Facilitating home birth in perinatal palliative care: A case report.

Pregnancy hospice and palliative care nursing infant midwifery newborn palliative care perinatal care

Journal

Palliative medicine
ISSN: 1477-030X
Titre abrégé: Palliat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 9 2024
pubmed: 28 9 2024
entrez: 28 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Perinatal palliative care can offer compassionate support to families following diagnosis of a life-limiting illness, to enable them to make valued choices and the most of the time that they have with their newborn. However, home birth is usually only offered in low-risk pregnancies. A couple who received an antenatal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and who had made a plan to provide palliative care to their baby after birth requested the option of a home birth. Recommend birth at hospital or explore the possibility of a home birth with perinatal palliative care support. Multidisciplinary discussion and collaboration enabled a plan for home birth to be made which anticipated potential complications. The baby was born at home and died on day 5 of life receiving outreach nursing, paediatric and palliative care support and buccal and oral opioids for symptom management. We include reflections from the family on the importance of this experience. We provide a list of potential criteria for considering home birth in the setting of perinatal palliative care. Facilitating a home birth in the setting of perinatal palliative care is an option that can be hugely valued by families, but this service may be practically difficult to deliver in many contexts. Further research is needed to understand the preferences of women and families receiving perinatal palliative care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Perinatal palliative care can offer compassionate support to families following diagnosis of a life-limiting illness, to enable them to make valued choices and the most of the time that they have with their newborn. However, home birth is usually only offered in low-risk pregnancies.
CASE UNASSIGNED
A couple who received an antenatal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and who had made a plan to provide palliative care to their baby after birth requested the option of a home birth.
POSSIBLE COURSES OF ACTION UNASSIGNED
Recommend birth at hospital or explore the possibility of a home birth with perinatal palliative care support.
FORMULATION OF A PLAN UNASSIGNED
Multidisciplinary discussion and collaboration enabled a plan for home birth to be made which anticipated potential complications.
OUTCOME UNASSIGNED
The baby was born at home and died on day 5 of life receiving outreach nursing, paediatric and palliative care support and buccal and oral opioids for symptom management. We include reflections from the family on the importance of this experience.
LESSONS UNASSIGNED
We provide a list of potential criteria for considering home birth in the setting of perinatal palliative care.
VIEW UNASSIGNED
Facilitating a home birth in the setting of perinatal palliative care is an option that can be hugely valued by families, but this service may be practically difficult to deliver in many contexts. Further research is needed to understand the preferences of women and families receiving perinatal palliative care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39340165
doi: 10.1177/02692163241280374
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2692163241280374

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Sophie Bertaud (S)

Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Rachel Kirven (R)

Independent contributor, Oxford, UK.

Thomas Kirven (T)

Independent contributor, Oxford, UK.

Emily Harrop (E)

Helen & Douglas House, Oxford, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Amanda Crudgington (A)

Florence Park Midwives Team, Maternity Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Dominic Wilkinson (D)

Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Classifications MeSH