Evaluating Thrombolysis Rates and Emergency Department Time Targets in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Need for Personalized Medicine.

acute care acute ischemic stroke emergency department time targets patient-related factors personalized medicine rt-PA thrombolysis

Journal

Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 30 07 2024
revised: 27 08 2024
accepted: 07 09 2024
medline: 28 9 2024
pubmed: 28 9 2024
entrez: 28 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the era of personalized medicine, standard protocols regarding the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) focus on time targets alone without tailoring the protocol to the specific patient and hospital characteristics to increase IV thrombolysis rates and improve outcomes for these patients by considering organizational differences and patient-related factors that influence adherence to target times at the emergency department level. With this in mind, we evaluate the effect of achieving ED time targets from standard protocol and patient-related risk factors on the intravenous (IV) thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window. For our research, we enrolled people who arrived at the ED with signs of recent AIS with an onset of less than 4.5 h. Initially, 355 patients were included in the study, but through careful screening, only 258 were considered eligible to participate. Of the final group of 258 patients, only 46 received intravenous thrombolysis treatment. In our study, when we are analyzing ED times in patients admitted with stroke symptoms in the therapeutic window, we found statistically significantly decreased ED times for patients that performed IV thrombolysis compared to patients not performing as follows: a median of 100 min in onset-to-ED door time ( The ED time targets that significantly influenced IV thrombolysis in our study were the onset-to-ED door time and the time it takes for the ED doctor to assess the AIS patient (door-to-physician time). The IV thrombolysis rate for these patients was 17.83%, lower than expected despite achieving most ED time targets, with the presence of chronic arterial hypertension as a significant predictive patient-related factor for not performing it. Even though our reported hospital's thrombolysis rate is favorable compared to international reports, there is always room for improvement. Based on our study results, it is necessary that new protocols to customized standard protocols and ED time targets for increasing IV thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window, focusing more on patient-related factors and type of hospitals, granting personalized medicine its right. Based on our study results, it is necessary that new protocols customize standard protocols and ED time targets for increasing IV thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window, focusing more on patient-related factors and type of hospitals, granting personalized medicine its right.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
In the era of personalized medicine, standard protocols regarding the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) focus on time targets alone without tailoring the protocol to the specific patient and hospital characteristics to increase IV thrombolysis rates and improve outcomes for these patients by considering organizational differences and patient-related factors that influence adherence to target times at the emergency department level. With this in mind, we evaluate the effect of achieving ED time targets from standard protocol and patient-related risk factors on the intravenous (IV) thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
For our research, we enrolled people who arrived at the ED with signs of recent AIS with an onset of less than 4.5 h. Initially, 355 patients were included in the study, but through careful screening, only 258 were considered eligible to participate. Of the final group of 258 patients, only 46 received intravenous thrombolysis treatment.
RESULTS RESULTS
In our study, when we are analyzing ED times in patients admitted with stroke symptoms in the therapeutic window, we found statistically significantly decreased ED times for patients that performed IV thrombolysis compared to patients not performing as follows: a median of 100 min in onset-to-ED door time (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The ED time targets that significantly influenced IV thrombolysis in our study were the onset-to-ED door time and the time it takes for the ED doctor to assess the AIS patient (door-to-physician time). The IV thrombolysis rate for these patients was 17.83%, lower than expected despite achieving most ED time targets, with the presence of chronic arterial hypertension as a significant predictive patient-related factor for not performing it. Even though our reported hospital's thrombolysis rate is favorable compared to international reports, there is always room for improvement. Based on our study results, it is necessary that new protocols to customized standard protocols and ED time targets for increasing IV thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window, focusing more on patient-related factors and type of hospitals, granting personalized medicine its right. Based on our study results, it is necessary that new protocols customize standard protocols and ED time targets for increasing IV thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window, focusing more on patient-related factors and type of hospitals, granting personalized medicine its right.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39338208
pii: jpm14090955
doi: 10.3390/jpm14090955
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy
ID : Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Auteurs

Daian Ionel Popa (DI)

Doctoral School, Faculty of General Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Department of Surgery, Emergency Discipline, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Florina Buleu (F)

Department of Cardiology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Carmen Williams (C)

Emergency Municipal Clinical Hospital, 300254 Timisoara, Romania.

Anca Tudor (A)

Department of Functional Sciences, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Dumitru Sutoi (D)

Doctoral School, Faculty of General Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Department of Surgery, Emergency Discipline, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Cosmin Iosif Trebuian (CI)

Doctoral School, Faculty of General Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Department of Surgery, Emergency Discipline, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Covasala Constantin Ioan (CC)

Emergency Clinical Hospital, 310003 Arad, Romania.

Dragoș Forțofoiu (D)

Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.

Marius Badalica-Petrescu (M)

Department of Cardiology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Ion Petre (I)

Department of Functional Sciences, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Aida Iancu (A)

Department of Radiology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Ovidiu Alexandru Mederle (OA)

Department of Surgery, Emergency Discipline, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Emergency Municipal Clinical Hospital, 300254 Timisoara, Romania.

Classifications MeSH