Morphological CBCT parameters for an accurate differentiation between nasopalatine duct cyst and the normal nasopalatine canal.


Journal

Head & face medicine
ISSN: 1746-160X
Titre abrégé: Head Face Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245792

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 20 09 2023
accepted: 16 09 2024
medline: 29 9 2024
pubmed: 29 9 2024
entrez: 28 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The incisive foramen width was a traditional imaging criterion for diagnosing nasopalatine duct (NPD) cysts. Recent CBCT studies demonstrated significant dimensional variations of the nasopalatine canal, which raised questions about the accuracy of this criterion. This study investigated whether nasopalatine canal diameters assessed on CBCT images can accurately differentiate NPD cysts from normal nasopalatine canals. The study included 19 patients with NPD cysts (12 (63.2%) males, 7 (36.8%) females, mean age 44.7 ± 13.3), and a control group of 164 patients (72 (43.9%) males, 92 (56.1%) females, mean age 47.25 ± 17.74). CBCT images were retrospectively evaluated. The following nasopalatine canal diameters were measured on reference sagittal, coronal, and axial reformation images: nasal opening anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) diameter, oral opening AP (APOO) and ML (MLOO) diameter, nasopalatine canal length, minimum ML (minML) diameter, anterior wall expansion (AWE), nasopalatine canal angle, and the mid-level AP diameter (midAP). All parameters were compared between groups. Discriminant functional analysis (DFA) was applied to detect CBCT parameters that best differentiate the NPD cyst from the normal canal. Patients with NPD cyst had significantly greater values of APOO (7.06 ± 2.09 vs. 5.61 ± 1.70), MLOO (6.89 ± 2.95 vs. 3.48 ± 1.24), minML (2.88 ± 1.53 vs. 2.25 ± 1.09), AWE (2.15 ± 0.65 vs. 0.41 ± 0.67), and midAP (4.58 ± 1.61 vs. 2.48 ± 0.96). DFA showed MLOO, AWE, and midAP as the most accurate in distinguishing NPD cyst from the normal canal. When combined in the discriminant function equation X = 0.390·MLOO + 1.010·AWE + 0.288·midAP (cut score 1.669), the differentiation can be performed with a sensitivity and specificity of 98.8% and 76.9%, respectively. NPD cysts can be accurately distinguished from the normal nasopalatine canal by measuring MLOO, AWE, and midAP diameter on CBCT images.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The incisive foramen width was a traditional imaging criterion for diagnosing nasopalatine duct (NPD) cysts. Recent CBCT studies demonstrated significant dimensional variations of the nasopalatine canal, which raised questions about the accuracy of this criterion. This study investigated whether nasopalatine canal diameters assessed on CBCT images can accurately differentiate NPD cysts from normal nasopalatine canals.
METHODS METHODS
The study included 19 patients with NPD cysts (12 (63.2%) males, 7 (36.8%) females, mean age 44.7 ± 13.3), and a control group of 164 patients (72 (43.9%) males, 92 (56.1%) females, mean age 47.25 ± 17.74). CBCT images were retrospectively evaluated. The following nasopalatine canal diameters were measured on reference sagittal, coronal, and axial reformation images: nasal opening anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) diameter, oral opening AP (APOO) and ML (MLOO) diameter, nasopalatine canal length, minimum ML (minML) diameter, anterior wall expansion (AWE), nasopalatine canal angle, and the mid-level AP diameter (midAP). All parameters were compared between groups. Discriminant functional analysis (DFA) was applied to detect CBCT parameters that best differentiate the NPD cyst from the normal canal.
RESULTS RESULTS
Patients with NPD cyst had significantly greater values of APOO (7.06 ± 2.09 vs. 5.61 ± 1.70), MLOO (6.89 ± 2.95 vs. 3.48 ± 1.24), minML (2.88 ± 1.53 vs. 2.25 ± 1.09), AWE (2.15 ± 0.65 vs. 0.41 ± 0.67), and midAP (4.58 ± 1.61 vs. 2.48 ± 0.96). DFA showed MLOO, AWE, and midAP as the most accurate in distinguishing NPD cyst from the normal canal. When combined in the discriminant function equation X = 0.390·MLOO + 1.010·AWE + 0.288·midAP (cut score 1.669), the differentiation can be performed with a sensitivity and specificity of 98.8% and 76.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
NPD cysts can be accurately distinguished from the normal nasopalatine canal by measuring MLOO, AWE, and midAP diameter on CBCT images.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39342234
doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00458-6
pii: 10.1186/s13005-024-00458-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

