Dobutamine stress echocardiography after positive CCTA: diagnostic performance using fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio as reference standards.
Humans
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
/ physiology
Male
Female
Echocardiography, Stress
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Coronary Angiography
/ methods
Middle Aged
Aged
Coronary Artery Disease
/ physiopathology
Reproducibility of Results
Predictive Value of Tests
Computed Tomography Angiography
/ methods
Coronary Stenosis
/ physiopathology
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Dobutamine
/ administration & dosage
Reference Standards
Angina Pectoris
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Computed Tomography Angiography
Echocardiography
FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE
Journal
Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Sep 2024
30 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
16
08
2024
accepted:
25
08
2024
medline:
1
10
2024
pubmed:
1
10
2024
entrez:
30
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in symptomatic patients with a low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a positive coronary CT angiography (CCTA). We prospectively enrolled 104 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for symptoms of stable CAD and a CCTA indicative of obstructive CAD. The diagnostic performance of DSE was evaluated against two intracoronary pressure indices: (a) fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.80 and (b) instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.89, indicating haemodynamically significant stenoses. Of 102 patients, 46 (45%) had at least one significant lesion as defined by FFR, as did 37 (36%) as defined by iFR. DSE showed positive results in 33% (34/102) of cases. The discriminative power of DSE for detecting significant CAD was moderate, with areas under the curve of 0.63 (p=0.024) compared with FFR and 0.64 (p=0.025) compared with iFR. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of DSE were, respectively, 61%, 43%, and 75% against FFR, and 64%, 46% and 74% against iFR. The diagnostic accuracy of DSE did not differ significantly between FFR and iFR as a reference (p=0.549). In patients with positive CCTA, DSE has a moderate ability to identify haemodynamically significant CAD, with low sensitivity and moderate specificity. When assessed against FFR and iFR criteria, its additive diagnostic value is limited in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive CAD. NCT03045601.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39349050
pii: openhrt-2024-002899
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002899
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dobutamine
3S12J47372
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03045601']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.