Attachment Wear in Different Clear Aligner Therapy: A Comparative Study.

Attachment wear clear aligner therapy comparative research orthodontic treatment treatment effectiveness

Journal

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
ISSN: 0976-4879
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101537209

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 07 04 2024
revised: 13 04 2024
accepted: 20 04 2024
medline: 30 9 2024
pubmed: 30 9 2024
entrez: 30 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Because of its ease and visual attractiveness, clear aligner therapy has grown in popularity as an orthodontic treatment option. On the other hand, the results of therapy may be impacted by attachment wear. Comparing attachment wear in three distinct clear aligner systems-System A, System B, and System C-was the goal of this investigation. The research comprised 60 individuals receiving clear aligners as part of their orthodontic treatment. Depending on whatever clear aligner system was being utilised, the patients were split into three groups. Attachment wear was evaluated using a standardised scoring method regularly. The various systems' attachment wear was compared using statistical analysis. Compared to Systems B and C, System A showed less attachment wear. There were notable variations in attachment wear ratings between the systems. System C's attachments had the most wear, whereas System A's attachments had the least. Different clear aligner systems showed varying degrees of attachment wear, with System A exhibiting the least amount of wear. To maximise treatment procedures and guarantee treatment efficacy and longevity in clear aligner therapy, it is vital to comprehend attachment wear patterns.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Because of its ease and visual attractiveness, clear aligner therapy has grown in popularity as an orthodontic treatment option. On the other hand, the results of therapy may be impacted by attachment wear. Comparing attachment wear in three distinct clear aligner systems-System A, System B, and System C-was the goal of this investigation.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The research comprised 60 individuals receiving clear aligners as part of their orthodontic treatment. Depending on whatever clear aligner system was being utilised, the patients were split into three groups. Attachment wear was evaluated using a standardised scoring method regularly. The various systems' attachment wear was compared using statistical analysis.
Results UNASSIGNED
Compared to Systems B and C, System A showed less attachment wear. There were notable variations in attachment wear ratings between the systems. System C's attachments had the most wear, whereas System A's attachments had the least.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Different clear aligner systems showed varying degrees of attachment wear, with System A exhibiting the least amount of wear. To maximise treatment procedures and guarantee treatment efficacy and longevity in clear aligner therapy, it is vital to comprehend attachment wear patterns.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39346471
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_398_24
pii: JPBS-16-2770
pmc: PMC11426661
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

S2770-S2772

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Kanuru Ravi Krishna (KR)

Department of Orthodontist, Drs. Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Dental School, Gannavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Kumar Adarsh (K)

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.

N Mothi Krishna (NM)

Department of Orthodontics, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Pandur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Orthodontics, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India.

Prince K Chacko (PK)

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Educare Institute of Dental Sciences, Chattiparambu, Malappuram, Kerala, India.

Praveen Kumar Varma Datla (PKV)

Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Rahul Tiwari (R)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Classifications MeSH