Assessing the Electrode Configuration in a Sandbox System for the Removal of Sulfanilamide: A Pilot Study.

Carbon fiber Electrochemical oxidation Electrode configuration Groundwater Sulfanilamide e-barrier

Journal

Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 30 06 2024
revised: 19 09 2024
accepted: 20 09 2024
medline: 30 9 2024
pubmed: 30 9 2024
entrez: 29 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Electrochemical oxidation has emerged as an effective and straightforward technology for groundwater remediation. While recent studies have investigated parameters such as current, electrolyte composition, and electrode materials, most have been conducted using small-scale batch or flow reactors, limiting their applicability to real-world conditions. In this study, a pilot-scale sandbox reactor was employed to simulate realistic groundwater conditions and assess the removal of sulfanilamide, a model organic contaminant. Various electrode configurations were systematically evaluated to identify the key operational parameters influencing pollutant removal efficiency, providing insights for practical applications in groundwater treatment. This study proposes three configurations, including a single well with the anode and cathode, a double well with the separated anode and cathode, and an e-barrier with electrodes separately mounted inside a permeable barrier. Single well had the lowest removal efficiency (60%) because cathodic reaction inhibited the anodic oxidation. A double well with a separate anode and cathode can achieve 80% removal efficiency. However, effluent pH can reach up to 13.2, which can adversely impact groundwater. Meanwhile, the e-barrier not only achieved complete removal, but also maintained a neutral pH of 7.0 over 30 days. The e-barriers proved to be the most effective configuration based on their removal efficiency (100%) while yielding an effluent with neutral pH. The energy consumption of the e-barrier was most effective at 1.54 kWh/m

Identifiants

pubmed: 39343320
pii: S0045-6535(24)02290-2
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143392
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

143392

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☒The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

Auteurs

Jong-Gook Kim (JG)

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston 02115, MA, USA; Department of Environment and Energy and Soil Environment Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin, Jeonju, Jeollabukdo 54896, Republic of Korea.

Hye-Bin Kim (HB)

Department of Animal Environment, National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS), Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea.

Muhammad Fahad Ehsan (MF)

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston 02115, MA, USA.

Akram N Alshawabkeh (AN)

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston 02115, MA, USA.

Kitae Baek (K)

Department of Environment and Energy and Soil Environment Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin, Jeonju, Jeollabukdo 54896, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kbaek@jbnu.ac.kr.

Classifications MeSH