Comparison of Early Versus Late Debridement Outcomes in the Management of Open Distal Radius Fractures.

The optimal timing for surgical treatment of open distal radius fractures remains an area of debate. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of open distal radius fractures treated surgically before or after 24 hours. A multicenter retrospective review was performed on all open distal radius fractures treated over 11 years. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, and initial treatment were recorded. Fracture severity was graded by the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Comparisons were made between those treated surgically within and after 24 hours. Outcomes examined included infection, revision surgery, osteomyelitis, and nonunion. A total of 230 cases met the inclusion criteria. The cohorts of early and delayed surgical intervention were similar with regard to preoperative demographics. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident. Approximately 40% of cases were graded as type I, 40% as type II, and 20% as type III. Mean time to debridement in the group treated after 24 hours was 5 days. A mean postoperative follow-up of greater than 6 months was obtained in both cohorts. Similar outcomes were found between cohorts with respect to postoperative infection, revision surgery, osteomyelitis, and nonunion. Similar outcomes with regards to infection, revision, osteomyelitis, and nonunion were found between open distal radius fractures treated emergently versus those managed in a delayed fashion. Patient- and injury-specific factors are important in dictating care. Prognostic IIB.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article.