Disease-specific interventions using cell therapies for spinal cord disease/injury.
Cell therapy
Clinical trials
Feasibility
Safety
Spinal cord injury
Stem cell therapy
Journal
Handbook of clinical neurology
ISSN: 0072-9752
Titre abrégé: Handb Clin Neurol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0166161
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
medline:
29
9
2024
pubmed:
29
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) may occur across the lifespan and is of global relevance. Damage of the spinal cord results in para- or tetraplegia and is associated with neuropathic pain, spasticity, respiratory, and autonomic dysfunction (i.e., control of bladder-bowel function). While the acute surgical treatment aims at stabilizing the spine and decompressing the damaged spinal cord, SCI patients require neurorehabilitation to restore neural function and to compensate for any impairments including motor disability, pain treatment, and bladder/bowel management. However, the spinal cord has a limited capacity to regenerate and much of the disability may persist, depending on the initial lesion severity and level of injury. For this reason, and the lack of effective drug treatments, there is an emerging interest and urgent need in promoting axonal regeneration and remyelination after SCI through cell- and stem-cell based therapies. This review briefly summarizes the state-of the art management of acute SCI and its neurorehabilitation to critically appraise phase I/II trials from the last two decades that have investigated cell-based therapies (i.e., Schwann cells, macrophages, and olfactory ensheathing cells) and stem cell-based therapies (i.e., neural stem cells, mesenchymal, and hematopoietic stem cells). Recently, two large multicenter trials provided evidence for the safety and feasibility of neural stem cell transplantation into the injured cord, whilst two monocenter trials also showed this to be the case for the transplantation of Schwann cells into the posttraumatic cord cavity. These are milestone studies that will facilitate further interventional trials. However, the clinical adoption of such approaches remains unproven, as there is only limited encouraging data, often in single patients, and no proven trial evidence to support regulatory approval.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39341658
pii: B978-0-323-90120-8.00007-1
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90120-8.00007-1
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
263-282Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.