Evolving capabilities of computed tomography imaging for transcatheter valvular heart interventions - new opportunities for precision medicine.

Agricola E, Ingallina G, Ancona F, Biondi F, Margonato D, Barki M et al (2023) Evolution of interventional imaging in structural heart disease. Eur Heart J Suppl 25(Suppl C):C189–C199

pmcid: 10132629 doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad044

Pontone G, Rossi A, Guglielmo M, Dweck MR, Gaemperli O, Nieman K et al (2022) Clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography: a consensus paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part I. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 23(3):299–314

pmcid: 8863074 doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab293

Achenbach S, Schuhbäck A, Min JK, Leipsic J (2013) Determination of the aortic annulus plane in CT imaging-a step-by-step approach. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(2):275–278

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.06.015

Nguyen V, Willner N, Eltchaninoff H, Burwash IG, Michel M, Durand E et al (2022) Trends in aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a French nationwide study. Eur Heart J 43(7):666–679

doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab773

Curio J, Beneduce A, Giannini F (2023) Transcatheter mitral and tricuspid interventions—the bigger picture: valvular disease as part of heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med 10:1091309

pmcid: 10225583 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1091309

Agricola E, Ancona F, Brochet E, Donal E, Dweck M, Faletra F et al (2021) The structural heart disease interventional imager rationale, skills and training: a position paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging 22(5):471–479

doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab005

Revels JW, Wang SS, Gharai LR, Febbo J, Fadl S, Bastawrous S (2021) The role of CT in planning percutaneous structural heart interventions: where to measure and why. Clin Imaging 76:247–264

doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.04.029

Nicol ED, Norgaard BL, Blanke P, Ahmadi A, Weir-McCall J, Horvat PM et al (2019) The future of Cardiovascular computed tomography: Advanced Analytics and clinical insights. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12(6):1058–1072

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.037

Rydberg J, Sandrasegaran K, Tarver RD, Frank MS, Conces DJ, Choplin RH (2007) Routine isotropic computed tomography scanning of chest: value of coronal and sagittal reformations. Invest Radiol 42(1):23–28

doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000248972.06586.9b

Wang DD, Qian Z, Vukicevic M, Engelhardt S, Kheradvar A, Zhang C et al (2021) 3D Printing, computational modeling, and Artificial Intelligence for Structural Heart Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 14(1):41–60

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.12.022

Wang Q, Primiano C, McKay R, Kodali S, Sun W (2014) CT image-based engineering analysis of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(5):526–528

pmcid: 4034127 doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.03.006

McQueen D, Peskin C (2000) A three-dimensional computer model of the human heart for studying cardiac fluid dynamics. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Graphics 34:56–60

doi: 10.1145/563788.604453

Thiriveedhi VK, Krishnaswamy D, Clunie D, Pieper S, Kikinis R, Fedorov A (2024) Cloud-based large-scale curation of medical imaging data using AI segmentation. Res Sq.;rs.3.rs-4351526

Yucel-Finn A, Nicol E, Leipsic JA, Weir-McCall JR (2021) CT in planning transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures and risk assessment. Clin Radiol 76(1):73. http://e1-73.e19

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.11.015

Reid A, Blanke P, Bax JJ, Leipsic J (2021) Multimodality imaging in valvular heart disease: how to use state-of-the-art technology in daily practice. Eur Heart J 42(19):1912–1925

doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa768

Pulerwitz TC, Khalique OK, Leb J, Hahn RT, Nazif TM, Leon MB et al (2020) Optimizing Cardiac CT protocols for Comprehensive Acquisition Prior to Percutaneous MV and TV Repair/Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13(3):836–850

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.041

Hell MM, Emrich T, Lurz P, von Bardeleben RS, Schmermund A (2023) Cardiac CT beyond coronaries: Focus on Structural Heart Disease. Curr Heart Fail Rep 20(6):484–492

pmcid: 10746749 doi: 10.1007/s11897-023-00635-9

Faletti R, Gatti M, Cosentino A, Bergamasco L, Cura Stura E, Garabello D et al (2018) 3D printing of the aortic annulus based on cardiovascular computed tomography: preliminary experience in pre-procedural planning for aortic valve sizing. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12(5):391–397

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.05.016

Ripley B, Kelil T, Cheezum MK, Goncalves A, Di Carli MF, Rybicki FJ et al (2016) 3D printing based on cardiac CT assists anatomic visualization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(1):28–36

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.12.004

Wang Q, Sun W (2013) Finite element modeling of mitral valve dynamic deformation using patient-specific multi-slices computed tomography scans. Ann Biomed Eng 41(1):142–153

doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0620-6

Tuncay V, van Ooijen PMA (2019) 3D printing for heart valve disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol Exp 3(1):9

pmcid: 6377684 doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0083-0

Liang L, Kong F, Martin C, Pham T, Wang Q, Duncan J et al (2017) Machine learning-based 3-D geometry reconstruction and modeling of aortic valve deformation using 3-D computed tomography images. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng.;33(5)

Quarteroni A, Dede’ L, Manzoni A, Vergara C (2019) Mathematical Modelling of the Human Cardiovascular System: Data, Numerical Approximation, Clinical Applications [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; [cited 2024 May 20]. (Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics). https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/mathematical-modelling-of-the-human-cardiovascular-system/FDFB267D1042D5E98C30A169E444D123

de Vecchi A, Gomez A, Pushparajah K, Schaeffter T, Nordsletten DA, Simpson JM et al (2014) Towards a fast and efficient approach for modelling the patient-specific ventricular haemodynamics. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 116(1):3–10

doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.08.010

de Vecchi A, Gomez A, Pushparajah K, Schaeffter T, Simpson JM, Razavi R et al (2016) A novel methodology for personalized simulations of ventricular hemodynamics from noninvasive imaging data. Comput Med Imaging Graph 51:20–31

pmcid: 4907311 doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2016.03.004

Plitman Mayo R, Yaakobovich H, Finkelstein A, Shadden SC, Marom G (2020) Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation. R Soc Open Sci 7(12):201838

pmcid: 7813235 doi: 10.1098/rsos.201838

Qureshi A, Lip GYH, Nordsletten DA, Williams SE, Aslanidi O, de Vecchi A (2023) Imaging and biophysical modelling of thrombogenic mechanisms in atrial fibrillation and stroke. Front Cardiovasc Med 9:1074562

pmcid: 9887999 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1074562

Karády J, Ntalas I, Prendergast B, Blauth C, Niederer S, Maurovich-Horvat P et al (2018) Transcatheter mitral valve replacement in mitral annulus calcification - ‘The art of computer simulation’. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12(2):153–157

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.12.007

Oks D, Reza S, Vázquez M, Houzeaux G, Kovarovic B, Samaniego C et al (2024) Effect of Sinotubular Junction size on TAVR Leaflet thrombosis: a fluid-structure Interaction Analysis. Ann Biomed Eng 52(3):719–733

doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03419-3

Luraghi G, Migliavacca F, García-González A, Chiastra C, Rossi A, Cao D et al (2019) On the modeling of patient-specific transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a fluid-structure Interaction Approach. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 10(3):437–455

doi: 10.1007/s13239-019-00427-0

Coorey G, Figtree GA, Fletcher DF, Snelson VJ, Vernon ST, Winlaw D et al (2022) The health digital twin to tackle cardiovascular disease—a review of an emerging interdisciplinary field. Npj Digit Med 5(1):1–12

doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00640-7

Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, Rodero C, Loncaric F, Feng Y et al (2020) The ‘Digital twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology. Eur Heart J 41(48):4556–4564

pmcid: 7774470 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa159

Liu X, Fan J, Mortier P, He Y, Zhu Q, Guo Y et al (2021) Sealing Behavior in Transcatheter Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves Replacement Through Patient-Specific Computational Modeling. Front Cardiovasc Med [Internet]. Oct 11 [cited 2024 May 18];8. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/ https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.732784

de Jaegere P, De Santis G, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, Bruining N, Dezutter T et al (2016) Patient-specific computer modeling to Predict Aortic Regurgitation after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(5):508–512

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.003

El Faquir N, De Backer O, Bosmans J, Rudolph T, Buzzatti N, Bieliauskas G et al (2020) Patient-Specific Computer Simulation in TAVR With the Self-Expanding Evolut R Valve. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.;13(15):1803–12

Hokken TW, Wienemann H, Dargan J, van Ginkel DJ, Dowling C, Unbehaun A et al (2023) Clinical value of CT-derived simulations of transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation in challenging anatomies the PRECISE-TAVI trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 102(6):1140–1148

doi: 10.1002/ccd.30816

Dowling C, Gooley R, McCormick L, Rashid HN, Dargan J, Khan F et al Patient-Specific Computer Simulation to Predict Conduction Disturbance With Current-Generation Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valves. Structural Heart [Internet]. 2022 Jul 1 [cited 2024 May 24];6(3). https://www.structuralheartjournal.org/article/S2474-8706(22)01260-X/fulltext

Chen F, Jia K, Li Y, Xiong T, Wang X, Zhu Z et al (2022) Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis. EuroIntervention 18(3):203–212

pmcid: 9912966 doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00970

Yudi MB, Sharma SK, Tang GHL, Kini A (2018) Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 71(12):1360–1378

doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.057

Allali A, El-Mawardy M, Schwarz B, Sato T, Geist V, Toelg R et al (2016) Incidence, feasibility and outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding prosthesis. Results from a single center experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 17(6):391–398

doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.05.010

Tanaka A, Jabbour RJ, Testa L, Agnifili M, Ettori F, Fiorina C et al (2019) Incidence, Technical Safety, and feasibility of coronary angiography and intervention following self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 20(5):371–375

doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.026

Dargan J, Rocatello G, Weng Y, Khan F, Firoozi S, Dowling C et al (2023) Patient-specific computer modelling to predict anatomical risk factors preventing post transcatheter aortic valve implantation coronary re-access in bicuspid aortic valve; a modelling study. Eur Heart J 44(Supplement2):ehad6551670

doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.1670

Pasta S, Cannata S, Gentile G, Di Giuseppe M, Cosentino F, Pasta F et al (2020) Simulation study of transcatheter heart valve implantation in patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Med Biol Eng Comput 58(4):815–829

doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02138-4

Hatoum H, Singh-Gryzbon S, Esmailie F, Ruile P, Neumann FJ, Blanke P et al (2021) Predictive model for Thrombus formation after transcatheter valve replacement. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 12(6):576–588

pmcid: 11034843 doi: 10.1007/s13239-021-00596-x

Heitkemper M, Hatoum H, Azimian A, Yeats B, Dollery J, Whitson B et al (2020) Modeling risk of coronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 159(3):829–838e3

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.091

Hossien A, Nithiarasu P, Cheriex E, Maessen J, Sardari Nia P, Ashraf S (2015) A multidimensional dynamic quantification tool for the mitral valve. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 21(4):481–487

doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv187

Ring L, Rana BS, Kydd A, Boyd J, Parker K, Rusk RA (2012) Dynamics of the tricuspid valve annulus in normal and dilated right hearts: a three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography study. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging 13(9):756–762

doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes040

Yoon SH, Bleiziffer S, Latib A, Eschenbach L, Ancona M, Vincent F et al (2019) Predictors of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12(2):182–193

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.001

De Vecchi A, Marlevi D, Nordsletten DA, Ntalas I, Leipsic J, Bapat V et al (2018) Left ventricular outflow obstruction predicts increase in systolic pressure gradients and blood residence time after transcatheter mitral valve replacement. Sci Rep 8(1):15540

pmcid: 6195528 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33836-7

Blanke P, Naoum C, Dvir D, Bapat V, Ong K, Muller D et al (2017) Predicting LVOT obstruction in transcatheter mitral valve implantation: Concept of the Neo-LVOT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(4):482–485

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.005

Hashimoto G, Lopes BBC, Sato H, Fukui M, Garcia S, Gössl M et al (2022) Computed Tomography Planning for Transcatheter mitral valve replacement. Struct Heart 6(1):100012

pmcid: 10236884 doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100012

Meduri CU, Reardon MJ, Lim DS, Howard E, Dunnington G, Lee DP et al (2019) Novel Multiphase Assessment for Predicting Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction before transcatheter mitral valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12(23):2402–2412

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.015

Hill SJ, Young A, Prendergast B, Redwood S, Rajani R, De Vecchi A (2022) Patient-specific fluid simulation of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in mitral annulus calcification. Front Cardiovasc Med 9:934305

pmcid: 9797989 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.934305

Chehab O, Roberts-Thomson R, Bivona A, Gill H, Patterson T, Pursnani A et al (2022) Management of patients with severe mitral annular calcification: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 80(7):722–738

doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.009

de Vecchi A, Niederer S, Karády J, Ntalas I, Maurovich-Horvat P, Rajani R (2018) Computational fluid dynamic modelling to determine the hemodynamic effects of implanting a transcatheter mitral valve within the left ventricle. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34(5):803–805

Pasta S, Catalano C, Cannata S, Guccione JM, Gandolfo C (2022) Numerical simulation of transcatheter mitral valve replacement: the dynamic implication of LVOT obstruction in the valve-in-ring case. J Biomech 144:111337

doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111337

Taramasso M, Pozzoli A, Basso C, Thiene G, Denti P, Kuwata S et al (2018) Compare and contrast tricuspid and mitral valve anatomy: interventional perspectives for transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies. EuroIntervention 13(16):1889–1898

doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00704

Goldberg YH, Ho E, Chau M, Latib A (2021) Update on transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement therapies. Front Cardiovasc Med 8:619558

pmcid: 7917079 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.619558

Buğan B, İjlal Çekirdekçi E, Çağatay Onar L, Barçın C (2022) Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement for Tricuspid Regurgitation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Anatol J Cardiol 26(7):505–519

pmcid: 9318347 doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1440

Praz F, Khalique OK, Dos Reis Macedo LG, Pulerwitz TC, Jantz J, Wu IY et al (2018) Comparison between three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Computed Tomography for Comprehensive Tricuspid Annulus and Valve Assessment in severe tricuspid regurgitation: implications for Tricuspid Regurgitation Grading and Transcatheter therapies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31(11):1190–1202e3

doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.07.007

Katkar RA, Taft RM, Grant GT (2018) 3D volume rendering and 3D Printing (Additive Manufacturing). Dental Clin N Am 62(3):393–402

doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.003

Kim MS, Hansgen AR, Wink O, Quaife RA, Carroll JD (2008) Rapid prototyping: a new tool in understanding and treating structural heart disease. Circulation 117(18):2388–2394

doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740977

Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D Printing: current and projected uses. P T 39(10):704–711

pmcid: 4189697

Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU et al (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(4):335–341

doi: 10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x

Bücking TM, Hill ER, Robertson JL, Maneas E, Plumb AA, Nikitichev DI (2017) From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models. PLoS ONE 12(5):e0178540

pmcid: 5451060 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178540

Giannopoulos AA, Mitsouras D, Yoo SJ, Liu PP, Chatzizisis YS, Rybicki FJ (2016) Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular diseases. Nat Rev Cardiol 13(12):701–718

doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.170

Wang DD, Eng M, Kupsky D, Myers E, Forbes M, Rahman M et al (2016) Application of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Image Guidance to WATCHMAN Implantation and Impact on Early Operator Learning curve: single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(22):2329–2340

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.038

Vukicevic M, Faza NN, Little SH (2021) Patient-specific preprocedural planning for tricuspid valve repair and replacement procedures. Curr Opin Cardiol 36(5):495–504

doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000900

Huang H, Tayyab H, Khan A, Shah U, Anantharaj RM, Rajak K et al (2023) Three-dimensional Printing and modeling in Interventional Cardiology: a Comprehensive Review. Annals Clin Cardiol 5(2):53

doi: 10.4103/ACCJ.ACCJ_20_23

Fan Y, Kwok KW, Zhang Y, Cheung GSH, Chan AKY, Lee APW (2016) Three-Dimensional Printing for planning occlusion Procedure for a double-lobed left atrial appendage. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 9(3):e003561

doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003561

Harb SC, Rodriguez LL, Svensson LG, Xu B, Elgharably H, Klatte R et al (2018) Pitfalls and pearls for 3-Dimensional Printing of the tricuspid valve in the Procedural Planning of Percutaneous Transcatheter therapies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11(10):1531–1534

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.05.003

Cabasa AS, Eleid MF, Rihal CS, Villarraga HR, Foley TA, Suri RM (2015) Tricuspid valve replacement: a Percutaneous Transfemoral Valve-in-Ring Approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8(8):1126–1128

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.025

Hernández-Enríquez M, Brugaletta S, Andreu D, Macià-Muñoz G, Castrejón-Subirá M, Fernández-Suelves S et al (2017) Three-dimensional printing of an aortic model for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: possible clinical applications. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(2):283–285

doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0983-0

Qian Z, Wang K, Liu S, Zhou X, Rajagopal V, Meduri C et al (2017) Quantitative prediction of Paravalvular Leak in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on tissue-mimicking 3D Printing. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(7):719–731

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.005

Hatoum H, Dollery J, Lilly SM, Crestanello J, Dasi LP (2019) Impact of patient-specific morphologies on sinus flow stasis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an in vitro study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 157(2):540–549

doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.086

Hatoum H, Lilly SM, Crestanello J, Dasi LP (2019) A case study on implantation strategies to mitigate coronary obstruction in a patient receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Biomech 89:115–118

pmcid: 11067729 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.010

Wang DD, Eng MH, Greenbaum AB, Myers E, Forbes M, Karabon P et al (2018) Validating a prediction modeling tool for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 92(2):379–387

doi: 10.1002/ccd.27447

Vukicevic M, Mosadegh B, Min JK, Little SH (2017) Cardiac 3D Printing and its future directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(2):171–184

pmcid: 5664227 doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.001

Faza NN, Harb SC, Wang DD, van den DMMP, Van MN, Little SH (2024) Physical and computational modeling for Transcatheter Structural Heart interventions. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 17(4):428–440

Wang K, Zhao Y, Chang YH, Qian Z, Zhang C, Wang B et al (2016) Controlling the mechanical behavior of dual-material 3D printed meta-materials for patient-specific tissue-mimicking phantoms. Mater Design 90:704–712

doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.022

Minga I, Al-Ani MA, Moharem-Elgamal S, Md AVH, Md ASA, Masoomi M et al (2024) Use of virtual reality and 3D models in contemporary practice of Cardiology. Curr Cardiol Rep 26(6):643–650

Mahtab EAF, Egorova AD (2022) Current and future applications of virtual reality technology for cardiac interventions. Nat Rev Cardiol 19(12):779–780

pmcid: 9531630 doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00789-4

Stephenson N, Pushparajah K, Wheeler G, Deng S, Schnabel JA, Simpson JM (2023) Extended reality for procedural planning and guidance in structural heart disease – a review of the state-of-the-art. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 39(7):1405–1419

pmcid: 10250452 doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02823-z

Ruyra X, Permanyer E, Huguet M, Maldonado G (2022) Use of virtual reality for procedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 35(5):ivac248

pmcid: 9639804 doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac248

Chahine J, Mascarenhas L, Yannopoulos D, Raveendran G, Gurevich S (2024) Virtual reality to predict paravalvular leak in bicuspid severe aortic valve stenosis in transcatheter aortic valve implants. J Invasive Cardiol 36(7). https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00019 . Epub March 11, 2024

Khokhar AA, Zlahoda-Huzior A, Stanuch M, Ponticelli F, Ruggiero R, Chandra K et al (2022) Advanced CT-Based imaging techniques to evaluate Coronary Access after TAVI for degenerated Surgical Bioprosthesis. Can J Cardiol 38(3):392–394

doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.11.005

Jang SJ, Liu J, Singh G, Al’Aref SJ, Caprio A, Amiri Moghadam AA et al (2019) Abstract 11714: augmented reality Guidance for Transcatheter Septal puncture Procedure in Structural Heart interventions. Circulation 140(Suppl1):A11714–A11714

Sadeghi AH, Ooms JF, Bakhuis W, Taverne YJHJ, Van Mieghem NM, Bogers AJJC (2021) Immersive virtual reality heart models for planning of Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: a feasibility study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 14(16):1854–1856

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.018

Hussain MA, Nabi F (2017) Complex structural interventions: the role of computed tomography, Fluoroscopy, and Fusion Imaging. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 13(3):98–105

pmcid: 5935210 doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-3-98

Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Stöcker B, Geist V, Richardt D, Tölg R et al (2010) Anatomic and procedural predictors of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(20):1623–1629

doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.035

Silva JNA, Southworth M, Raptis C, Silva J (2018) Emerging applications of virtual reality in Cardiovascular Medicine. JACC Basic Transl Sci 3(3):420–430

pmcid: 6058998 doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.11.009

Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN et al (2023) Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ 23(1):689

pmcid: 10517477 doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z

LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444

doi: 10.1038/nature14539

Bernard O, Lalande A, Zotti C, Cervenansky F, Yang X, Heng PA et al (2018) Deep Learning techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac multi-structures Segmentation and diagnosis: is the Problem Solved? IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37(11):2514–2525

doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2837502

Tatsugami F, Nakaura T, Yanagawa M, Fujita S, Kamagata K, Ito R et al (2023) Recent advances in artificial intelligence for cardiac CT: enhancing diagnosis and prognosis prediction. Diagn Interv Imaging 104(11):521–528

doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.06.011

Blanke P, Weir-McCall JR, Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Jilaihawi H et al (2019) Computed Tomography Imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): an Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular computed Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12(1):1–24

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.003

Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Pflederer T, Marwan M, Schmid J, Nef H et al (2014) Reproducibility of aortic annulus measurements by computed tomography. Eur Radiol 24(8):1878–1888

doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3199-5

Francone M, Budde RPJ, Bremerich J, Dacher JN, Loewe C, Wolf F et al (2020) CT and MR imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: standardisation of scanning protocols, measurements and reporting-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). Eur Radiol 30(5):2627–2650

doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06357-8

Hewitson LJ, Cadiz S, Al-Sayed S, Fellows S, Amin A, Asimakopoulos G et al (2023) Time to TAVI: streamlining the pathway to treatment. Open Heart 10(2):e002170

pmcid: 10481834 doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002170

Sorajja Paul W, Brian H, Nadira N, Hursh M, Raj T, Peter et al (2023) Transcatheter repair for patients with tricuspid regurgitation. N Engl J Med 388(20):1833–1842

doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300525

Winkel MG, Praz F, Wenaweser P (2020) Mitral and tricuspid transcatheter interventions current indications and future directions. Front Cardiovasc Med 7:61

pmcid: 7242641 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00061

Lou J, Obuchowski NA, Krishnaswamy A, Popovic Z, Flamm SD, Kapadia SR et al (2015) Manual, semiautomated, and fully automated measurement of the aortic annulus for planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR/TAVI): analysis of interchangeability. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9(1):42–49

