Six Myths and Misconceptions about Essential Tremor.
Essential tremor
classification
clinical
misconceptions
mortality
myths
Journal
Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 2160-8288
Titre abrégé: Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101569493
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
26
08
2024
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
30
9
2024
pubmed:
30
9
2024
entrez:
30
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There are myths and misperceptions about most human diseases, and neurological diseases are no exception. In many instances, myths and misconceptions reflect what is no more than the collective failure of the field to catch up with the state of the science in that field. Hence, one may perhaps refer to these as "lags" rather than myths. As the field of medicine attempts to be evidence-based, it is best to remain true to published data and the state of the science. In this paper, I review six myths and misconceptions about ET. Myth 1 relates to the natural history and prognosis of ET. Myths 2 and 3 relate to the biological basis of ET, whereas myths 4 and 5 relate to the expression of the core clinical feature of ET. Finally, myth 6 focuses on the issue of disease classification. The myths are as follows:
Identifiants
pubmed: 39346807
doi: 10.5334/tohm.948
pmc: PMC11428667
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
49Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author has no competing interests to declare.