Assessment of Lactococcus Cremoris preparations for the pre- and post-milking teat disinfection.
Bacteriological analysis
Dipping
Mastitis
Nisin
Somatic cell count
Journal
BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Sep 2024
28 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
05
12
2023
accepted:
17
09
2024
medline:
29
9
2024
pubmed:
29
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Good hygienic milking practices including the disinfection of the cow teat skin before and after milking aimed at preventing the occurrence of new intramammary infections (IMI) in dairy cows. This practice is generally performed using disinfectants, and in the current context of attention to the emergence of resistances, it is of greatest interest to evaluate alternative solutions that can expand treatment options. We assessed the efficacy of a pre-dipping and a post-dipping product based on the bacteriocin-containing culture of Lactococcus cremoris strain FT27, as compared to commercial disinfectants. FT27 was selected for the bactericidal activity in vitro against food pathogens. In the present study, it also revealed a high bactericidal activity against the main mastitis pathogens, most likely related to Nisin A production, according to genomic and proteomic analysis. The lactococcus-based preparations were applied in two commercial dairy farms in Northern Italy. Overall, 298 dairy cows were enrolled, 141 in the treated group (TR), and 157 in the control group (CTR). The cows were sampled at quarter level every two weeks for 3 months. During the trial, all cows showed a good health status. The hygiene level for udder, flanks and legs was generally good (on average < 3 score); the udder hygiene was significantly worse (P < 0.01) in the CTR group. The teat apex hyperkeratosis was overall low (on average < 2 score). We recorded no significant differences between the two experimental groups in the Somatic Cell Count (SCC) values and the bacteriological results. The overall frequency of new IMI was low, ranging 0.6 - 0.5% for S. aureus in the TR or CTR group respectively, to 2.6-4.4% for NASM. Regarding Str. spp., the new IMI accounted for 1.7% or 1.9% in the TR or CTR group, respectively. Notably, the incidence of S. aureus new IMI did not increase during the study, even though neither of the two herds segregated the positive cows. The non-inferiority test showed that the Lactococcus-based pre- and post-dipping products had an efficacy comparable to proven commercial disinfectants in maintaining udder health and preventing new IMI, thus representing a possible alternative to current teat dip products.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39342256
doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04290-7
pii: 10.1186/s12917-024-04290-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Disinfectants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
432Subventions
Organisme : Regione Lombardia
ID : D.d.s. 21.12.2018 n. 19442
Organisme : Regione Lombardia
ID : D.d.s. 21.12.2018 n. 19442
Organisme : Regione Lombardia
ID : D.d.s. 21.12.2018 n. 19442
Organisme : Regione Lombardia
ID : D.d.s. 21.12.2018 n. 19442
Organisme : Regione Lombardia
ID : D.d.s. 21.12.2018 n. 19442
Organisme : Regione Lombardia
ID : D.d.s. 21.12.2018 n. 19442
Organisme : Regione Lombardia
ID : D.d.s. 21.12.2018 n. 19442
Organisme : Regione Lombardia
ID : D.d.s. 21.12.2018 n. 19442
Organisme : Regione Autonoma Sardegna
ID : art. 9 LR 20/2015
Organisme : Regione Autonoma Sardegna
ID : art. 9 LR 20/2015
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Ruegg PL. A 100-year review: mastitis detection, management, and prevention. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100:10381–97.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13023
pubmed: 29153171
Zucali M, Bava L, Tamburini A, Brasca M, Vanoni L, Sandrucci A. Effects of season, milking routine and cow cleanliness on bacterial and somatic cell counts of bulk tank milk. J Dairy Res. 2011;78:436–41.
doi: 10.1017/S0022029911000598
pubmed: 21843397
Neijenhuis F, Barkema HW, Hogeveen H, Noordhuizen JP. Relationship between teat-end callosity and occurrence of clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2001;84:2664–72.
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74720-0
pubmed: 11814022
Castro SIB, Berthiaume R, Robichaud A, Lacasse P. Effects of iodine intake and teat-dipping practices on milk iodine concentrations in dairy cows. 2012;95:213–20.
Flachowsky G, Franke K, Meyer U, Leiterer M, Schöne F. Influencing factors on iodine content of cow milk. Eur J Nutr. 2014;53:351–65.
doi: 10.1007/s00394-013-0597-4
pubmed: 24185833
Zhelev G. Bacterial resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants – minireview. Bulg J Vet Med. 2021;24:307–16.
doi: 10.15547/bjvm.2019-0085
Seier-Petersen MA, Jasni A, Aarestrup FM, Vigre H, Mullany P, Roberts AP, Agersø Y. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of four commonly used biocides on the conjugative transfer of Tn916 in Bacillus subtilis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:343–8.
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt370
pubmed: 24092655
Davin-Regli A, Pagès JM. Cross-resistance between biocides and antimicrobials: an emerging question. Rev Sci Tech. 2012;31:89–104.
pubmed: 22849270
Cremonesi P, Morandi S, Ceccarani C, et al. raw milk microbiota modifications as affected by chlorine usage for cleaning procedures: the trentingrana PDO case. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:564749.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.564749
pubmed: 33123103
pmcid: 7573252
Oftedal TF, Ovchinnikov KV, Hestad KA, Goldbeck O, Porcellato D, Narvhus J, Riedel CU, Kjos M, Diep DB. Ubericin K, a New Pore-Forming Bacteriocin Targeting mannose-PTS. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(2):e0029921. https://doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00299-21 .
