Do patients' preferences and expectations match clinical guidelines? A survey of individuals seeking private primary care for a musculoskeletal disorder.

Expectations Musculoskeletal pain Patient preference Survey

Journal

Musculoskeletal science & practice
ISSN: 2468-7812
Titre abrégé: Musculoskelet Sci Pract
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101692753

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 26 02 2024
revised: 03 09 2024
accepted: 25 09 2024
medline: 30 9 2024
pubmed: 30 9 2024
entrez: 30 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Physiotherapists often inconsistently adhere to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) when managing musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs), potentially due to discrepancies between patient-valued interventions and guideline recommendations. Since patients' expectations are important predictors of outcome, this disparity between CPGs recommendations and patient preferences could be problematic for the effective care of MSKDs. To assess patients' expectations and preferences for the interventions used in their MSKD management and to establish correspondence rates between patients' preferences and recommendations from CPGs. Survey. This cross-sectional descriptive study included a survey on sociodemographics, preferences, and expectations towards interventions for their MSKD, acceptable cost of care, number of treatment sessions required, and their involvement in their MSKD management. One hundred and fifty participants (94 women and 56 men; mean age: 51 ± 17) responded to the survey. Eighty percent of respondents expected their involvement in their MSKD management to be equal to or superior than that of the physiotherapist. Sixty-nine percent of respondents expected to receive exercises, and 67% expected to receive education. Based on preference ratings, 95% of respondents chose recommended interventions, 57% chose interventions with uncertain levels of recommendation, and 48% chose interventions not recommended by CPGs. Less than 70% of participants expected to receive education and exercises, the two most frequently recommended interventions by CPGs. On the other hand, the majority of respondents indicated that their involvement should be equal to or superior than that of the physiotherapist. This aligns with CPGs, which advocate for active and self-management strategies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Physiotherapists often inconsistently adhere to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) when managing musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs), potentially due to discrepancies between patient-valued interventions and guideline recommendations. Since patients' expectations are important predictors of outcome, this disparity between CPGs recommendations and patient preferences could be problematic for the effective care of MSKDs.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To assess patients' expectations and preferences for the interventions used in their MSKD management and to establish correspondence rates between patients' preferences and recommendations from CPGs.
DESIGN METHODS
Survey.
METHOD METHODS
This cross-sectional descriptive study included a survey on sociodemographics, preferences, and expectations towards interventions for their MSKD, acceptable cost of care, number of treatment sessions required, and their involvement in their MSKD management.
RESULTS RESULTS
One hundred and fifty participants (94 women and 56 men; mean age: 51 ± 17) responded to the survey. Eighty percent of respondents expected their involvement in their MSKD management to be equal to or superior than that of the physiotherapist. Sixty-nine percent of respondents expected to receive exercises, and 67% expected to receive education. Based on preference ratings, 95% of respondents chose recommended interventions, 57% chose interventions with uncertain levels of recommendation, and 48% chose interventions not recommended by CPGs.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Less than 70% of participants expected to receive education and exercises, the two most frequently recommended interventions by CPGs. On the other hand, the majority of respondents indicated that their involvement should be equal to or superior than that of the physiotherapist. This aligns with CPGs, which advocate for active and self-management strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39348727
pii: S2468-7812(24)00290-X
doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103195
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103195

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dclaration of compenting interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Marc-Olivier Dubé (MO)

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Center, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Pierre Langevin (P)

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Clinique Cortex and Physio Interactive, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Hugo Massé-Alarie (H)

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Jean-Francois Esculier (JF)

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; The Running Clinic, Lac Beauport, Quebec, Canada; MoveMed Physiotherapy, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Anthony Lachance (A)

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Jean-Sébastien Roy (JS)

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: jean-sebastien.roy@fmed.ulaval.ca.

Classifications MeSH