Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale.
Attitude to coercion
Health personnel
Mental health
Psychiatry
Reliability
Türkiye
Validity
Journal
BMC psychology
ISSN: 2050-7283
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Sep 2024
29 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
13
06
2024
accepted:
18
09
2024
medline:
30
9
2024
pubmed:
30
9
2024
entrez:
29
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to provide the Turkish version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) and to determine its psychometric properties. This is a descriptive and correlation design. The sample of this study consisted of 100 psychiatric staff members. The validity and reliability of the scale were assessed through translation procedures, content validity analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was further evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and item-total score correlations. The content validity index was found to be 0.93. The scale has a three-factor structure and the Cronbach's alpha values of the subscales are 0.70 for offence, 0.87 for safety and 0.74 for treatment, respectively. The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of the total scale was found to be 0.86. The Turkish version of the SACS showed good reliability and validity, and confirmatory factor analysis revealed the same factor structure with three factors as in the original SACS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to provide the Turkish version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) and to determine its psychometric properties.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a descriptive and correlation design. The sample of this study consisted of 100 psychiatric staff members. The validity and reliability of the scale were assessed through translation procedures, content validity analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was further evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and item-total score correlations.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The content validity index was found to be 0.93. The scale has a three-factor structure and the Cronbach's alpha values of the subscales are 0.70 for offence, 0.87 for safety and 0.74 for treatment, respectively. The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of the total scale was found to be 0.86.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The Turkish version of the SACS showed good reliability and validity, and confirmatory factor analysis revealed the same factor structure with three factors as in the original SACS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39343953
doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02013-z
pii: 10.1186/s40359-024-02013-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
517Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Chieze M, et al. Coercive measures in psychiatry: a review of ethical arguments. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:790886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.790886 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.790886
pubmed: 34970171
pmcid: 8712490
Efkemann SA, et al. A German version of the staff attitude to coercion scale. Development and empirical validation. Front Psychiatry. 2021;11:573240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573240 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573240
pubmed: 33536947
pmcid: 7847975
Krieger E, et al. Coercion in psychiatry: a cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021;28(2):149–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12643 .
doi: 10.1111/jpm.12643
pubmed: 32348607
Raveesh B, et al. Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2016;58(Suppl 2):S221. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.196847 .
doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196847
pubmed: 28216773
pmcid: 5282619
Vandamme A, et al. The role of implicit and explicit staff attitudes in the use of coercive measures in psychiatry. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:699446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.699446 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.699446
pubmed: 34220595
pmcid: 8249742
Sethi F, et al. Restraint in mental health settings: is it time to declare a position? Br J Psychiatry. 2018;212(3):137–41. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2017.31 .
doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.31
pubmed: 30071907
Sashidharan SP, Mezzina R, Puras D. Reducing coercion in mental healthcare. Epidemiol Psychiatric Sci. 2019;28(6):605–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796019000350 .
doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000350
Gooding P, McSherry B, Roper C. Preventing and reducing ‘coercion’in mental health services: an international scoping review of English-language studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2020;142(1):27–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13152 .
doi: 10.1111/acps.13152
pubmed: 31953847
pmcid: 7496148
Zinkler M, von Peter S. End coercion in mental health services—toward a system based on support only. Laws. 2019;8(3):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8030019 .
doi: 10.3390/laws8030019
Husum TL. Staff attitudes and use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards in Norway. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-010-0259-2
Happell B, Koehn S. Scratching beneath the surface: influencing factors on nurses’ attitudes toward the use of seclusion. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2011;32(7):449–56. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2011.566981 .
doi: 10.3109/01612840.2011.566981
pubmed: 21736468
Bregar B, Skela-Savič B, Kores B, Plesničar. Cross-sectional study on nurses’ attitudes regarding coercive measures: the importance of socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, and strategies for coping with stress. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1756-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1756-1
Doedens P, et al. Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services—A systematic review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020;27(4):446–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12586 .
doi: 10.1111/jpm.12586
pubmed: 31876970
pmcid: 7508163
BAKANLIĞI S. ULUSAL RUH SAĞLIĞI EYLEM PLANI (2011–2023).
Husum TL, Finset A, Ruud T. The Staff attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS): reliability, validity and feasibility. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008;31(5):417–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.002
pubmed: 18817973
Kiejna A, et al. The Staff attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS)-Polish adaptation. Psychiatr Pol. 2020;54(1):113–24. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/102438 .
doi: 10.12740/PP/102438
pubmed: 32447360
Husum TL, et al. Measurement Properties of the staff attitude to Coercion Scale: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:744661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.744661 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.744661
pubmed: 35573326
pmcid: 9095955
Karakoç AGDFY, Dönmez L. Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 2014. 13(40): pp. 39–49. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.228738
Lickiewicz J, et al. Measuring staff attitudes to coercion in Poland. Front Psychiatry. 2021;1857. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745215 .
Arab M, Gray S, Hamouzadeh P. Validation of the staff attitude toward coercion use in treatment of mentally ill patients questionnaire in selected public psychiatric hospitals of Tehran in 2015. J Hosp. 2017;16(3):31–42.
Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5(4):194–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4 .
doi: 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147 .
doi: 10.1002/nur.20147
pubmed: 16977646
Bujang MA, Omar ED, Baharum NA. A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. Malaysian J Med Sciences: MJMS. 2018;25(6):85. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9 .
doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9
Gürbüz S. AMOS Ile yapısal eşitlik Modellemesi. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2019.