational initiatives and policy revisions, consistently produced positive outcomes. Interventions related to driving training for older adults, including in-class and on-road assessments, demonstrated beneficial effects. Results from studies evaluating urban design interventions were more varied, with some enhancing mobility by making public spaces more accessible for older adults and others yielding mixed results following infrastructure changes. Interventions in the built environments of older adults, specifically targeting transportation, housing and urban development, have the potential to enhance mobility and related outcomes according to rigorously designed quantitative evaluations. Due to heterogeneity in how mobility is conceptualised in the literature, greater harmonisation in measurement of mobility would help us understand how the social and built environment contribute to maintaining and improving mobility in older adults. World Health Organization.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Age-friendly cities and communities aim to enhance and preserve the functional abilities of older adults. This systematic review assesses the impact of interventions in transportation, housing, and urban development on the mobility of older adults.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX up to July 2022 to identify studies that evaluated the impact of transportation, housing, and urban development interventions on older adults' mobility. Only randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies with control groups were included to establish a causal relationship between interventions and mobility outcomes.
Findings UNASSIGNED
We included a total of 15 studies, of which six were randomised controlled trials. Included studies were conducted in high-income settings and employed diverse metrics to assess mobility outcomes. Among housing interventions, three studies examined the impact of assistive technology within home environments for frail older adults. Two of these interventions maintained functional status without improvement, while the third showed a significant decline in outcomes, with the control group faring even worse. Public transport interventions, focused on enhancing mobility through educational initiatives and policy revisions, consistently produced positive outcomes. Interventions related to driving training for older adults, including in-class and on-road assessments, demonstrated beneficial effects. Results from studies evaluating urban design interventions were more varied, with some enhancing mobility by making public spaces more accessible for older adults and others yielding mixed results following infrastructure changes.
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
Interventions in the built environments of older adults, specifically targeting transportation, housing and urban development, have the potential to enhance mobility and related outcomes according to rigorously designed quantitative evaluations. Due to heterogeneity in how mobility is conceptualised in the literature, greater harmonisation in measurement of mobility would help us understand how the social and built environment contribute to maintaining and improving mobility in older adults.
Funding UNASSIGNED
World Health Organization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39328280
doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2024.101859
pii: S2214-1405(24)00105-1
pmc: PMC11422292
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

101859

Informations de copyright

© 2024 World Health Organization.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Thiago Hérick de Sá (T)

Demographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Department for Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Switzerland.

Daniele Sudsataya (D)

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Andra Fry (A)

LSE Library, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Nazak Salehi (N)

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Aishwarya Katiki (A)

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Megan Mcleod (M)

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Greg Rathmell (G)

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Jon Cylus (J)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, UK.

Louise Lafortune (L)

Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, UK.

Tine Buffel (T)

Manchester Urban Ageing Research Group, University of Manchester, UK.

Patty Doran (P)

Manchester Urban Ageing Research Group, University of Manchester, UK.

Alana Officer (A)

Demographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Department for Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Switzerland.

Huseyin Naci (H)

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Classifications MeSH