Platelet Pathogen Reduction Technology-Should We Stay or Should We Go…?
INTERCEPT®
MIRASOL®
TA-GvHD
THERAFLEX®
amotosalen
bacterial contaminations
irradiation
platelets
riboflavin
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Sep 2024
10 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
18
07
2024
revised:
16
08
2024
accepted:
26
08
2024
medline:
28
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The recent COVID-19 pandemic has significantly challenged blood transfusion services (BTS) for providing blood products and for keeping blood supplies available. The possibility that a similar pandemic event may occur again has induced researchers and transfusionists to investigate the adoption of new tools to prevent and reduce these risks. Similarly, increased donor travelling and globalization, with consequent donor deferral and donor pool reduction, have contributed to raising awareness on this topic. Although recent studies have validated the use of pathogen reduction technology (PRT) for the control of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) this method is not a standard of care despite increasing adoption. We present a critical commentary on the role of PRT for platelets and on associated problems for blood transfusion services (BTS). The balance of the cost effectiveness of adopting PRT is also discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39336845
pii: jcm13185359
doi: 10.3390/jcm13185359
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng