Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in pig after cardiac arrest - A new histopathological scoring system for non-specialists.

After cardiac arrest and successful resuscitation patients often present with hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, which is a major cause of death due to poor neurological outcome. The development of a robust histopathological scoring system for the reliable and easy identification and quantification of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury could lead to a standardization in the evaluation of brain damage. We wanted to establish an easy-to-use neuropathological scoring system to identify and quantify hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. The criteria for regular neurons, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury neurons and neurons with ischemic neuronal change (ischemic change neurons) were established in collaboration with specialized neuropathologists. Nine non-specialist examiners performed cell counting using the mentioned criteria in brain tissue samples from a porcine cardiac arrest model. The statistical analyses were performed using the interclass correlation coefficient for counting data and reliability testing. The inter-rater reliability for regular neurons (ICC 0.68 (0.42 - 0.84; p < 0.001) and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury neurons (ICC 0.87 (0.81 - 0.92; p < 0.001) showed moderate to excellent correlation while ischemic change neurons showed poor reliability. Excellent results were seen for intra-rater reliability for regular neurons (ICC 0.9 (0.68 - 0.97; p < 0.001) and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury neurons (ICC 0.99 (0.83 - 1; p < 0.001). The scoring system provides a reliable method for the discrimination between regular neurons and neurons affected by hypoxic/ischemic injury. This scoring system allows an easy and reliable identification and quantification of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury for non-specialists and offers a standardization to evaluate hypoxic-ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest.

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.