[Routine application of results of a randomised trial : performance of ultrasound in dailyroutine practice for screening fetal macrosomia].

Application en routine des résultats d’un essai randomisé : performance de l’échographie en pratique courante pour le dépistage de la macrosomie fœtale.
dépistage estimation du poids fœtal fetal macrosomia fetal weight estimation macrosomie fœtale screening ultrasound échographie

Journal

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie
ISSN: 2468-7189
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101693805

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 27 07 2024
revised: 22 09 2024
accepted: 23 09 2024
medline: 29 9 2024
pubmed: 29 9 2024
entrez: 28 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate the performance of ultrasound at 36 weeks of gestation for screening fetal macrosomia according to the criteria of the randomized "DAME" trial. Méthod : Retrospective observational study over 2 years in a type 3 maternity hospital. The primary outcome was birth weight above the 97th percentile on Audipog birth weight curves. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of ultrasound at 36 SA for predicting macrosomia were calculated. For each patient, the absolute value of the difference between actual and estimated weight (EPF difference = (Birth weight - Estimated weight) / Birth weight) was calculated. Among undetected macrosomic newborns (≥ 97 Ultrasound performed at 36 weeks' gestation in a population targeted for suspected fetal macrosomia in routine practice has moderate sensitivity and positive predictive value. It would be timely for teams also applying this protocol to share their results, in order to verify whether or not our findings can be generalized to a larger scale.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39341568
pii: S2468-7189(24)00297-6
doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.09.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

English Abstract Journal Article

Langues

fre

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

Charlotte Cabaud (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy, France. Electronic address: cabaud.charlotte@gmail.com.

Juliette François (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy, France.

Pierre Capitanio (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy, France.

Claire Thuillier (C)

Paris Saclay University, UVSQ, Inserm, Team U1018, Clinical Epidemiology, CESP, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Hospital of Paris, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

Paul Berveiller (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy, France.

Patrick Rozenberg (P)

Paris Saclay University, UVSQ, Inserm, Team U1018, Clinical Epidemiology, CESP, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Hospital of Paris, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

Thibaud Quibel (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy, France; Paris Saclay University, UVSQ, Inserm, Team U1018, Clinical Epidemiology, CESP, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.

Classifications MeSH