54

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Langlais RP, Langland OE, Nortjé CJ, editors. Diagnostic imaging of the jaws. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
Sane VD, Gadre KS, Halli R, Singh V, Doshi P, Saddiwal R, Thopte S. Role of Cone-Beam computed tomography in diagnosis and management of Nasopalatine Duct Cyst. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(1):e92–4.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000427 pubmed: 24406616
Swanson KS, Kaugars GE, Gunsolley JC. Nasopalatine duct cyst: an analysis of 334 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:268.
doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90217-A pubmed: 1995816
Suter VG, Sendi P, Reichart PA, Bornstein M. The nasopalatine duct cyst: an analysis of the relation between clinical symptoms, cyst dimensions, and involvement of neighboring anatomical structures using cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2595–603.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.032 pubmed: 21398010
Suter VG, Büttner M, Altermatt HJ, Reichart PA, Bornstein MM. Expansive nasopalatine duct cysts with nasal involvement mimicking apical lesions of endodontic origin: a report of two cases. J Endod. 2011;37:1320–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.041 pubmed: 21846558
Hilfer PB, Bergeron BE, Ozgul ES, Wong DK. Misdiagnosis of a nasopalatine duct cyst: a case report. J Endod. 2013;39:1185–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.033 pubmed: 23953296
Levy DH, Dinur N, Becker T, Azizi H, Itzhak JB, Solomonov M. Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the diagnosis of infected Nasopalatine Duct Cyst mimicking chronic apical abscess: a Case Report. JOE. 2021;47(7):1177–81.
pubmed: 33901546
Hisatomi M, Asaumi J, Konouchi H, Matsuzaki H, Kishi K. MR imaging of nasopalatine duct cysts. Eur J Radiol. 2001;39(2):73–6.
doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00279-0 pubmed: 11522412
White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2009.
Wright JM, Vered M. Update from the 4th edition of the World Health Organization classification of head and neck Tumours. Odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors. Head Neck Pathol. 2017;11:68–77.
doi: 10.1007/s12105-017-0794-1 pubmed: 28247226 pmcid: 5340735
Thakur AR, Burde K, Guttal K, Naikmasur VG. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canals using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43:273.
doi: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.4.273 pubmed: 24380067 pmcid: 3873316
Ueda N, Tanaka T, Oda M, Wakasugi-Sato N, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Miyamura Y, Jyoujima T, Kiyota K, Tsutsumi K, Morimoto Y. Advocacy of diagnostic criteria for maxillary incisive canal cysts based on alteration of normal maxillary incisive canals according to aging in Japanese populations. Head Face Med. 2019;15:25.
doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0209-5 pubmed: 31640721 pmcid: 6805562
Friedrich RE, Laumann F, Zrnc T, Assaf AT. The Nasopalatine Canal in adults on Cone Beam Computed Tomograms–A Clinical Study and Review of the literature. vivo. 2015;29:467–86.
Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, van Cleynenbreugel J, Sanderink G, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:396–402.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/53801969 pubmed: 15665234
Suter VG, Warnakulasuriya S, Reichart PA, Bornstein MM. Radiographic volume analysis as a novel tool to determine nasopalatine duct cyst dimensions and its association with presenting symptoms and postoperative complications. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(7):1611–8.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1391-2 pubmed: 25579059
Bornstein MM, Balsiger R, Sendi P, von Arx T. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:295–301.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02010.x pubmed: 21039896
Fernández-Alonso A, Antonio Suárez-Quintanilla J, Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Varela-Mallou J, Chamosa ES, Suarez-Cunqueiro MM. Critical anatomic region of nasopalatine canal based on tridimensional analysis: cone beam computed tomography. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12568.
doi: 10.1038/srep12568 pubmed: 26245884 pmcid: 4526882
Jain NV, Gharatkar AA, Parekh BA, Musani SI, Shah UD. Three-dimensional analysis of the anatomical characteristics and dimensions of the Nasopalatine Canal using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017;16(2):197–204.
doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0879-5 pubmed: 28439161
Fernández-Alonso A, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Bornstein MM, Blonco-Carrion A, Suarez-Cunqueiro MM. Three-dimensional study of nasopalatine canal morphology: a descriptive retrospective analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(9):895–905.
doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1297-3 pubmed: 24752396
AlQanhtani M, AlDossari A, Nasser A, AlOtaibi. Nasopalatine duct cyst: a diagnostic dilemma. Dent Oral Craniofac Res. 2018;4(4):1–6.
Vasconcelos R, de Aguiar MF, Castro W, Araujo VC, Mesquita R. Retrospective analysis of 31 cases of nasopalatine duct cyst. Oral Dis. 1999;5:325.
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1999.tb00098.x pubmed: 10561722
Anneroth G, Hall G, Stuge U. Nasopalatine duct cyst. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:572.
doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80061-8 pubmed: 3097183
Allard RH, van der Kwast WA, van der Waal I. Nasopalatine duct cyst: review of the literature and report of 22 cases. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:447.
doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80081-6 pubmed: 6809666
Bodin I, Isacsson G, Julin P. Cysts of the nasopalatine duct. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:696.
doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80110-7 pubmed: 3100671
Nortjé CJ, Wood RE. The radiologic features of the nasopalatine duct cyst. An analysis of 46 cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1988;17:129.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.1988.0017 pubmed: 3271698
Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36:805–12.
doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1259-9 pubmed: 24488202
Guncu GN, Yıldırım YD, Yılmaz HG, Galindo-Moreno P, Velasco-Torres M, Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Shawaf R, Karabulut E, Wang HL, Tozum TF. Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1023–6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02493.x pubmed: 22587805
Al-Amery SM, Nambiar P, Jamaludin M, John J, Ngeow WC. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of anatomical variations when placing immediate implants. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0117251.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117251 pubmed: 25679505 pmcid: 4332502

Auteurs

Aleksa Janovic (A)

School of Dental Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Radiology, University of Belgrade, 6 Rankeova, Belgrade, 11 000, Serbia. aleksa.janovic@stomf.bg.ac.rs.

Djurdja Bracanovic (D)

School of Dental Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Radiology, University of Belgrade, 6 Rankeova, Belgrade, 11 000, Serbia.

Svetlana Antic (S)

School of Dental Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Radiology, University of Belgrade, 6 Rankeova, Belgrade, 11 000, Serbia.

Biljana Markovic-Vasiljkovic (B)

School of Dental Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Radiology, University of Belgrade, 6 Rankeova, Belgrade, 11 000, Serbia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH