Echogenic needles versus non-echogenic needles for in-plane ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary vein cannulation, a randomized controlled trial.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
25
01
2024
accepted:
09
09
2024
medline:
28
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
27
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Echogenic needles improve the reflection of the ultrasound beam. The aim of the study was to compare needle performance during ultrasound-guided cannulation of the infraclavicular axillary vein with an in-plane needle approach, using echogenic needles or non-echogenic standard needles. One hundred adult patients undergoing surgical procedures that required a central venous catheter were randomized for either echogenic or non-echogenic needles. The primary outcome was access time. Secondary outcomes encompassed total procedure time, success in first attempt, number of attempts, number of skin punctures, change of site for vascular access, catheter placement, subjective experience with needle visualization and needle procedure, and adverse events. Median (IQR) [range] venous access time was 21 (15-56) [6-440] in echogenic needle group and 26 (14-91) [6-925] in the non-echogenic needle group (p = 0.40). No statistically significant differences were found in the secondary outcome measures. One patient (non-echogenic needle group) experienced pneumothorax. In three patients in each group (6%) arterial puncture occurred. Echogenic needles did not significantly improve needle control or safety when used for infraclavicular axillary vein cannulation with an in-plane needle approach. The results indicate that standard needles are appropriate for ultrasound guided subclavian vascular access in a perioperative situation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39333575
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72620-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-72620-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22258Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Rezayat, T. et al. Ultrasound-guided cannulation: Time to bring subclavian central lines back. West. J. Emerg. Med.17(2), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.1.29462 (2016).
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.1.29462
Brass, P., Hellmich, M., Kolodziej, L., Schick, G. & Smith, A. F. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1(1), 006962. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006962.pub2 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006962.pub2
Brusasco, C. et al. Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in bariatric patients. Obes. Surg.19(10), 1365–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9902-y (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9902-y
Scholten, H. J., Pourtaherian, A., Mihajlovic, N., Korsten, H. H. M. & Bouwman, R. A. Improving needle tip identification during ultrasound-guided procedures in anaesthetic practice. Anaesthesia72(7), 889–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13921 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/anae.13921
Wiesmann, T. et al. Compound imaging technology and echogenic needle design: Effects on needle visibility and tissue imaging. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med.38(5), 452–455. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e31829730d5 (2013).
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31829730d5
Stefanidis, K. et al. Optimization of cannula visibility during ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization, via a longitudinal approach, by implementing echogenic technology. Crit. Care Res. Pract.2012, 617149. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/617149 (2012).
doi: 10.1155/2012/617149
Stefanidis, K. et al. Echogenic technology improves cannula visibility during ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization via a transverse approach. Crit. Care Res. Pract.2012, 306182. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/306182 (2012).
doi: 10.1155/2012/306182
Johnson, D. Pelvic girdle, shoulder region and axilla. In Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basics of Clinical Practice 40th edn (ed. Standring, S.) 818 (Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 2008).
Nichols, K., Wright, L. B., Spencer, T. & Culp, W. C. Changes in ultrasonographic echogenicity and visibility of needles with changes in angles of insonation. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.14(12), 1553–1557. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rvi.0000099527.29957.a6 (2003).
doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000099527.29957.a6
Pépin, J. L. et al. Prevention and care of respiratory failure in obese patients. Lancet Respir. Med.4(5), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(16)00054-0 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/s2213-2600(16)00054-0
Crum, T., Adhikari, S., Lander, L. & Blaivas, M. Do echo-enhanced needles make a difference in sonographically guided vascular access?. J. Ultrasound Med.33(4), 623–628. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.4.623 (2014).
doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.4.623
Ortiz, S. H. C., Chiu, T. & Fox, M. D. Ultrasound image enhancement: A review. Biomed. Signal Process. Control7(5), 419–428 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2012.02.002
Sen, S. et al. Recent technological advancements in regional anesthesia. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol.33(4), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.002 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.002
Brookes, J. et al. Comparative evaluation of the visibility and block characteristics of a stimulating needle and catheter vs an echogenic needle and catheter for sciatic nerve block with a low-frequency ultrasound probe. Br. J. Anaesth.115(6), 912–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev351 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/bja/aev351
Hovgesen, C. H., Wilhjelm, J. E., Vilmann, P. & Kalaitzakis, E. Echogenic surface enhancements for improving needle visualization in ultrasound: A PRISMA systematic review. J. Ultrasound Med.41(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15713 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/jum.15713
Umbarje, K., Tang, R., Randhawa, R., Sawka, A. & Vaghadia, H. Out-of-plane brachial plexus block with a novel SonixGPS(TM) needle tracking system. Anaesthesia68(4), 433–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12213 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/anae.12213
Gadsden, J., Latmore, M. & Levine, D. M. Evaluation of the eZono 4000 with eZGuide for ultrasound-guided procedures. Expert Rev. Med. Devices12(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2015.995095 (2015).
doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.995095
Najafi, M., Abolmaesumi, P. & Rohling, R. Single-camera closed-form real-time needle tracking for ultrasound-guided needle insertion. Ultrasound Med. Biol.41(10), 2663–2676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.05.016 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.05.016
Kasine, T. et al. Needle tip tracking for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block procedures-an observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.63, 1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13379 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/aas.13379
Vezzani, A. et al. A randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided infra-clavicular cannulation of the subclavian vein in cardiac surgical patients: short-axis versus long-axis approach. Intensive Care Med.43(11), 1594–1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4756-6 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4756-6
McLeod, G. A. et al. An initial evaluation of the effect of a novel regional block needle with tip-tracking technology on the novice performance of cadaveric ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block. Anaesthesia https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14851 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/anae.14851
McVicar, J., Niazi, A. U., Murgatroyd, H., Chin, K. J. & Chan, V. W. Novice performance of ultrasound-guided needling skills: Effect of a needle guidance system. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med.40(2), 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000209 (2015).
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000209
Johnston, D. F. & Stafford, M. Dominant hand operating probe vs needle: A comparison study of ultrasound-guided needle placement in phantom models. Anaesthesia70(8), 969–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13070 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/anae.13070
Marhofer, P. & Fritsch, G. Safe performance of peripheral regional anaesthesia: The significance of ultrasound guidance. Anaesthesia72(4), 431–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13831 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/anae.13831
Koscielniak-Nielsen, Z. J., Stens-Pedersen, H. L. & Lippert, F. K. Readiness for surgery after axillary block: Single or multiple injection techniques. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol.14(2), 164–171 (1997).
doi: 10.1097/00003643-199703000-00008
Kåsine, T. et al. Ultrasonographic needle tip tracking for in-plane infraclavicular brachialis plexus blocks: A randomized controlled volunteer study. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med.45(8), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101349 (2020).
doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101349
Meinert, C. L. Clinical Trials: Design (Oxford University Press, 1986).
doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195035681.001.0001