Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidney.

PCNL endourology horseshoe kidney percutaneous nephrolithotomy renal stone supine urolithiasis

Journal

Central European journal of urology
ISSN: 2080-4806
Titre abrégé: Cent European J Urol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101587101

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 07 01 2024
revised: 07 01 2024
accepted: 07 01 2024
medline: 30 9 2024
pubmed: 30 9 2024
entrez: 30 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Historically, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in horseshoe kidney (HSK) patients has been performed in the prone position. Nevertheless, thanks to the spread of the supine PCNL technique for patients with urinary stones and normal renal anatomy, some retrospective studies have already reported on supine PCNL and HSK, showing the effectiveness and safety of the procedure. Herein we report our experience with supine PCNL in a subset of patients with urolithiasis. Prospective data were collected for all HSK patients who underwent supine PCNL at our institution from June 2016 to June 2023. Stone volume was reported as the volume of a single stone or the sum of the volumes of multiple stones on computed tomography (CT) images. Patients were reported to be stone-free if there were no stones on postoperative non-contrast CT (NCCT) exam. Peri-/postoperative complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The primary endpoint of the study was stone-free rate (SFR) and the secondary endpoints were Clavien-Dindo complications Grade I or higher. A total of 35 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Forty-eight procedures were analyzed. SFR was 72.9% at 1-month follow-up. In 11 out of 48 procedures (22.9%) Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II complications were recorded. In one case Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa complication was observed. In this prospective study of 35 HSK patients who underwent 48 procedures, supine PCNL was safe and effective, with minimal morbidity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39345315
doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.8
pii: 008
pmc: PMC11428371
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

291-297

Informations de copyright

Copyright by Polish Urological Association.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Silvia Proietti (S)

Department of Urology, European Training Centre of Endourology (ETCE), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Salvatore Di Pietro (S)

Department of Urology, European Training Centre of Endourology (ETCE), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Mon Mon Oo (MM)

Department of Urology, European Training Centre of Endourology (ETCE), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Stefano Gisone (S)

Department of Urology, European Training Centre of Endourology (ETCE), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Riccardo Scalia (R)

Department of Urology, European Training Centre of Endourology (ETCE), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Franco Gaboardi (F)

Department of Urology, European Training Centre of Endourology (ETCE), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Guido Giusti (G)

Department of Urology, European Training Centre of Endourology (ETCE), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH