Measuring Self-Care: A Description of the Family of Disease-Specific and Generic Instruments Based on the Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness.
Journal
The Journal of cardiovascular nursing
ISSN: 1550-5049
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8703516
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Sep 2024
30 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline:
30
9
2024
pubmed:
30
9
2024
entrez:
30
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In recent years, there has been an exponential increase in attention paid to the patient-reported outcome of self-care. Many investigators have used one of the families of self-care instruments freely available on the website www.self-care-measures.com. These self-care measures have been translated into many languages, which are also available on the website. The measures include both disease-specific and generic instruments, which are based on a common theoretical framework, the Middle Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness. The purpose of this article is to illustrate similarities among the instruments and to standardize their scoring, analysis, and use. We describe the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index, the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory, the Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory, the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory, the Self-Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory, the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory, and the Self-Care Inventory. Detailed guidance on scoring, translation, and analysis is provided. Complementary measures of self-care self-efficacy and those used to measure caregiver contributions to patient self-care are briefly described. Many of the common questions of instrument users are answered in this article. Following this guidance will facilitate consistent use of the instruments, which will enable users to compare their results to those of others worldwide and facilitate future reviews and meta-analyses.Clinical ImplicationsThis review, emphasizing standard scoring and interpretation, is useful for clinicians and researchers across various populations and settings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In recent years, there has been an exponential increase in attention paid to the patient-reported outcome of self-care. Many investigators have used one of the families of self-care instruments freely available on the website www.self-care-measures.com. These self-care measures have been translated into many languages, which are also available on the website. The measures include both disease-specific and generic instruments, which are based on a common theoretical framework, the Middle Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this article is to illustrate similarities among the instruments and to standardize their scoring, analysis, and use. We describe the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index, the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory, the Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory, the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory, the Self-Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory, the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory, and the Self-Care Inventory. Detailed guidance on scoring, translation, and analysis is provided. Complementary measures of self-care self-efficacy and those used to measure caregiver contributions to patient self-care are briefly described.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Many of the common questions of instrument users are answered in this article. Following this guidance will facilitate consistent use of the instruments, which will enable users to compare their results to those of others worldwide and facilitate future reviews and meta-analyses.Clinical ImplicationsThis review, emphasizing standard scoring and interpretation, is useful for clinicians and researchers across various populations and settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39344012
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000001146
pii: 00005082-990000000-00226
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Références
Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Stromberg A. A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2012;35(3):194–204. doi:10.1097/ANS.0b013e318261b1ba.
doi: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e318261b1ba
Jaarsma T, Cameron J, Riegel B, Stromberg A. Factors related to self-care in heart failure patients according to the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness: a literature update. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017;14(2):71–77. doi:10.1007/s11897-017-0324-1.
doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0324-1
Locatelli G, Matus A, Lin CY, Moser DK, Vellone E, Riegel B. Insular impairments in chronic physical diseases: a systematic review. under review.
Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Lee CS, Stromberg A. Integrating symptoms into the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2019;42(3):206–215. doi:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000237.
doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000237
Riegel B, De Maria M, Barbaranelli C, et al. Symptom recognition as a mediator in the self-care of chronic illness. Front Public Health. 2022;10:883299. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.883299.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.883299
Taylor CA, Bouldin ED, Greenlund KJ, McGuire LC. Comorbid chronic conditions among older adults with subjective cognitive decline, United States, 2015–2017. Innov Aging. 2020;4(1):igz045. doi:10.1093/geroni/igz045.
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz045
De Maria M. Generic and disease-specific self-care instruments in older patients affected by multiple chronic conditions: a descriptive study. J Clin Nurs. in press.
Riegel B, Dickson VV. A situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;23(3):190–196. doi:10.1097/01.JCN.0000305091.35259.85.
doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000305091.35259.85
Riegel B, Dickson VV, Faulkner KM. The situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care: revised and updated. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;31(3):226–235. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000244.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000244
Riegel B, Barbaranelli C, Carlson B, et al. Psychometric testing of the revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019;34(2):183–192. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000543.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000543
Riegel B, Lee CS, Dickson VV, Carlson B. An update on the self-care of heart failure index. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;24(6):485–497. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b4baa0.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b4baa0
Vellone E, Riegel B, Cocchieri A, et al. Psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 6.2. Res Nurs Health. 2013;36(5):500–511. doi:10.1002/nur.21554.
doi: 10.1002/nur.21554
Avila CW, Riegel B, Pokorski SC, Camey S, Silveira LCJ, Rabelo-Silva ER. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the brazilian version of the self-care of heart failure index version 6.2. Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:178976. doi:10.1155/2013/178976.
doi: 10.1155/2013/178976
Koirala B, Budhathoki C, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR, Bhattarai P, Davidson PM. The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index: a psychometric study. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(3–4):645–652. doi:10.1111/jocn.15119.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15119
Juárez-Vela R, Durante A, Antonio-Oriola R, et al. Transcultural adaptation and theoretical models of validation of the Spanish version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 6.2 (SCHFI v.6.2). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):569. doi:10.3390/ijerph18020569.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020569
Qiu C, Yu DS-F, Li PW-C, Riegel B. Psychometric evaluation of the traditional Chinese version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 7.2. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000001089.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000001089
Fraker TD Jr., Fihn SD, et al; 2002 Chronic Stable Angina Writing Committee; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association. 2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to develop the focused update of the 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(23):2264–74. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.002
Dickson VV, Lee CS, Yehle KS, Mola A, Faulkner KM, Riegel B. Psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory (SC-CHDI). Res Nurs Health. 2017;40(1):15–22.
Dickson VV, Iovino P, De Maria M, et al. Psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000952.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000952
Koson N, Srisuk N, Rattanaprom A, Thompson DR, Ski CF. Psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;22(3):311–319. doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvac069.
doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac069
Bayrak B, Oguz S. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory. Int J Nurs Pract. 2021;27(1):e12847. doi:10.1111/ijn.12847.
doi: 10.1111/ijn.12847
Chen Z, Chen Y, Geng J, Wang M, Yu H. Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory. Int J Nurs Pract. 2021;27(2):e12885. doi:10.1111/ijn.12885.
doi: 10.1111/ijn.12885
Dickson VV, Fletcher J, Riegel B. Psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory Version 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(5):411–419. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000827.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000827
Dickson VV, Lee C, Yehle KS, Abel WM, Riegel B. Psychometric testing of the self-care of hypertension inventory. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017;32(5):431–438. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000364.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000364
Zhao Q, Guo Y, Gu Y, Yang L. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Chinese version of the self-care of hypertension inventory in older adults. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019;34(2):124–129. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000522.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000522
Swiatoniowska-Lonc N, Polanski J, Jankowska-Polanska B. Psychometric properties of the polish version of the self-care of hypertension inventory. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(5):437–445. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000776.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000776
Suwanno J, Phonphet C, Thiamwong L, Mayurapak C, Ninla-Aesong P. Evaluating the dimensionality and reliability of the Thai Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory Version 2.0. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2022;S1976-1317(22)00039-1. doi:10.1016/j.anr.2022.08.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2022.08.002
Phonphet C, Suwanno J, Thiamwong L, Mayurapak C, Ninla-Aesong P. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the self-care of hypertension inventory for Thais with hypertension. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;38(2):179–191. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000895.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000895
Silveira LCJ, De Maria M, Dickson VV, Avila CW, Rabelo-Silva ER, Vellone E. Validity and reliability of the self-care of hypertension inventory (SC-HI) in a Brazilian population. Heart Lung. 2020;49(5):518–523. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.02.048.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.02.048
Silveira LCJ, Rabelo-Silva ER, Avila CW, Beltrami Moreira L, Dickson VV, Riegel B. Cross-cultural adaptation of the self-care of hypertension inventory into Brazilian Portuguese. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018;33(3):289–295. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000442.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000442
Metin ZG, Eren MG, Ozsurekci C, Cankurtaran M. Turkish validity and reliability of the self-care of hypertension inventory (SC-HI) among older adults. J Community Health Nurs. 2023;40(1):64–77. doi:10.1080/07370016.2022.2078163.
doi: 10.1080/07370016.2022.2078163
Alsaqer K, Bebis H. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Arabic version of the self-care of hypertension inventory Scale among older adults. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(5):430–436. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000738.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000738
Ausili D, Barbaranelli C, Rossi E, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a theory-based tool to measure self-care in diabetes patients: the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory. BMC Endocr Disord. 2017;17(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12902-017-0218-y.
doi: 10.1186/s12902-017-0218-y
De Maria M, Fabrizi D, Luciani M, et al. Further evidence of psychometric performance of the self-care of diabetes inventory in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Ann Behav Med. 2022;56(6):632–644. doi:10.1093/abm/kaab088.
doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab088
Ausili D, Barbaranelli C, Riegel B. Generalizability of the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory across cultures and languages: Italy and the United States. Eval Health Prof. 2020;43(1):41–49. doi:10.1177/0163278719840689.
doi: 10.1177/0163278719840689
Uchmanowicz I, Krzemińska S, Ausili D, Luciani M, Lisiak M. Polish adaptation of the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory (SCODI). Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:1341–1350. doi:10.2147/ppa.S253444.
doi: 10.2147/ppa.S253444
Kong S-Y, Cho M-K. Validity and reliability of the Korean Version of the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory (SCODI-K). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):12179. doi:10.3390/ijerph182212179.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212179
Ebadi A, Ausili D, Albatineh AN, Salarvand S, Ghanei Ghashlagh R. Psychometric evaluation of the Farsi version of the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory in Iranian patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:2775–2784. doi:10.2147/dmso.S235436.
doi: 10.2147/dmso.S235436
Matarese M, Clari M, De Marinis MG, et al. The Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory: development and psychometric evaluation. Eval Health Prof. 2020;43(1):50–62. doi:10.1177/0163278719856660.
doi: 10.1177/0163278719856660
Wang X, Zhang L, Liu Y, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory based on the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Int J Nurs Pract. 2024;30(2):e13230. doi:10.1111/ijn.13230.
doi: 10.1111/ijn.13230
Bugajski A, Szalacha L, Rechenberg K, Johnson A, Beckie T, Morgan H. Psychometric evaluation of the Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory in the United States. Heart Lung. 2022;51:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.07.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.07.004
Riegel B, Barbaranelli C, Sethares KA, et al. Development and initial testing of the self-care of chronic illness inventory. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(10):2465–2476. doi:10.1111/jan.13775.
doi: 10.1111/jan.13775
De Maria M, Matarese M, Strömberg A, et al. Cross-cultural assessment of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory: a psychometric evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;116:103422. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103422.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103422
Jin Y, Brown R, Bhattarai M, Kuo WC, Chen Y. Psychometric properties of the self-care of chronic illness inventory in Chinese older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Int J Older People Nurs. 2023;18(3):e12536. doi:10.1111/opn.12536.
doi: 10.1111/opn.12536
Arapi A, Vellone E, Ivziku D, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory in older adults living in a middle-income country. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6):4714. doi:10.3390/ijerph20064714.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064714
Luciani M, De Maria M, Page SD, Barbaranelli C, Ausili D, Riegel B. Measuring self-care in the general adult population: development and psychometric testing of the self-care inventory. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):598. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-12913-7.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12913-7
Yu DS, De Maria M, Barbaranelli C, et al. Cross-cultural applicability of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale in a multi-national study. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(2):681–692. doi:10.1111/jan.14617.
doi: 10.1111/jan.14617
Rababah JA, Al-Hammouri MM, Luciani M. Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Arabic self-care inventory. PLoS One. 2023;18(9):e0291904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291904.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291904
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.
doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
Massouh A, Skouri H, Cook P, Huijer HAS, Khoury M, Meek P. Self-care confidence mediates self-care maintenance and management in patients with heart failure. Heart Lung. 2020;49(1):30–35. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.07.008.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.07.008
Vellone E, Riegel B, Alvaro R. A situation-specific theory of caregiver contributions to heart failure self-care. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019;34(2):166–173. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000549.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000549
Vellone E, Riegel B, Cocchieri A, et al. Validity and reliability of the caregiver contribution to self-care of heart failure index. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;28(3):245–255. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e318256385e.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318256385e
Vellone E, Lorini S, Ausili D, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the caregiver contribution to self-care of chronic illness inventory. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(9):2434–2445. doi:10.1111/jan.14448.
doi: 10.1111/jan.14448
Matarese M, Pendoni R, Ausili D, Vellone E, De Maria M. Validity and reliability of caregiver contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory and caregiver self-efficacy in contributing to Self-Care Scale. Eval Health Prof. 2023;46(3):255–269. doi:10.1177/01632787221134712.
doi: 10.1177/01632787221134712
Iovino P, Lyons KS, De Maria M, et al. Patient and caregiver contributions to self-care in multiple chronic conditions: a multilevel modelling analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;116:103574. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103574.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103574
Vellone E, Chung ML, Alvaro R, Paturzo M, Dellafiore F. The influence of mutuality on self-care in heart failure patients and caregivers: a dyadic analysis. J Fam Nurs. 2018;24(4):563–584.
Dellafiore F, Chung ML, Alvaro R, et al. The association between mutuality, anxiety, and depression in heart failure patient-caregiver dyads: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019;34(6):465–473. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000599.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000599
Matarese M, Lyons KS, Piredda M, De Marinis MG. Disease-related knowledge in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their informal caregivers: a multilevel modelling analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2023;32(13–14):3543–3556. doi:10.1111/jocn.16433.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16433
Iovino P, De Maria M, Corvese F, et al. The influence of patient and caregiver depression on patient self-care and caregiver contribution to self-care in ostomy: a dyadic analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2023;32(17–18):6441–6449. doi:10.1111/jocn.16676.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16676
LoMartire R, Äng BO, Gerdle B, Vixner L. Psychometric properties of Short Form-36 Health Survey, EuroQol 5-dimensions, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic pain. Pain. 2020;161(1):83–95. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001700.
doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001700
Suwanno J, Phonphet C, Mayurapak C, Ninla-Aesong P, Thaimwong L. Exploring factors associated with hypertension self-care in primary care: The role of nurse education levels and patient-related factors. Int J Nurs Pract. 2023;e13208. doi:10.1111/ijn.13208.
doi: 10.1111/ijn.13208
Caruso R, Rebora P, Dellafiore F, et al. Clinical and socio-demographic determinants of inadequate self-care in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: the leading role of self-care confidence. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(2):151–161. doi:10.1007/s00592-018-1259-z.
doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1259-z
Iovino P, De Maria M, Matarese M, Vellone E, Ausili D, Riegel B. Depression and self-care in older adults with multiple chronic conditions: a multivariate analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(7):1668–1678. doi:10.1111/jan.14385.
doi: 10.1111/jan.14385
Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2004;4(5):581–585. doi:10.1586/14737167.4.5.581.
doi: 10.1586/14737167.4.5.581
Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5):582–592. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.
doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C
Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. 1993;58(4):525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825.
doi: 10.1007/BF02294825
Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1:185–216.
Finney S, Di Stefano C. Non normal and categorical data in structural equation models. In: Hancock G, Mueller R, eds. A Second Course in Structural Equation Modeling. Information Age; 2013:439–492.
Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 5th ed. Guilford Press; 2023.
Jak S, Jorgensen TD, Verdam MGE, Oort FJ, Elffers L. Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: a tutorial and shiny app. Behav Res Methods. 2021;53(4):1385–1406. doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0
Raykov T. Scale construction and development using structural equation modeling. In: Hoyle RH, ed. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2012:472–492.
Bentler PM. Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika. 2009;74(1):137–143. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1
Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. Introduction to Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011.
Barbaranelli C, Lee CS, Vellone E, Riegel B. Dimensionality and reliability of the self-care of heart failure index scales: further evidence from confirmatory factor analysis. Res Nurs Health. 2014;37(6):524–537. doi:10.1002/nur.21623.
doi: 10.1002/nur.21623
Barbaranelli C, Lee CS, Vellone E, Riegel B. The problem with Cronbach's alpha: comment on Sijtsma and van der Ark (2015). Nurs Res. 2015;64(2):140–145. doi:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000079.
doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000079
Vellone E, Barbaranelli C, Lee CS, Riegel B. Measures of self-care in heart failure: issues with factorial structure and reliability. Heart Lung. 2015;44(1):82–83. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.08.008.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.08.008