Portal Vein Pulsatility: A Valuable Approach for Monitoring Venous Congestion and Prognostic Evaluation in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

congestion heart failure mortality portal vein rehospitalization

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 05 08 2024
revised: 08 09 2024
accepted: 11 09 2024
medline: 28 9 2024
pubmed: 28 9 2024
entrez: 28 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The severity of systemic congestion is associated with increased portal vein flow pulsatility (PVP). To determine the usefulness of PVP as a marker of decongestion and prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients. 105 patients, 60% of whom were men, were hospitalized with ADHF, and their PVP index (PVPI) was calculated (maximum velocity-minimum velocity/maximum velocity) × 100 on admission and before discharge, along with their EVEREST score, inferior vena cava diameter (IVC), NT-proBNP, serum sodium, and glomerular filtration rate. A PVPI ≥ 50% was defined as a marker of systemic congestion. After treatment with loop diuretics, a decrease in PVPI of >50% before discharge was considered a marker of decongestion The patients were classified into two groups (G): G1-PVPI decrease ≥ 50% (54 patients) and G2-PVPI decrease < 50% (51 patients). At discharge, compared to G2, G1 patients had lower mean PVPI (14.2 vs. 38.9; Portal vein flow pulsatility, a meaningful marker of persistent subclinical congestion, is related to short-term prognosis in ADHF patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The severity of systemic congestion is associated with increased portal vein flow pulsatility (PVP).
AIM OBJECTIVE
To determine the usefulness of PVP as a marker of decongestion and prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients.
METHODS METHODS
105 patients, 60% of whom were men, were hospitalized with ADHF, and their PVP index (PVPI) was calculated (maximum velocity-minimum velocity/maximum velocity) × 100 on admission and before discharge, along with their EVEREST score, inferior vena cava diameter (IVC), NT-proBNP, serum sodium, and glomerular filtration rate. A PVPI ≥ 50% was defined as a marker of systemic congestion. After treatment with loop diuretics, a decrease in PVPI of >50% before discharge was considered a marker of decongestion The patients were classified into two groups (G): G1-PVPI decrease ≥ 50% (54 patients) and G2-PVPI decrease < 50% (51 patients).
RESULTS RESULTS
At discharge, compared to G2, G1 patients had lower mean PVPI (14.2 vs. 38.9;
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Portal vein flow pulsatility, a meaningful marker of persistent subclinical congestion, is related to short-term prognosis in ADHF patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39335708
pii: diagnostics14182029
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182029
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Mihai Grigore (M)

Internal Medicine and Cardiology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Prof. Dr. Theodor Burghele" Clinical Hospital, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.

Andreea-Maria Grigore (AM)

Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cardiology Department Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.

Adriana-Mihaela Ilieșiu (AM)

Internal Medicine and Cardiology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Prof. Dr. Theodor Burghele" Clinical Hospital, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.

Classifications MeSH