Understanding the costs and economic impact of mental disorders in South Asia: A systematic review.

Health economics Mental health Mental health policy South Asia Systematic review

Journal

Asian journal of psychiatry
ISSN: 1876-2026
Titre abrégé: Asian J Psychiatr
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101517820

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 22 02 2024
revised: 11 07 2024
accepted: 05 09 2024
medline: 27 9 2024
pubmed: 27 9 2024
entrez: 27 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Mental disorders remain the most significant contributor to years lived with disability in South Asia, yet governmental health expenditure on mental health in South Asia remains very low with limited strategic policy development. To strengthen the case for action it is important to better understand the profound economic costs associated with poor mental health. We conducted a systematic review on the costs of all mental disorders, as well as intentional self-harm and suicide, in the World Bank South Asia Region. Ten global and South Asian databases as well as grey literature sources were searched. 72 studies were identified, including 38 meeting high quality criteria for good reporting of costs. Of these, 27 covered India, five Pakistan, four Nepal and three Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Most studies focused on depressive disorders (15), psychoses (14) and harmful alcohol use (7); knowledge of economic impacts for other conditions was limited. Profound economic impacts within and beyond health care systems were found. In 15 of 18 studies which included productivity losses to individuals and/or carers, these costs more than outweighed costs of health care. Mental disorders represent a considerable economic burden, but existing estimates are conservative as they do not consider long-term impacts or the full range of conditions. Modelling studies could be employed covering longer time periods and more conditions. Clear distinctions should be reported between out-of-pocket and health system costs, as well as between mental health service-specific and physical health-related costs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mental disorders remain the most significant contributor to years lived with disability in South Asia, yet governmental health expenditure on mental health in South Asia remains very low with limited strategic policy development. To strengthen the case for action it is important to better understand the profound economic costs associated with poor mental health.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a systematic review on the costs of all mental disorders, as well as intentional self-harm and suicide, in the World Bank South Asia Region. Ten global and South Asian databases as well as grey literature sources were searched.
RESULTS RESULTS
72 studies were identified, including 38 meeting high quality criteria for good reporting of costs. Of these, 27 covered India, five Pakistan, four Nepal and three Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Most studies focused on depressive disorders (15), psychoses (14) and harmful alcohol use (7); knowledge of economic impacts for other conditions was limited. Profound economic impacts within and beyond health care systems were found. In 15 of 18 studies which included productivity losses to individuals and/or carers, these costs more than outweighed costs of health care.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Mental disorders represent a considerable economic burden, but existing estimates are conservative as they do not consider long-term impacts or the full range of conditions. Modelling studies could be employed covering longer time periods and more conditions. Clear distinctions should be reported between out-of-pocket and health system costs, as well as between mental health service-specific and physical health-related costs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39332059
pii: S1876-2018(24)00332-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104239
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104239

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

David McDaid (D)

Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Electronic address: d.mcdaid@lse.ac.uk.

Aishwarya Lakshmi Vidyasagaran (AL)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Muhammed Nasir (M)

Department of Economics, Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi, Pakistan.

Simon Walker (S)

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

Judy Wright (J)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Krishna Prasad Muliyala (KP)

Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.

Sreekanth Thekkumkara (S)

School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Rumana Huque (R)

ARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Mehreen Riaz Faisal (MR)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Saumit Benkalkar (S)

King's College London, Strand, London, UK.

Mohammod Akbar Kabir (MA)

Department of Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Claire Russell (C)

Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia.

Najma Siddiqi (N)

Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School (HYMS), York, UK; Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust (BDCFT), Bradford, UK.

Classifications MeSH