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.11.003

Santaló-Corcoy M, Corbin D, Tastet O, Lesage F, Modine T, Asgar A et al (2023) TAVI-PREP: a deep learning-based Tool for Automated measurements extraction in TAVI Planning. Diagnostics (Basel) 13(20):3181

doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203181

Wang M, Niu G, Chen Y, Zhou Z, Feng D, Zhang Y et al (2023) Development and validation of a deep learning-based fully automated algorithm for pre-TAVR CT assessment of the aortic valvular complex and detection of anatomical risk factors: a retrospective, multicentre study. EBioMedicine 96:104794

pmcid: 10507199 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104794

Toggweiler S, Wyler von Ballmoos MC, Moccetti F, Douverny A, Wolfrum M, Imamoglu Z et al (2024) A fully automated artificial intelligence-driven software for planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 65:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.03.008 . Epub March 7, 2024

Bartkowiak J, Vivekanantham H, Kassar M, Dernektsi C, Agarwal V, Lebehn M et al (2024) Computed tomography anatomic predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 18(3):259–266

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.02.001

Kirchner J, Gesch J, Gercek M, Piran M, Friedrichs K, Pfister R et al (2024) Analysis of tricuspid annulus dimensions and RCA-proximity with artificial intelligence-based software for procedural planning of percutaneous tricuspid annuloplasty. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 18(3):309–310

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.01.005

Schimmel K, Ichimura K, Reddy S, Haddad F, Spiekerkoetter E (2022) Cardiac Fibrosis in the pressure overloaded Left and right ventricle as a therapeutic target. Front Cardiovasc Med 9:886553

pmcid: 9120363 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.886553

López B, Ravassa S, Moreno MU, José GS, Beaumont J, González A et al (2021) Diffuse myocardial fibrosis: mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol 18(7):479–498

doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00504-1

McLenachan JM, Dargie HJ (1990) Ventricular arrhythmias in hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. Relationship to coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and myocardial fibrosis. Am J Hypertens 3(10):735–740

doi: 10.1093/ajh/3.10.735

Brower GL, Gardner JD, Forman MF, Murray DB, Voloshenyuk T, Levick SP et al (2006) The relationship between myocardial extracellular matrix remodeling and ventricular function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30(4):604–610

doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.07.006

Anderson KR, Sutton MG, Lie JT (1979) Histopathological types of cardiac fibrosis in myocardial disease. J Pathol 128(2):79–85

doi: 10.1002/path.1711280205

Duca F, Kammerlander AA, Zotter-Tufaro C, Aschauer S, Schwaiger ML, Marzluf BA et al (2016) Interstitial fibrosis, functional status, and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from a prospective Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9(12):e005277

doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005277

Briasoulis A, Mallikethi-Reddy S, Palla M, Alesh I, Afonso L (2015) Myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis. Heart 101(17):1406–1411

doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307682

Schelbert EB, Fridman Y, Wong TC, Abu Daya H, Piehler KM, Kadakkal A et al (2017) Temporal relation between myocardial fibrosis and heart failure with preserved Ejection Fraction: Association with Baseline Disease Severity and subsequent outcome. JAMA Cardiol 2(9):995–1006

pmcid: 5710176 doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2511

Haaf P, Garg P, Messroghli DR, Broadbent DA, Greenwood JP, Plein S (2016) Cardiac T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:89

pmcid: 5129251 doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0308-4

Nacif MS, Kawel N, Lee JJ, Chen X, Yao J, Zavodni A et al (2012) Interstitial myocardial fibrosis assessed as extracellular volume fraction with low-radiation-dose cardiac CT. Radiology 264(3):876–883

pmcid: 3426854 doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112458

Einstein AJ, Shaw LJ, Hirschfeld C, Williams MC, Villines TC, Better N et al (2021) International Impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis of Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 77(2):173–185

pmcid: 7836433 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.054

Cundari G, Galea N, Mergen V, Alkadhi H, Eberhard M (2023) Myocardial extracellular volume quantification with computed tomography—current status and future outlook. Insights into Imaging 14(1):156

pmcid: 10519917 doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01506-6

van Assen M, De Cecco CN, Sahbaee P, Eid MH, Griffith LP, Bauer MJ et al (2019) Feasibility of extracellular volume quantification using dual-energy CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 13(1):81–84

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.011

Abadia AF, Grant KL, Carey KE, Bolch WE, Morin RL (2017) Spatial distribution of Iron within the Normal Human Liver using dual-source dual-energy CT imaging. Invest Radiol 52(11):693–700

doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000393

Abadia AF, van Assen M, Martin SS, Vingiani V, Griffith LP, Giovagnoli DA et al (2020) Myocardial extracellular volume fraction to differentiate healthy from cardiomyopathic myocardium using dual-source dual-energy CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 14(2):162–167

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.09.008

Hong YJ, Kim TK, Hong D, Park CH, Yoo SJ, Wickum ME et al (2016) Myocardial characterization using dual-energy CT in Doxorubicin-Induced DCM: comparison with CMR T1-Mapping and histology in a rabbit model. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9(7):836–845

doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.018

Bandula S, White SK, Flett AS, Lawrence D, Pugliese F, Ashworth MT et al (2013) Measurement of myocardial extracellular volume fraction by using equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT: validation against histologic findings. Radiology 269(2):396–403

doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130130

Treibel TA, Bandula S, Fontana M, White SK, Gilbertson JA, Herrey AS et al (2015) Extracellular volume quantification by dynamic equilibrium cardiac computed tomography in cardiac amyloidosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9(6):585–592

pmcid: 4684159 doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.001

Hayashi H, Oda S, Emoto T, Kidoh M, Nagayama Y, Nakaura T et al (2022) Myocardial extracellular volume quantification by cardiac CT in pulmonary hypertension: comparison with cardiac MRI. Eur J Radiol 153:110386

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110386

Ohta Y, Kishimoto J, Kitao S, Yunaga H, Mukai-Yatagai N, Fujii S et al (2020) Investigation of myocardial extracellular volume fraction in heart failure patients using iodine map with rapid-kV switching dual-energy CT: segmental comparison with MRI T1 mapping. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 14(4):349–355

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.12.032

Suzuki M, Toba T, Izawa Y, Fujita H, Miwa K, Takahashi Y et al (2021) Prognostic impact of myocardial extracellular volume Fraction Assessment using dual-energy computed tomography in patients treated with aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Heart Association 10(18):e020655

doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020655

Hammer Y, Talmor-Barkan Y, Abelow A, Orvin K, Aviv Y, Bar N et al (2021) Myocardial extracellular volume quantification by computed tomography predicts outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis. PLoS ONE 16(3):e0248306

pmcid: 7946277 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248306

Han D, Tamarappoo B, Klein E, Tyler J, Chakravarty T, Otaki Y et al (2021) Computed tomography angiography-derived extracellular volume fraction predicts early recovery of left ventricular systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging 22(2):179–185

doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa310

Tamarappoo B, Han D, Tyler J, Chakravarty T, Otaki Y, Miller R et al (2020) Prognostic value of computed tomography-derived extracellular volume in TAVR patients with Low-Flow Low-Gradient aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13(12):2591–2601

pmcid: 7850162 doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.07.045

Kato S, Misumi Y, Horita N, Yamamoto K, Utsunomiya D (2024) Clinical utility of computed tomography–derived myocardial extracellular volume fraction: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 17(5):516–528

Evolving capabilities of computed tomography imaging for transcatheter valvular heart interventions - new opportunities for precision medicine.

Journal

Informations de publication

Résumé

Identifiants

Types de publication

Langues

Sous-ensembles de citation

Subventions

Informations de copyright

Références

Auteurs

Vitaliy Androshchuk (V)

Natalie Montarello (N)

Nishant Lahoti (N)

Samuel Joseph Hill (SJ)

Can Zhou (C)

Tiffany Patterson (T)

Simon Redwood (S)

Steven Niederer (S)

Pablo Lamata (P)

Adelaide De Vecchi (A)

Ronak Rajani (R)

Classifications MeSH