Controlling Prescribing through "Preferred Drug" Targets-The Bavarian Experience.

ambulatory care/economics budgets cost control/trends drug prescriptions drug therapy/economics drug therapy/trends

Journal

International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 27 07 2024
revised: 27 08 2024
accepted: 29 08 2024
medline: 29 9 2024
pubmed: 28 9 2024
entrez: 28 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The rising costs of drugs are putting health care systems under pressure. We report on the Bavarian Drug Agreement, which employs prescribing targets for preferred and generic drugs in ambulatory care. Under this agreement, providers are regularly profiled with individual feedback but also possible sanctions. We investigated the degree to which targets were being met (or not) and why failure occurred. We analysed prescribing data aggregated by practice for the quarter 1/2018. We chose eight specialisation groups and analysed their drug targets with a high prescribing volume, widely missed drug targets (<90%), and drugs preventing drug target achievement. Characterisation of drug targets and preventing drugs was undertaken. Drug targets with a high prescribing volume are mostly achieved, while highly missed drug targets mostly do not affect the main indication area of the specialisation groups considered. Generic drug targets seem to be more easily achieved than recommended drug targets. Paediatrics accounts for the largest number of missed drug targets. The Bavarian tool implemented uses the prescribing volume (DDD) and price components to evaluate the prescription behaviour of physicians. Well-established drugs with demonstrated effectiveness, safety, and lower costs are preferred. Nevertheless, me-too drugs, combination drugs, costly innovations with unclear value, and drugs with application methods of variable convenience challenge the drug prescribers and are reasons for missed drug targets.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The rising costs of drugs are putting health care systems under pressure. We report on the Bavarian Drug Agreement, which employs prescribing targets for preferred and generic drugs in ambulatory care. Under this agreement, providers are regularly profiled with individual feedback but also possible sanctions. We investigated the degree to which targets were being met (or not) and why failure occurred.
METHODS METHODS
We analysed prescribing data aggregated by practice for the quarter 1/2018. We chose eight specialisation groups and analysed their drug targets with a high prescribing volume, widely missed drug targets (<90%), and drugs preventing drug target achievement. Characterisation of drug targets and preventing drugs was undertaken.
RESULTS RESULTS
Drug targets with a high prescribing volume are mostly achieved, while highly missed drug targets mostly do not affect the main indication area of the specialisation groups considered. Generic drug targets seem to be more easily achieved than recommended drug targets. Paediatrics accounts for the largest number of missed drug targets.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The Bavarian tool implemented uses the prescribing volume (DDD) and price components to evaluate the prescription behaviour of physicians. Well-established drugs with demonstrated effectiveness, safety, and lower costs are preferred. Nevertheless, me-too drugs, combination drugs, costly innovations with unclear value, and drugs with application methods of variable convenience challenge the drug prescribers and are reasons for missed drug targets.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39338056
pii: ijerph21091174
doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091174
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Drugs, Generic 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss
ID : 01VSF17016

Auteurs

Julia Gollnick (J)

Institute of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany.

Nikoletta Zeschick (N)

Institute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstr. 29, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Julia Muth (J)

Institute of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany.

Franziska Hörbrand (F)

Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Bavaria, Elsenheimerstraße 39, 80687 München, Germany.

Kerstin Behnke (K)

Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Bavaria, Elsenheimerstraße 39, 80687 München, Germany.

Peter Killian (P)

Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Bavaria, Elsenheimerstraße 39, 80687 München, Germany.

Maria Sebastiao (M)

Institute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstr. 29, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Thomas Kühlein (T)

Institute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstr. 29, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Norbert Donner-Banzhoff (N)

Institute of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH