Portal Vein Pulsatility: A Valuable Approach for Monitoring Venous Congestion and Prognostic Evaluation in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.
congestion
heart failure
mortality
portal vein
rehospitalization
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Sep 2024
13 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
05
08
2024
revised:
08
09
2024
accepted:
11
09
2024
medline:
28
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The severity of systemic congestion is associated with increased portal vein flow pulsatility (PVP). To determine the usefulness of PVP as a marker of decongestion and prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients. 105 patients, 60% of whom were men, were hospitalized with ADHF, and their PVP index (PVPI) was calculated (maximum velocity-minimum velocity/maximum velocity) × 100 on admission and before discharge, along with their EVEREST score, inferior vena cava diameter (IVC), NT-proBNP, serum sodium, and glomerular filtration rate. A PVPI ≥ 50% was defined as a marker of systemic congestion. After treatment with loop diuretics, a decrease in PVPI of >50% before discharge was considered a marker of decongestion The patients were classified into two groups (G): G1-PVPI decrease ≥ 50% (54 patients) and G2-PVPI decrease < 50% (51 patients). At discharge, compared to G2, G1 patients had lower mean PVPI (14.2 vs. 38.9; Portal vein flow pulsatility, a meaningful marker of persistent subclinical congestion, is related to short-term prognosis in ADHF patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The severity of systemic congestion is associated with increased portal vein flow pulsatility (PVP).
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To determine the usefulness of PVP as a marker of decongestion and prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients.
METHODS
METHODS
105 patients, 60% of whom were men, were hospitalized with ADHF, and their PVP index (PVPI) was calculated (maximum velocity-minimum velocity/maximum velocity) × 100 on admission and before discharge, along with their EVEREST score, inferior vena cava diameter (IVC), NT-proBNP, serum sodium, and glomerular filtration rate. A PVPI ≥ 50% was defined as a marker of systemic congestion. After treatment with loop diuretics, a decrease in PVPI of >50% before discharge was considered a marker of decongestion The patients were classified into two groups (G): G1-PVPI decrease ≥ 50% (54 patients) and G2-PVPI decrease < 50% (51 patients).
RESULTS
RESULTS
At discharge, compared to G2, G1 patients had lower mean PVPI (14.2 vs. 38.9;
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Portal vein flow pulsatility, a meaningful marker of persistent subclinical congestion, is related to short-term prognosis in ADHF patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39335708
pii: diagnostics14182029
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182029
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng