International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study.

Cross-boundary working Delphi Integrated care

Journal

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
ISSN: 1464-3677
Titre abrégé: Int J Qual Health Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9434628

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 15 04 2024
revised: 04 09 2024
accepted: 26 09 2024
medline: 27 9 2024
pubmed: 27 9 2024
entrez: 27 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Integrated care can be broadly defined as the delivery of high-quality and safe care for patients as they cross organisational boundaries or when care is delivered with multiple healthcare teams, professions or organisations. Successful integration of care services is contingent on multiple and complex factors across macro-, meso- and micro-levels of health and social care systems in lower-, middle- and higher-income countries. Previous priorities for the future development of integrated care have focused on designing and implementing models or approaches to integrated care rather than establishing the research needed to underpin them. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by developing a consensus on international research priorities related to integration of care and cross-boundary working. We conducted a sequential electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study from September 2023 to December 2023. The eDelphi process consisted of initial priority generation followed by two rounds of consensus development via an online survey. Sixty-six priorities were generated by 19 delegates at an international conference workshop titled, "Priority setting for future research on integration of care and cross-boundary working." Workshop delegates then identified other experts in integrated care and cross-boundary working from their networks. In each eDelphi round, participants then provided item-by-item responses using a seven-point Likert scale, with consensus defined a priori as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree). Priorities that reached consensus were conceptually grouped into topics. Twenty-five of 66 unique (37.9%) research priorities achieved consensus after two eDelphi rounds. In Round 1, 63/85 (74.1%) experts from ten countries across four continents achieved consensus on 12/66 (18.2%) priorities. In Round 2, 51/63 (81.0%) experts achieved consensus on a further 13/54 (24.1%) priorities. From the 25 priorities, we derived six conceptual groupings that represent broad topics for future research on integrated care and cross-boundary working: (1) access to care, (2) data sharing and technology, (3) measurement of care quality, (4) patient experience and satisfaction, (5) service design, integration and governance, and (6) teamwork and leadership. Integrating care services and improving cross-boundary working is important for improving the quality of care provided to patients regardless of country, therefore the conceptual topics and individual priorities identified in this study can inform policy makers, practitioners, and researchers when designing or evaluating integrated care services across the world in the pursuit of improved integrated care systems.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Integrated care can be broadly defined as the delivery of high-quality and safe care for patients as they cross organisational boundaries or when care is delivered with multiple healthcare teams, professions or organisations. Successful integration of care services is contingent on multiple and complex factors across macro-, meso- and micro-levels of health and social care systems in lower-, middle- and higher-income countries. Previous priorities for the future development of integrated care have focused on designing and implementing models or approaches to integrated care rather than establishing the research needed to underpin them. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by developing a consensus on international research priorities related to integration of care and cross-boundary working.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a sequential electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study from September 2023 to December 2023. The eDelphi process consisted of initial priority generation followed by two rounds of consensus development via an online survey. Sixty-six priorities were generated by 19 delegates at an international conference workshop titled, "Priority setting for future research on integration of care and cross-boundary working." Workshop delegates then identified other experts in integrated care and cross-boundary working from their networks. In each eDelphi round, participants then provided item-by-item responses using a seven-point Likert scale, with consensus defined a priori as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree). Priorities that reached consensus were conceptually grouped into topics.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-five of 66 unique (37.9%) research priorities achieved consensus after two eDelphi rounds. In Round 1, 63/85 (74.1%) experts from ten countries across four continents achieved consensus on 12/66 (18.2%) priorities. In Round 2, 51/63 (81.0%) experts achieved consensus on a further 13/54 (24.1%) priorities. From the 25 priorities, we derived six conceptual groupings that represent broad topics for future research on integrated care and cross-boundary working: (1) access to care, (2) data sharing and technology, (3) measurement of care quality, (4) patient experience and satisfaction, (5) service design, integration and governance, and (6) teamwork and leadership.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Integrating care services and improving cross-boundary working is important for improving the quality of care provided to patients regardless of country, therefore the conceptual topics and individual priorities identified in this study can inform policy makers, practitioners, and researchers when designing or evaluating integrated care services across the world in the pursuit of improved integrated care systems.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39330981
pii: 7780341
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae095
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care.

Auteurs

Jason Scott (J)

Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Justin Waring (J)

Birmingham University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Aaron Asibi Abuosi (AA)

Department of Health Services Management, University of Ghana Business School, Ghana.

Yakubu Adole Agada-Amade (YA)

Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
National Health Insurance Authority, Abuja, Nigeria.

Jibril Muhammad Bashar (JM)

National Health Insurance Authority, Abuja, Nigeria.

Aoife De Brún (A)

UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Henry Cann (H)

The Health Foundation - Q, London, United Kingdom.

Philip Crowley (P)

The Health Service Executive (HSE) Strategy and Research, HSE, Dublin, Ireland.

Lindsay H Dewa (LH)

School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Samantha Spanos (S)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Siri Wiig (S)

Centre for Resilience in Healthcare (SHARE), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Classifications MeSH