Song AAL, In LL, Lim SHE, Rahim RA. A review on Lactococcus lactis: from food to factory. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16:1–15.
Lahiri D, Nag M, Dutta B, et al. Bacteriocin: a natural approach for food safety and food security. 2022;10:1005918.
Godoy-Santos F, Pinto MS, Barbosa AAT, Brito MAVP, Mantovani HC. Efficacy of a ruminal bacteriocin against pure and mixed cultures of bovine mastitis pathogens. Indian J Microbiol. 2019;59:304–12.
doi: 10.1007/s12088-019-00799-w
pubmed: 31388207
pmcid: 6646609
Castelani L, Arcaro JRP, Braga JEP, Bosso AS, Moura Q, Esposito F, Sauter IP, Cortez M, Lincopan N. Short communication: Activity of nisin, lipid bilayer fragments and cationic nisin-lipid nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus spp. isolated from bovine mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102:678–83.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15171
pubmed: 30415844
Bennett S, Fliss I, Ben Said L, Malouin F, Lacasse P. Efficacy of bacteriocin-based formula for reducing staphylococci, Streptococci, and total bacterial counts on teat skin of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105:4498–507.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21381
pubmed: 35346465
Yu J, Ren Y, Xi X, Huang W, Zhang H. A novel lactobacilli-based teat disinfectant for improving bacterial communities in the milks of cow teats with subclinical mastitis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1782.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01782
pubmed: 29018412
pmcid: 5622921
Pereira BMP, Wang X, Tagkopoulos I. Biocide-induced emergence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:640923.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.640923
He G-X, Landry M, Chen H, Thorpe C, Walsh D, Varela MF, Pan H. Detection of benzalkonium chloride resistance in community environmental isolates of staphylococci. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63:735–41.
doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.073072-0
pubmed: 24586033
pmcid: 7304898
Klostermann K, Crispie F, Flynn J, Meaney WJ, Paul Ross R, Hill C. Efficacy of a teat dip containing the bacteriocin lacticin 3147 to eliminate gram-positive pathogens associated with bovine mastitis. 2010;77:231–8.
Chen J, van Heel AJ, Kuipers OP. Subcellular localization and assembly process of the nisin biosynthesis machinery in lactococcus lactis. mBio. 2020;11:e02825-20.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.02825-20
pubmed: 33173006
pmcid: 7667030
Wu J, Zang M, Wang S, Zhao B, Bai J, Xu C, Shi Y, Qiao X. Nisin: from a structural and meat preservation perspective. Food Microbiol. 2023;111:104207.
doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104207
pubmed: 36681394
Ibarra-Sánchez LA, El-Haddad N, Mahmoud D, Miller MJ, Karam L. Invited review: advances in nisin use for preservation of dairy products. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103:2041–52.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17498
pubmed: 31928749
Knerr PJ, van der Donk WA. Discovery, biosynthesis, and engineering of lantipeptides. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:479–505.
Gleeson DE, O’Callaghan EJ, Rath M. The effects of genotype, milking time and teat-end vacuum pattern on the severity of teat-end hyperkeratosis. 2003;42:195–203.
Morandi S, Silvetti T, Vezzini V, Morozzo E, Brasca M. How we can improve the antimicrobial performances of lactic acid bacteria? A new strategy to control Listeria monocytogenes in Gorgonzola cheese. Food Microbiol. 2020;90:103488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2020.103488 .
Malvisi M, Stuknytė M, Magro G, Minozzi G, Giardini A, De Noni I, Piccinini R. Antibacterial activity and immunomodulatory effects on a bovine mammary epithelial cell line exerted by nisin A-producing Lactococcus lactis strains. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(3):2288–96. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10161 .
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 .
Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):359–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1322 .
Tanca A, Abbondio M, Pisanu S, Pagnozzi D, Uzzau S, Addis MF. Critical comparison of sample preparation strategies for shotgun proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples: insights from liver tissue. Clin Proteomics. 2014;11(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-11-28 .
Pisanu S, Cubeddu T, Pagnozzi D, Rocca S, Cacciotto C, Alberti A, Marogna G, Uzzau S, Addis MF. Neutrophil extracellular traps in sheep mastitis. 2015;46:59.
Addis MF, Pisanu S, Monistero V, et al. Comparative secretome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus strains with different within-herd intramammary infection prevalence. Virulence. 2022;13:174–90.
doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.2024014
pubmed: 35030987
pmcid: 8765078
Pongtharangkul T, Demirci A. Evaluation of agar diffusion bioassay for nisin quantification. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;65:268–72.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1579-5
pubmed: 14963617
Oliver S, Lewis M, Gillespie B, Dowlen HH, Jaenicke E, Roberts R. Microbiological procedures for the diagnosis of bovine udder infection and determination of milk quality. 4th ed. Verona: National Mastitis Council; 2004.
Mein G, Neijenhuis F, Morgan W, et al. Evaluation of bovine Teat Condition in commercial dairy herds: 1. Non-Infectious Factors; 2001.
Schreiner DA, Ruegg PL. Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. 2003;86:3460–5.
National Mastitis Council. (2017) Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. https://www.nmconline.org/2017/02/11/nmc-publishes-laboratory-handbook-on-bovine-mastitis-3rd-edition/
Godden SM, Royster E, Knauer W, Sorg J, Lopez-Benavides M, Schukken Y, Leibowitz S, French EA. Randomized noninferiority study evaluating the efficacy of a postmilking teat disinfectant for the prevention of naturally occurring intramammary infections. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99:3675–87.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10379
pubmed: 26947287