Early stopping versus continued retrievals after failed recanalization: associated factors and implications for outcome.

Intervention Stroke Technique

Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 21 06 2024
accepted: 28 08 2024
medline: 28 9 2024
pubmed: 28 9 2024
entrez: 27 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Successful recanalization defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score (mTICI) ≥2b is not achieved in 15%-20% of patients with acute ischemic stroke. This study aims to identify patient-specific factors associated with early stopping without successful recanalization. We hypothesized that the probability of the decision for early stopping during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is higher in patients with an unfavorable prognosis. All patients enrolled in the German Stroke Registry (GSR) between June 2015 and December 2021 were screened. Inclusion criteria were stroke in the anterior circulation and availability of relevant clinical data. For each retrieval attempt 1-3, patients with stopping and failed reperfusion (mTICI <2b) were compared with all patients with continued retrieval attempts using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. Our study included 2977 patients, 350 (12%) of which had early stopping. Higher pre-stroke Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) =1.20 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09; 1.32), P<0.001), higher age (aOR=1.01 (1.00; 1.02), P=0.017) and distal occlusions (aOR=1.93 (1.50; 2.47), P<0.001) as well as intraprocedural dissections/perforations (aOR=4.61 (2.95; 7.20), P<0.001) and extravasation (aOR=2.43 (1.55;3.82), P<0.001) were associated with early stopping. In patients with unsuccessful recanalization (n=622), the number of retrieval attempts (aOR=1.05 (0.94; 1.18), p=0.405) was not associated with unfavorable outcomes (90d-mRS>3). The probability of early stopping was higher in patients with clinical conditions associated with: a) Favorable prognosis and assumed lower impact of recanalization success on functional status, such as distal occlusions; and b) Unfavorable prognosis, such as higher age and reduced pre-stroke functional status. Adverse events during the procedure increased the probability of early stopping. The number of recanalization attempts did not increase the risk of unfavorable outcome for patients with persistent occlusion, supporting the decision for continuation of retrieval attempts.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Successful recanalization defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score (mTICI) ≥2b is not achieved in 15%-20% of patients with acute ischemic stroke. This study aims to identify patient-specific factors associated with early stopping without successful recanalization. We hypothesized that the probability of the decision for early stopping during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is higher in patients with an unfavorable prognosis.
METHODS METHODS
All patients enrolled in the German Stroke Registry (GSR) between June 2015 and December 2021 were screened. Inclusion criteria were stroke in the anterior circulation and availability of relevant clinical data. For each retrieval attempt 1-3, patients with stopping and failed reperfusion (mTICI <2b) were compared with all patients with continued retrieval attempts using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our study included 2977 patients, 350 (12%) of which had early stopping. Higher pre-stroke Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) =1.20 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09; 1.32), P<0.001), higher age (aOR=1.01 (1.00; 1.02), P=0.017) and distal occlusions (aOR=1.93 (1.50; 2.47), P<0.001) as well as intraprocedural dissections/perforations (aOR=4.61 (2.95; 7.20), P<0.001) and extravasation (aOR=2.43 (1.55;3.82), P<0.001) were associated with early stopping. In patients with unsuccessful recanalization (n=622), the number of retrieval attempts (aOR=1.05 (0.94; 1.18), p=0.405) was not associated with unfavorable outcomes (90d-mRS>3).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The probability of early stopping was higher in patients with clinical conditions associated with: a) Favorable prognosis and assumed lower impact of recanalization success on functional status, such as distal occlusions; and b) Unfavorable prognosis, such as higher age and reduced pre-stroke functional status. Adverse events during the procedure increased the probability of early stopping. The number of recanalization attempts did not increase the risk of unfavorable outcome for patients with persistent occlusion, supporting the decision for continuation of retrieval attempts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39332899
pii: jnis-2024-022157
doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022157
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Investigateurs

Joachim Röther (J)
Bernd Eckert (B)
Michael Braun (M)
Gerhard F Hamann (GF)
Eberhard Siebert (E)
Christian Nolte (C)
Sarah Zweynert (S)
Georg Bohner (G)
Jörg Berrouschot (J)
Albrecht Bormann (A)
Christoffer Kraemer (C)
Hannes Leischner (H)
Jörg Hattingen (J)
Martina Petersen (M)
Florian Stögbauer (F)
Boeckh Behrens (B)
Silke Wunderlich (S)
Alexander Ludolph (A)
Karl-Heinz Henn (KH)
Christian Gerloff (C)
Jens Fiehler (J)
Götz Thomalla (G)
Anna Alegiani (A)
Maximilian Schell (M)
Arno Reich (A)
Omid Nikoubashman (O)
Franziska Dorn (F)
Gabor Petzold (G)
Jan Liman (J)
Hendrik Schäfer (H)
Fee Keil (F)
Klaus Gröschel (K)
Timo Uphaus (T)
Peter Schellinger (P)
Jan Borggrefe (J)
Steffen Tiedt (S)
Lars Kellert (L)
Christoph Trumm (C)
Ulrike Ernemann (U)
Sven Poli (S)
Christian Riedel (C)
Marielle Sophie Ernst (MS)

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: HK and FF are consultants for Eppdata GmbH. HK is shareholder of Eppdata GmbH. GT received consultancy fees from Acandis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Portola, and fees as lecturer from Acandis, Alexion, Amarin, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichii Sankyo and Portola. He serves in the board of the TEA Stroke Study and of ESO. JF is consultant for Cerenovus, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, Phenox, Roche and Tonbridge. He serves on the advisory board of Stryker and Phenox. He is a stock holder of Tegus Medical, Eppdata and Vastrax. He serves as Associate Editor at JNIS.

Auteurs

Helge C Kniep (HC)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany H.kniep@uke.de.

Lukas Meyer (L)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Gabriel Broocks (G)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Neuroradiology, HELIOS Medical Center, Campus of MSH Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany.

Matthias Bechstein (M)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Christian Heitkamp (C)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Laurens Winkelmeier (L)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Vincent Geest (V)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Tobias D Faizy (TD)

Neuroendovascular Program, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Ludger Feyen (L)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany.
Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.

Caspar Brekenfeld (C)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Fabian Flottmann (F)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Rosalie V McDonough (RV)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Mate Maros (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Biomedical Informatics at the Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD-BW), Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Maximilian Schell (M)

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Uta Hanning (U)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Goetz Thomalla (G)

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Jens Fiehler (J)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Susanne Gellissen (S)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH