Change in lower limb length following total knee arthroplasty.

Alignment Knee arthroplasty Leg length discrepancy Limb lengthening Navigation

Journal

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 27 04 2024
revised: 20 09 2024
accepted: 24 09 2024
medline: 28 9 2024
pubmed: 28 9 2024
entrez: 27 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Length variations of the lower limbs after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) constitute a poorly evaluated parameter and can be associated with worse functional outcomes. The objectives of this study were to: 1) describe the variations in the lower limb length after TKA according to the digital accuracy of the computerized navigation system used for prosthesis implantation, 2) describe patient sensation of limb length modification at 3 months postoperatively and to identify its risk factors, 3) identify factors affecting lower limb length modification and to analyze the predictive value causing in the patient the sensation of lower limb discrepancy. We hypothesize that there may be a lower limb length discrepancy after TKA, which may cause some distress to the patient. This prospective study included 100 TKAs implanted with navigation gap-balanced adjusted mechanical alignment. Were compared the length of the lower limb before and after implantation and the patient's changes in leg length perception at 3 months postoperatively. A subgroup analysis was performed according to preoperative knee deformities: varus knee was an HKA < 177 °, normal knee was an HKA between 117°-183 ° and valgus was an HKA >183 °. Ninety-seven out of 100 patients experienced lengthening compared to the preoperative ipsilateral length, and twenty-three experienced lengthening greater than 10 mm. The mean lengthening was 7.3 mm (maximum 24.8 mm). Lengthening was significantly greater in valgus knees 9.9 mm [range, 2.0-24.8] than in varus 7.2 mm [range, 1.46-19.4] and normal knees 4.11 mm [range, 0.4-11.4] (p < 0.05). The correction of frontal and sagittal deformation were risk factors for limb length modification (OR = 0.595; 95% CI (0.544-0.816) (p = 0.001), OR = 0.396; 95% CI (0.351-0.653) (p = 0.001)). Twenty-two patients reported a sensation of limb length change: 11 (50%) reported equalization, whereas the remainder reported lengthening with a leg length difference. The preoperative sensation of lower limb length inequality was the unique factor affecting the patient's perception post-surgery (OR = 37.50; 95% CI (9.730-144.526) (p = 0.0001)). A threshold value of 6.6 mm was identified for the sensation of limb length modification. Navigation is a tool for describing ipsilateral leg length variations after TKA. These variations are significant and perhaps explain some patient dissatisfaction. A partial correction of the frontal deformity according to the knee phenotype could limit the risk of modification of the native length. IV; Descriptive therapeutic prospective study.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Length variations of the lower limbs after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) constitute a poorly evaluated parameter and can be associated with worse functional outcomes. The objectives of this study were to: 1) describe the variations in the lower limb length after TKA according to the digital accuracy of the computerized navigation system used for prosthesis implantation, 2) describe patient sensation of limb length modification at 3 months postoperatively and to identify its risk factors, 3) identify factors affecting lower limb length modification and to analyze the predictive value causing in the patient the sensation of lower limb discrepancy.
HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
We hypothesize that there may be a lower limb length discrepancy after TKA, which may cause some distress to the patient.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
This prospective study included 100 TKAs implanted with navigation gap-balanced adjusted mechanical alignment. Were compared the length of the lower limb before and after implantation and the patient's changes in leg length perception at 3 months postoperatively. A subgroup analysis was performed according to preoperative knee deformities: varus knee was an HKA < 177 °, normal knee was an HKA between 117°-183 ° and valgus was an HKA >183 °.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ninety-seven out of 100 patients experienced lengthening compared to the preoperative ipsilateral length, and twenty-three experienced lengthening greater than 10 mm. The mean lengthening was 7.3 mm (maximum 24.8 mm). Lengthening was significantly greater in valgus knees 9.9 mm [range, 2.0-24.8] than in varus 7.2 mm [range, 1.46-19.4] and normal knees 4.11 mm [range, 0.4-11.4] (p < 0.05). The correction of frontal and sagittal deformation were risk factors for limb length modification (OR = 0.595; 95% CI (0.544-0.816) (p = 0.001), OR = 0.396; 95% CI (0.351-0.653) (p = 0.001)). Twenty-two patients reported a sensation of limb length change: 11 (50%) reported equalization, whereas the remainder reported lengthening with a leg length difference. The preoperative sensation of lower limb length inequality was the unique factor affecting the patient's perception post-surgery (OR = 37.50; 95% CI (9.730-144.526) (p = 0.0001)). A threshold value of 6.6 mm was identified for the sensation of limb length modification.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Navigation is a tool for describing ipsilateral leg length variations after TKA. These variations are significant and perhaps explain some patient dissatisfaction. A partial correction of the frontal deformity according to the knee phenotype could limit the risk of modification of the native length.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
IV; Descriptive therapeutic prospective study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39332611
pii: S1877-0568(24)00291-3
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104005

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

Simon Marmor (S)

Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconnesses Croix St-Simon, 125 rue Avron 75020 Paris, France.

Younes Kerroumi (Y)

Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconnesses Croix St-Simon, 125 rue Avron 75020 Paris, France.

Guillaume Rigoulot (G)

Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconnesses Croix St-Simon, 125 rue Avron 75020 Paris, France.

Pierre-Alban Bouché (PA)

Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconnesses Croix St-Simon, 125 rue Avron 75020 Paris, France; Université médecine Paris-Cité, 16 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. Electronic address: pierrealban309@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH