Choosing the optimal combination of lungs lobe evaluation during focused pulmonary ultrasonography in calves.

Bovine respiratory disease Monitoring Pulmonary lobes Spontaneous cough

Journal

Journal of dairy science
ISSN: 1525-3198
Titre abrégé: J Dairy Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985126R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 17 05 2024
accepted: 26 08 2024
medline: 30 9 2024
pubmed: 30 9 2024
entrez: 29 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) poses significant challenges on beef and dairy farms, impacting mortality rates, animal welfare, and production efficiency. Although pulmonary ultrasonography is highly sensitive and specific for monitoring lung lesions and diagnosing BRD, its practical application could be optimized by focusing on the most commonly affected lung lobes. This study first evaluated the efficacy of focused lung ultrasonography for diagnosing BRD in calves, examining individual lung lobes and their associations versus the extensive lung scanning under various disease prevalence scenarios. Then, the relationship between individual and combined clinical respiratory signs vs lung consolidation was analyzed. In a combined analysis, 193 Holstein calves from a longitudinal study and 112 Angus calves from a cross-sectional study underwent a total of 1265 complete bilateral thoracic ultrasonographic evaluations from 1 to 6 mo of age. Then, it was assessed the agreement and sensitivity of specific lung lobe combinations compared with the findings from total lung ultrasonography. The Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm was used to suggest an optimal examination sequence, and logistic regression was applied to associate specific clinical signs with the presence of lung consolidation adjusting for breed and calf age. Findings reveal that the most sensitive areas are cranial (K: 0.867; Se: 84.7%) and the caudal (K: 0.433; Se: 40.3%) portions of the right cranial lobe, the caudal portion (K: 0.235; Se: 20.6%) of the left cranial lobe, and the middle lobe (K: 0.25; Se: 22%). The optimal lobe combinations for focused lung ultrasonography were identified as the right cranial lobe paired with either the left cranial lobe or the middle lobe. Focused techniques achieved sensitivity over 94% and maintained good agreement. Using these focused techniques were relatively robust to various true lung consolidation scenarios. CART analysis recommended initiating examinations with the right cranial lobe, proceeding to the left cranial lobe, and concluding with the middle lobe. While spontaneous cough was linked to pneumonia presence, reliance on a single clinical sign is not advised due to low sensitivity (26.8%) and high specificity (85.4%); it should merely prompt further ultrasound assessment. In conclusion, focused lung ultrasonography, especially utilizing the right cranial lobe in conjunction with the left cranial lobe or the middle lobe, emerged as effective strategies for focused pulmonary ultrasonography, preserving the accuracy of the results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39343211
pii: S0022-0302(24)01162-7
doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25186
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Auteurs

G Anteveli (G)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

J P Andrade (JP)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

B A Alves (BA)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

J P Matiello (JP)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

G S Lemos (GS)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

C S Oliveira (CS)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

D L Cruz (DL)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

R R Nicolino (RR)

Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

E J Facury Filho (EJF)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

R M Meneses (RM)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

A U Carvalho (AU)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.

S Buczinski (S)

Département des Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.

T F Moreira (TF)

Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil. Electronic address: tiagofacuryvet@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH