The role and regulation of integrins in cell migration and invasion.

Humphries, J. D., Byron, A. & Humphries, M. J. Integrin ligands at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 119, 3901–3903 (2006).

pubmed: 16988024 doi: 10.1242/jcs.03098

Hynes, R. O. Integrins. Cell 110, 673–687 (2002).

pubmed: 12297042 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00971-6

Ivaska, J. & Heino, J. Cooperation between integrins and growth factor receptors in signaling and endocytosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 291–320 (2011).

pubmed: 21663443 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154017

Stanislovas, J. & Kermorgant, S. c-Met-integrin cooperation: mechanisms, tumorigenic effects, and therapeutic relevance. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 994528 (2022).

pubmed: 36330337 pmcid: 9624249 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.994528

Hamidi, H. & Ivaska, J. Every step of the way: integrins in cancer progression and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 533–548 (2018).

pubmed: 30002479 pmcid: 6629548 doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0038-z

Yamada, K. M. & Sixt, M. Mechanisms of 3D cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 738–752 (2019).

pubmed: 31582855 doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0172-9

SenGupta, S., Parent, C. A. & Bear, J. E. The principles of directed cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 529–547 (2021).

pubmed: 33990789 pmcid: 8663916 doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00366-6

Green, H. J. & Brown, N. H. Integrin intracellular machinery in action. Exp. Cell Res. 378, 226–231 (2019).

pubmed: 30853446 doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.03.011

Orré, T., Rossier, O. & Giannone, G. The inner life of integrin adhesion sites: from single molecules to functional macromolecular complexes. Exp. Cell Res. 379, 235–244 (2019).

pubmed: 30943383 doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.03.036

Saraswathibhatla, A., Indana, D. & Chaudhuri, O. Cell–extracellular matrix mechanotransduction in 3D HHS Public Access. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 495–516 (2023).

pubmed: 36849594 pmcid: 10656994 doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00583-1

Kanchanawong, P. & Calderwood, D. A. Organization, dynamics and mechanoregulation of integrin-mediated cell–ECM adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 142–161 (2023).

pubmed: 36168065 doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00531-5

Kechagia, J. Z., Ivaska, J. & Roca-Cusachs, P. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 457–473 (2019).

pubmed: 31182865 doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0134-2

Luo, B.-H., Carman, C. V. & Springer, T. A. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 619–647 (2007).

pubmed: 17201681 pmcid: 1952532 doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141618

Anderson, J. M., Li, J. & Springer, T. A. Regulation of integrin α5β1 conformational states and intrinsic affinities by metal ions and the ADMIDAS. Mol. Biol. Cell 33, ar56 (2022).

pubmed: 35108026 pmcid: 9265148 doi: 10.1091/mbc.E21-11-0536

Zhang, K. & Chen, J. The regulation of integrin function by divalent cations. Cell Adh. Migr. 6, 20–29 (2012).

pubmed: 22647937 pmcid: 3364134 doi: 10.4161/cam.18702

Takagi, J., Petre, B. M., Walz, T. & Springer, T. A. Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling. Cell 110, 599–611 (2002).

pubmed: 12230977 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00935-2

Campbell, I. D. & Humphries, M. J. Integrin structure, activation, and interactions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a004994 (2011).

pubmed: 21421922 pmcid: 3039929 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004994

Kolasangiani, R., Bidone, T. C. & Schwartz, M. A. Integrin conformational dynamics and mechanotransduction. Cells 11, 3584 (2022).

pubmed: 36429013 pmcid: 9688440 doi: 10.3390/cells11223584

Vinogradova, O. et al. A structural mechanism of integrin αIIbβ3 “inside-out” activation as regulated by its cytoplasmic face. Cell 110, 587–597 (2002). This study provides a structural mechanism by which a handshake between the α-subunit and the β-subunit cytoplasmic integrin tails restrains the integrin in a resting state and finds that unclasping of this interaction triggers the inside-out conformational signal that leads to receptor activation.

pubmed: 12230976 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6

Shafaq-Zadah, M. et al. Spatial N-glycan rearrangement on α

Cormier, A. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the αvβ8 integrin reveals a mechanism for stabilizing integrin extension. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 698–704 (2018).

pubmed: 30061598 pmcid: 6214843 doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0093-x

Schumacher, S. et al. Structural insights into integrin α5β1 opening by fibronectin ligand. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9716 (2021). This study reports cryo electron microscopy structures of human α5β1 integrin in its extended fibronectin-bound state and in its resting state in a half-bent conformation, and shows that affinity of α5β1 integrin for fibronectin is increased with manganese ions (Mn

pubmed: 33962943 pmcid: 8104898 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe9716

Li, J. et al. Ligand binding initiates single-molecule integrin conformational activation. Cell 187, 2990–3005.e17 (2024). This study uses fluorescence resonance energy transfer to investigate conformational regulation of α5β1 integrin, finding that ligand binding to bent integrin triggers rapid receptor extension and activation.

pubmed: 38772370 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.049

Askari, J. A. et al. Focal adhesions are sites of integrin extension. J. Cell Biol. 188, 891–903 (2010). This study uses fluorescence resonance energy transfer to demonstrate that integrin α5β1 is found in the extended conformation inside IACs.

pubmed: 20231384 pmcid: 2845069 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907174

Adair, B. D., Xiong, J.-P., Yeager, M. & Arnaout, M. A. Cryo-EM structures of full-length integrin αIIbβ3 in native lipids. Nat. Commun. 14, 4168 (2023). This work reports cryo electron microscopy structures of full-length αIIbβ3 integrin in its apo state in native cell membrane-based nanoparticles, showing that this integrin adopts the bent inactive state but with a fully accessible ligand-binding site. This finding challenges the model that this site is occluded by the plasma membrane.

pubmed: 37443315 pmcid: 10345127 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39763-0

Calderwood, D. A. et al. The talin head domain binds to integrin β subunit cytoplasmic tails and regulates integrin activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28071–28074 (1999).

pubmed: 10497155 doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28071

Haydari, Z., Shams, H., Jahed, Z. & Mofrad, M. R. K. Kindlin assists talin to promote integrin activation. Biophys. J. 118, 1977–1991 (2020).

pubmed: 32191864 pmcid: 7175420 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.02.023

Tiwari, S., Askari, J. A., Humphries, M. J. & Bulleid, N. J. Divalent cations regulate the folding and activation status of integrins during their intracellular trafficking. J. Cell Sci. 124, 1672–1680 (2011).

pubmed: 21511727 pmcid: 3085436 doi: 10.1242/jcs.084483

Grzesiak, J. J. & Pierschbacher, M. D. Shifts in the concentrations of magnesium and calcium in early porcine and rat wound fluids activate the cell migratory response. J. Clin. Invest. 95, 227–233 (1995).

pubmed: 7814620 pmcid: 295412 doi: 10.1172/JCI117644

Kong, F., García, A. J., Mould, A. P., Humphries, M. J. & Zhu, C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1275–1284 (2009). Using atomic force microscopy, this study observes triphasic force-dependent bond lifetimes that deviate from the Bell model, demonstrating fibronectin–α5β1 integrin catch bonds which provide a physical mechanism for integrin-mediated force sensing.

pubmed: 19564406 pmcid: 2712956 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810002

Bouvard, D., Pouwels, J., De Franceschi, N. & Ivaska, J. Integrin inactivators: balancing cellular functions in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 430–442 (2013).

pubmed: 23719537 doi: 10.1038/nrm3599

Kiema, T. et al. The molecular basis of filamin binding to integrins and competition with talin. Mol. Cell 21, 337–347 (2006).

pubmed: 16455489 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.011

Bouvard, D. et al. Disruption of focal adhesions by integrin cytoplasmic domain-associated protein-1α. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 6567–6574 (2003).

pubmed: 12473654 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211258200

Rantala, J. K. et al. SHARPIN is an endogenous inhibitor of β1-integrin activation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1315–1324 (2011).

pubmed: 21947080 pmcid: 3257806 doi: 10.1038/ncb2340

Pouwels, J. et al. SHARPIN regulates uropod detachment in migrating lymphocytes. Cell Rep. 5, 619–628 (2013).

pubmed: 24210817 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.011

Kasirer-Friede, A., Peuhu, E., Ivaska, J. & Shattil, S. J. Platelet SHARPIN regulates platelet adhesion and inflammatory responses through associations with αIIbβ3 and LUBAC. Blood Adv. 6, 2595–2607 (2022).

pubmed: 34991155 pmcid: 9043921 doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005611

Siitonen, R. et al.

pubmed: 30850498 pmcid: 6785786 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222026

Gao, J. et al. Sharpin suppresses β1-integrin activation by complexing with the β1 tail and kindlin-1. Cell Commun. Signal. 17, 101 (2019).

pubmed: 31429758 pmcid: 6700787 doi: 10.1186/s12964-019-0407-6

Horton, E. R. et al. Definition of a consensus integrin adhesome and its dynamics during adhesion complex assembly and disassembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 1577–1587 (2015).

pubmed: 26479319 pmcid: 4663675 doi: 10.1038/ncb3257

Zaidel-Bar, R., Itzkovitz, S., Ma’ayan, A., Iyengar, R. & Geiger, B. Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 858–867 (2007). This work presents a detailed description of the ‘integrin adhesome’, consisting of a complex network of 156 components linked together and modified by 690 interactions, revealing several functional ‘subnets’ that are involved in regulation of cell adhesion, migration and cytoskeletal organization.

pubmed: 17671451 pmcid: 2735470 doi: 10.1038/ncb0807-858

Chastney, M. R., Conway, J. R. W. & Ivaska, J. Integrin adhesion complexes. Curr. Biol. 31, R536–R542 (2021).

pubmed: 34033786 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.038

Conway, J. R. W. & Jacquemet, G. Cell matrix adhesion in cell migration. Essays Biochem. 63, 535–551 (2019).

pubmed: 31444228 doi: 10.1042/EBC20190012

Michael, M. & Parsons, M. New perspectives on integrin-dependent adhesions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 63, 31–37 (2020).

pubmed: 31945690 pmcid: 7262580 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.008

Choi, C. K. et al. Actin and α-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1039–1050 (2008).

pubmed: 19160484 pmcid: 2827253 doi: 10.1038/ncb1763

Changede, R., Xu, X., Margadant, F. & Sheetz, M. P. Nascent integrin adhesions form on all matrix rigidities after integrin activation. Dev. Cell 35, 614–621 (2015).

pubmed: 26625956 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.11.001

Hanein, D. & Horwitz, A. R. The structure of cell–matrix adhesions: the new frontier. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 134–140 (2012).

pubmed: 22196929 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.12.001

Zaidel-Bar, R., Ballestrem, C., Kam, Z. & Geiger, B. Early molecular events in the assembly of matrix adhesions at the leading edge of migrating cells. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4605–4613 (2003).

pubmed: 14576354 doi: 10.1242/jcs.00792

Bachir, A. I. et al. Integrin-associated complexes form hierarchically with variable stoichiometry in nascent adhesions. Curr. Biol. 24, 1845–1853 (2014). This work presents a hierarchical description of integrin-containing molecular complexes and their stoichiometry in nascent adhesions at high spatial and temporal resolution, establishing a model whereby transient α-actinin–integrin complexes help nucleate nascent adhesions within the lamellipodium.

pubmed: 25088556 pmcid: 4138543 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.011

Han, S. J. et al. Pre-complexation of talin and vinculin without tension is required for efficient nascent adhesion maturation. eLife 10, e66151 (2021). This article demonstrates that IAC components can preassemble in the cytoplasm and are incorporated into newly forming adhesions as ‘units’.

pubmed: 33783351 pmcid: 8009661 doi: 10.7554/eLife.66151

Zaidel-Bar, R., Cohen, M., Addadi, L. & Geiger, B. Hierarchical assembly of cell–matrix adhesion complexes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 32, 416–420 (2004).

pubmed: 15157150 doi: 10.1042/bst0320416

Han, S. J., Oak, Y., Groisman, A. & Danuser, G. Traction microscopy to identify force modulation in subresolution adhesions. Nat. Methods 12, 653–656 (2015).

pubmed: 26030446 pmcid: 4490115 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3430

Roca-Cusachs, P. et al. Integrin-dependent force transmission to the extracellular matrix by α-actinin triggers adhesion maturation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1361–E1370 (2013).

pubmed: 23515331 pmcid: 3625291 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220723110

Mathieu, M., Isomursu, A. & Ivaska, J. Positive and negative durotaxis—mechanisms and emerging concepts. J. Cell Sci. 137, jcs261919 (2024).

pubmed: 38647525 doi: 10.1242/jcs.261919

Atherton, P. et al. Tensin3 interaction with talin drives the formation of fibronectin-associated fibrillar adhesions. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202107022 (2022). This work demonstrates tensin 3 interaction with talin and the requirement of this talin–tensin 3 interaction in fibrillar adhesions and fibronectin fibrillogenesis.

pubmed: 36074065 pmcid: 9462884 doi: 10.1083/jcb.202107022

Barber-Pérez, N. et al. Mechano-responsiveness of fibrillar adhesions on stiffness-gradient gels. J. Cell Sci. 133, jcs242909 (2020).

pubmed: 32393601 pmcid: 7328166 doi: 10.1242/jcs.242909

Clark, K. et al. A specific α5β1-integrin conformation promotes directional integrin translocation and fibronectin matrix formation. J. Cell Sci. 118, 291–300 (2005).

pubmed: 15615773 doi: 10.1242/jcs.01623

Pankov, R. et al. Integrin dynamics and matrix assembly: tensin-dependent translocation of α5β1 integrins promotes early fibronectin fibrillogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 148, 1075–1090 (2000).

pubmed: 10704455 pmcid: 2174533 doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.5.1075

Zamir, E. et al. Dynamics and segregation of cell–matrix adhesions in cultured fibroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 191–196 (2000).

pubmed: 10783236 doi: 10.1038/35008607

Case, L. B., De Pasquale, M., Henry, L. & Rosen, M. K. Synergistic phase separation of two pathways promotes integrin clustering and nascent adhesion formation. eLife 11, e72588 (2022). This study finds that two IAC components, p130Cas and FAK, undergo LLPS in vitro and in cells, and that mutations inhibiting or enhancing phase separation in vitro respectively reduce or increase the number of IACs.

pubmed: 35049497 pmcid: 8791637 doi: 10.7554/eLife.72588

Cheng, X. & Case, L. B. Phase separation in chemical and mechanical signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 85, 102243 (2023).

pubmed: 37788587 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2023.102243

Guo, K. et al. KANK1 shapes focal adhesions by orchestrating protein binding, mechanical force sensing, and phase separation. Cell Rep. 42, 113321 (2023).

pubmed: 37874676 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113321

Lee, Y.-R. J., Yamada, S. & Lo, S. H. Phase transition of tensin-1 during the focal adhesion disassembly and cell division. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2303037120 (2023).

pubmed: 37011205 pmcid: 10104483 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2303037120

Wang, Y. et al. LIMD1 phase separation contributes to cellular mechanics and durotaxis by regulating focal adhesion dynamics in response to force. Dev. Cell 56, 1313–1325.e7 (2021).

pubmed: 33891898 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.002

Byron, A. et al. Characterisation of a nucleo-adhesome. Nat. Commun. 13, 3053 (2022).

pubmed: 35650196 pmcid: 9160004 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30556-5

Alanko, J. et al. Integrin endosomal signalling suppresses anoikis. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 1412–1421 (2015).

pubmed: 26436690 pmcid: 4890650 doi: 10.1038/ncb3250

Miao, M. Z. et al. Redox-active endosomes mediate α5β1 integrin signaling and promote chondrocyte matrix metalloproteinase production in osteoarthritis. Sci. Signal. 16, eadf8299 (2023). Together with Alanko et al. (2015), this study demonstrates active integrin signalling from endosomes, following integrin ligand stimulation and endocytosis, regulating either anchorage-independent cell survival or ROS signalling and matrix degradation.

pubmed: 37906629 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.adf8299

Jacquemet, G. et al. Filopodome mapping identifies p130Cas as a mechanosensitive regulator of filopodia stability. Curr. Biol. 29, 202–216.e7 (2019).

pubmed: 30639111 pmcid: 6345628 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.053

Lock, J. G. et al. Clathrin-containing adhesion complexes. J. Cell Biol. 218, 2086–2095 (2019).

pubmed: 31208994 pmcid: 6605790 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201811160

Walko, G., Castañón, M. J. & Wiche, G. Molecular architecture and function of the hemidesmosome. Cell Tissue Res. 360, 363–378 (2015).

pubmed: 25487405 doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-2061-z

te Molder, L., de Pereda, J. M. & Sonnenberg, A. Regulation of hemidesmosome dynamics and cell signaling by integrin α6β4. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs259004 (2021).

Lock, J. G. et al. Reticular adhesions are a distinct class of cell-matrix adhesions that mediate attachment during mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1290–1302 (2018). This seminal Review summarizes the new type of IAC-mediated adhesions and their potential implications for the field.

pubmed: 30361699 doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0220-2

Hakanpää, L. et al. Reticular adhesions are assembled at flat clathrin lattices and opposed by active integrin α5β1. J. Cell Biol. 222, e202303107 (2023).

pubmed: 37233325 pmcid: 10225744 doi: 10.1083/jcb.202303107

Zuidema, A., Wang, W. & Sonnenberg, A. Crosstalk between cell adhesion complexes in regulation of mechanotransduction. BioEssays 42, e2000119 (2020).

pubmed: 32830356 doi: 10.1002/bies.202000119

Elkhatib, N. et al. Tubular clathrin/AP-2 lattices pinch collagen fibers to support 3D cell migration. Science 356, eaal4713 (2017).

pubmed: 28619886 doi: 10.1126/science.aal4713

Zhang, W. et al. Curved adhesions mediate cell attachment to soft matrix fibres in three dimensions. Nat. Cell Biol. 25, 1453–1464 (2023).

pubmed: 37770566 pmcid: 10567576 doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01238-1

Fujiwara, T. K. et al. Ultrafast single-molecule imaging reveals focal adhesion nano-architecture and molecular dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 222, e202110162 (2023).

pubmed: 37278764 pmcid: 10244807 doi: 10.1083/jcb.202110162

Spiess, M. et al. Active and inactive β1 integrins segregate into distinct nanoclusters in focal adhesions. J. Cell Biol. 217, 1929–1940 (2018).

pubmed: 29632027 pmcid: 5987715 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201707075

Hu, S. et al. Structured illumination microscopy reveals focal adhesions are composed of linear subunits. Cytoskeleton 72, 235–245 (2015).

pubmed: 26012525 doi: 10.1002/cm.21223

Cheng, B. et al. Nanoscale integrin cluster dynamics controls cellular mechanosensing via FAKY397 phosphorylation. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax1909 (2020).

pubmed: 32181337 pmcid: 7056303 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax1909

Changede, R., Cai, H., Wind, S. J. & Sheetz, M. P. Integrin nanoclusters can bridge thin matrix fibres to form cell–matrix adhesions. Nat. Mater. 18, 1366–1375 (2019).

pubmed: 31477904 pmcid: 7455205 doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0460-y

Di Russo, J. et al. Integrin α5β1 nano-presentation regulates collective keratinocyte migration independent of substrate rigidity. eLife 10, e69861 (2021).

pubmed: 34554089 pmcid: 8460267 doi: 10.7554/eLife.69861

Hennig, K. et al. Stick-slip dynamics of cell adhesion triggers spontaneous symmetry breaking and directional migration of mesenchymal cells on one-dimensional lines. Sci. Adv. 6, eaau5670 (2020). This study fabricates thin 1D ECM lines, mimicking in vivo tissue ECM fibres, and describes experimentally and theoretically how a generic stick–slip behaviour initiated by contractility-dependent stochastic detachment of adhesive contacts at one side of the cell is sufficient to trigger cell motility in one dimension in the absence of pre-established polarity.

pubmed: 31921998 pmcid: 6941913 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau5670

Le Saux, G. et al. Spacing of integrin ligands influences signal transduction in endothelial cells. Biophys. J. 101, 764–773 (2011).

pubmed: 21843466 pmcid: 3175083 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.06.064

Oria, R. et al. Force loading explains spatial sensing of ligands by cells. Nature 552, 219–224 (2017). This study challenges the notion of a ‘molecular ruler’ in dictating cell adhesion responses to differentially spaced ECM ligands and provides, using the molecular-clutch model, a general framework for how cells sense spatial and physical information at the nanoscale.

pubmed: 29211717 doi: 10.1038/nature24662

Cavalcanti-Adam, E. A. et al. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys. J. 92, 2964–2974 (2007).

pubmed: 17277192 pmcid: 1831685 doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.089730

Hawkes, W. et al. Regulation of cardiomyocyte adhesion and mechanosignalling through distinct nanoscale behaviour of integrin ligands mimicking healthy or fibrotic extracellular matrix. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 377, 20220021 (2022).

doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0021

Levario-Diaz, V. et al. 1D micro-nanopatterned integrin ligand surfaces for directed cell movement. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 972624 (2022).

pubmed: 36531964 pmcid: 9755580 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.972624

Young, J. L., Holle, A. W. & Spatz, J. P. Nanoscale and mechanical properties of the physiological cell–ECM microenvironment. Exp. Cell Res. 343, 3–6 (2016).

pubmed: 26524509 doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.037

Wallace, J. M. et al. Type I collagen exists as a distribution of nanoscale morphologies in teeth, bones, and tendons. Langmuir 26, 7349–7354 (2010).

pubmed: 20121266 pmcid: 2868935 doi: 10.1021/la100006a

Früh, S. M., Schoen, I., Ries, J. & Vogel, V. Molecular architecture of native fibronectin fibrils. Nat. Commun. 6, 7275 (2015).

pubmed: 26041410 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8275

Reuten, R., Mayorca-Guiliani, A. E. & Erler, J. T. Matritecture: mapping the extracellular matrix architecture during health and disease. Matrix Biol. 14, 100102 (2022).

doi: 10.1016/j.mbplus.2022.100102

Pally, D. & Naba, A. Extracellular matrix dynamics: a key regulator of cell migration across length-scales and systems. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 86, 102309 (2024).

pubmed: 38183892 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2023.102309

Dibus, M., Joshi, O. & Ivaska, J. Novel tools to study cell–ECM interactions, cell adhesion dynamics and migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 88, 102355 (2024).

pubmed: 38631101 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2024.102355

Conway, J. R. W. et al. Defined extracellular matrix compositions support stiffness-insensitive cell spreading and adhesion signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2304288120 (2023). This study analyses cell spreading on arrays of different ECM components printed on soft and stiff hydrogels to demonstrate that availability of ECM ligands and the integrins they engage jointly determines cell behaviour in response to matrix rigidity and can trigger ‘stiff-like’ cell spreading on soft substrate.

pubmed: 37844244 pmcid: 10614832 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2304288120

Isomursu, A. et al. Dynamic micropatterning reveals substrate‐dependent differences in the geometric control of cell polarization and migration. Small Methods 8, e2300719 (2024).

pubmed: 37926786 doi: 10.1002/smtd.202300719

Franco, S. J. et al. Calpain-mediated proteolysis of talin regulates adhesion dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 977–983 (2004).

pubmed: 15448700 doi: 10.1038/ncb1175

Moreno-Layseca, P. et al. Cargo-specific recruitment in clathrin- and dynamin-independent endocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 1073–1084 (2021).

pubmed: 34616024 doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00767-x

Zaidel-Bar, R., Milo, R., Kam, Z. & Geiger, B. A paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation switch regulates the assembly and form of cell–matrix adhesions. J. Cell Sci. 120, 137–148 (2007).

pubmed: 17164291 doi: 10.1242/jcs.03314

Wilhelmsen, K. et al. Serine phosphorylation of the integrin β4 subunit is necessary for epidermal growth factor receptor-induced hemidesmosome disruption. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3512–3522 (2007).

pubmed: 17615294 pmcid: 1951768 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-04-0306

Ezratty, E. J., Partridge, M. A. & Gundersen, G. G. Microtubule-induced focal adhesion disassembly is mediated by dynamin and focal adhesion kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 581–590 (2005).

pubmed: 15895076 doi: 10.1038/ncb1262

Seetharaman, S. & Etienne-Manneville, S. Microtubules at focal adhesions—a double-edged sword. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs232843 (2019).

pubmed: 31597743 doi: 10.1242/jcs.232843

Yao, M. et al. Force- and cell state-dependent recruitment of Piezo1 drives focal adhesion dynamics and calcium entry. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo1461 (2022).

pubmed: 36351022 pmcid: 9645726 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo1461

Chan, K. T., Bennin, D. A. & Huttenlocher, A. Regulation of adhesion dynamics by calpain-mediated proteolysis of focal adhesion kinase (FAK). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11418–11426 (2010).

pubmed: 20150423 pmcid: 2857020 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.090746

Ezratty, E. J., Bertaux, C., Marcantonio, E. E. & Gundersen, G. G. Clathrin mediates integrin endocytosis for focal adhesion disassembly in migrating cells. J. Cell Biol. 187, 733–747 (2009).

pubmed: 19951918 pmcid: 2806590 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200904054

Yue, J. et al. Microtubules regulate focal adhesion dynamics through MAP4K4. Dev. Cell 31, 572–585 (2014).

pubmed: 25490267 pmcid: 4261153 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.025

Kenific, C. M. et al. NBR1 enables autophagy-dependent focal adhesion turnover. J. Cell Biol. 212, 577–590 (2016).

pubmed: 26903539 pmcid: 4772495 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201503075

Sharifi, M. N. et al. Autophagy promotes focal adhesion disassembly and cell motility of metastatic tumor cells through the direct interaction of paxillin with LC3. Cell Rep. 15, 1660–1672 (2016).

pubmed: 27184837 pmcid: 4880529 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.065

Juanes, M. A. et al. The role of APC-mediated actin assembly in microtubule capture and focal adhesion turnover. J. Cell Biol. 218, 3415–3435 (2019).

pubmed: 31471457 pmcid: 6781439 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201904165

Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Sarkar, A. & Wang, X. Keratocytes generate high integrin tension at the trailing edge to mediate rear de-adhesion during rapid cell migration. iScience 9, 502–512 (2018).

pubmed: 30472533 pmcid: 6257914 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.11.016

llić, D. et al. Reduced cell motility and enhanced focal adhesion contact formation in cells from FAK-deficient mice. Nature 377, 539–544 (1995).

doi: 10.1038/377539a0

Webb, D. J. et al. FAK–Src signalling through paxillin, ERK and MLCK regulates adhesion disassembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 154–161 (2004).

pubmed: 14743221 doi: 10.1038/ncb1094

Li, X., Combs, J. D., Salaita, K. & Shu, X. Polarized focal adhesion kinase activity within a focal adhesion during cell migration. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1458–1468 (2023).

pubmed: 37349581 pmcid: 10732478 doi: 10.1038/s41589-023-01353-y

Jones, M. C., Askari, J. A., Humphries, J. D. & Humphries, M. J. Cell adhesion is regulated by CDK1 during the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 217, 3203–3218 (2018).

pubmed: 29930204 pmcid: 6122981 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201802088

Gough, R. E. et al. Talin mechanosensitivity is modulated by a direct interaction with cyclin-dependent kinase-1. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 100837 (2021).

pubmed: 34118235 pmcid: 8260872 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100837

Kaverina, I., Krylyshkina, O. & Small, J. V. Microtubule targeting of substrate contacts promotes their relaxation and dissociation. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1033–1044 (1999).

pubmed: 10477757 pmcid: 2169483 doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.5.1033

Stehbens, S. J. et al. CLASPs link focal-adhesion-associated microtubule capture to localized exocytosis and adhesion site turnover. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 558–570 (2014).

doi: 10.1038/ncb2975

Tadijan, A., Samaržija, I., Humphries, J. D., Humphries, M. J. & Ambriović-Ristov, A. KANK family proteins in cancer. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 131, 105903 (2021).

pubmed: 33309958 doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2020.105903

Bouchet, B. P. et al. Talin–KANK1 interaction controls the recruitment of cortical microtubule stabilizing complexes to focal adhesions. eLife 5, e18124 (2016).

pubmed: 27410476 pmcid: 4995097 doi: 10.7554/eLife.18124

Sun, Z. et al. Kank2 activates talin, reduces force transduction across integrins and induces central adhesion formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 941–953 (2016).

pubmed: 27548916 pmcid: 6053543 doi: 10.1038/ncb3402

Li, X., Goult, B. T., Ballestrem, C. & Zacharchenko, T. The structural basis of the talin–KANK1 interaction that coordinates the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons at focal adhesions. Open. Biol. 13, 230058 (2023).

pubmed: 37339751 pmcid: 10281804 doi: 10.1098/rsob.230058

Théry, M., Pépin, A., Dressaire, E., Chen, Y. & Bornens, M. Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 63, 341–355 (2006).

pubmed: 16550544 doi: 10.1002/cm.20126

Lee, G., Han, S.-B. & Kim, D.-H. Cell–ECM contact-guided intracellular polarization is mediated via lamin A/C dependent nucleus-cytoskeletal connection. Biomaterials 268, 120548 (2021).

pubmed: 33260092 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120548

Autenrieth, T. J. et al. Actomyosin contractility and RhoGTPases affect cell-polarity and directional migration during haptotaxis. Integr. Biol. 8, 1067–1078 (2016).

doi: 10.1039/c6ib00152a

Lo, C.-M., Wang, H.-B., Dembo, M. & Wang, Y. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 79, 144–152 (2000).

pubmed: 10866943 pmcid: 1300921 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76279-5

Isomursu, A. et al. Directed cell migration towards softer environments. Nat. Mater. 21, 1081–1090 (2022).

pubmed: 35817964 pmcid: 10712428 doi: 10.1038/s41563-022-01294-2

Park, J., Kim, D.-H. & Levchenko, A. Topotaxis: a new mechanism of directed cell migration in topographic ECM gradients. Biophys. J. 114, 1257–1263 (2018).

pubmed: 29590582 pmcid: 5883610 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.3813

Fischer, R. S. et al. Contractility, focal adhesion orientation, and stress fiber orientation drive cancer cell polarity and migration along wavy ECM substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021135118 (2021). This study designs nanotopographic ECM-coated substrates that mimic collagen fibril waveforms seen in tumours and healthy tissues, and demonstrates that wave amplitude and cell contractility determine how cancer cells polarize and migrate. The study proposes that sufficiently high-amplitude ECM waves around tumours may serve as ‘cell polarization barriers’, decreasing directional migration of tumour cells.

pubmed: 34031242 pmcid: 8179222 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021135118

Zimmerman, S. P., Asokan, S. B., Kuhlman, B. & Bear, J. E. Cells lay their own tracks—optogenetic Cdc42 activation stimulates fibronectin deposition supporting directed migration. J. Cell Sci. 130, 2971–2983 (2017).

pubmed: 28754687 pmcid: 5612177 doi: 10.1242/jcs.205948

Sarkar, A., LeVine, D. N., Kuzmina, N., Zhao, Y. & Wang, X. Cell migration driven by self-generated integrin ligand gradient on ligand-labile surfaces. Curr. Biol. 30, 4022–4032.e5 (2020). This work reports a unique mode of cell migration whereby the cells generate a gradient of ligand surface density underneath the cell body by constantly rupturing labile integrin ligands in a manner that drives and guides cell migration.

pubmed: 32916117 pmcid: 7578120 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.020

Clark, A. G. et al. Self-generated gradients steer collective migration on viscoelastic collagen networks. Nat. Mater. 21, 1200–1210 (2022).

pubmed: 35637338 doi: 10.1038/s41563-022-01259-5

Winkler, J., Abisoye-Ogunniyan, A., Metcalf, K. J. & Werb, Z. Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour progression and metastasis. Nat. Commun. 11, 5120 (2020).

pubmed: 33037194 pmcid: 7547708 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18794-x

Hebert, J. D. et al. Proteomic profiling of the ECM of xenograft breast cancer metastases in different organs reveals distinct metastatic niches. Cancer Res. 80, 1475–1485 (2020).

pubmed: 32019869 pmcid: 7127975 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2961

Papanicolaou, M. et al. Temporal profiling of the breast tumour microenvironment reveals collagen XII as a driver of metastasis. Nat. Commun. 13, 4587 (2022).

pubmed: 35933466 pmcid: 9357007 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32255-7

Su, C. et al. The biological functions and clinical applications of integrins in cancers. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 579068 (2020).

pubmed: 33041823 pmcid: 7522798 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.579068

Cooper, J. & Giancotti, F. G. Integrin signaling in cancer: mechanotransduction, stemness, epithelial plasticity, and therapeutic resistance. Cancer Cell 35, 347–367 (2019).

pubmed: 30889378 pmcid: 6684107 doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.01.007

Dongre, A. & Weinberg, R. A. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 69–84 (2019).

pubmed: 30459476 doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0080-4

Margadant, C. & Sonnenberg, A. Integrin–TGF‐β crosstalk in fibrosis, cancer and wound healing. EMBO Rep. 11, 97–105 (2010).

pubmed: 20075988 pmcid: 2828749 doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.276

Buckley, C. E. & St Johnston, D. Apical–basal polarity and the control of epithelial form and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 559–577 (2022).

pubmed: 35440694 doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00465-y

Pora, A., Yoon, S., Windoffer, R. & Leube, R. E. Hemidesmosomes and focal adhesions treadmill as separate but linked entities during keratinocyte migration. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139, 1876–1888.e4 (2019).

pubmed: 30951704 doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.03.1139

Colburn, Z. T. & Jones, J. C. R. α6β4 integrin regulates the collective migration of epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 56, 443–452 (2017).

pubmed: 27922761 pmcid: 5449516 doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0313OC

Nisticò, P., Di Modugno, F., Spada, S. & Bissell, M. J. β1 and β4 integrins: from breast development to clinical practice. Breast Cancer Res. 16, 459 (2014).

pubmed: 25606594 pmcid: 4384274 doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0459-x

Knox, J. D. et al. Differential expression of extracellular matrix molecules and the α6-integrins in the normal and neoplastic prostate. Am. J. Pathol. 145, 167–174 (1994).

pubmed: 8030747 pmcid: 1887289

Wenta, T. et al. Disassembly of α6β4-mediated hemidesmosomal adhesions promotes tumorigenesis in PTEN-negative prostate cancer by targeting plectin to focal adhesions. Oncogene 41, 3804–3820 (2022).

pubmed: 35773413 pmcid: 9307480 doi: 10.1038/s41388-022-02389-5

Schmidt, A., Kaakinen, M., Wenta, T. & Manninen, A. Loss of α6β4 integrin-mediated hemidesmosomes promotes prostate epithelial cell migration by stimulating focal adhesion dynamics. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 886569 (2022).

pubmed: 35874837 pmcid: 9301336 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.886569

Canel, M., Serrels, A., Frame, M. C. & Brunton, V. G. E-cadherin–integrin crosstalk in cancer invasion and metastasis. J. Cell Sci. 126, 393–401 (2013).

pubmed: 23525005 doi: 10.1242/jcs.100115

Bejar-Padilla, V. et al. α-Catenin-dependent vinculin recruitment to adherens junctions is antagonistic to focal adhesions. Mol. Biol. Cell 33, 1–9 (2022).

doi: 10.1091/mbc.E22-02-0071

Borghi, N., Lowndes, M., Maruthamuthu, V., Gardel, M. L. & Nelson, W. J. Regulation of cell motile behavior by crosstalk between cadherin- and integrin-mediated adhesions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 13324–13329 (2010).

pubmed: 20566866 pmcid: 2922157 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002662107

Huber, M., Casares-Arias, J., Fässler, R., Müller, D. J. & Strohmeyer, N. In mitosis integrins reduce adhesion to extracellular matrix and strengthen adhesion to adjacent cells. Nat. Commun. 14, 2143 (2023). This study demonstrates a functional role for unengaged β1 integrins in strengthening the cell–cell adhesion of mitotic cells to adjacent cells, supported by vinculin, kindlin and talin 1.

pubmed: 37059721 pmcid: 10104879 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37760-x

Hadjisavva, R., Anastasiou, O., Ioannou, P. S., Zheltkova, M. & Skourides, P. A. Adherens junctions stimulate and spatially guide integrin activation and extracellular matrix deposition. Cell Rep. 40, 111091 (2022).

pubmed: 35858563 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111091

Figueiredo, J. et al. Integrin β1 orchestrates the abnormal cell-matrix attachment and invasive behaviour of E-cadherin dysfunctional cells. Gastric Cancer 25, 124–137 (2022).

pubmed: 34486077 doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01239-9

Roskoski, R. Src kinase regulation by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 331, 1–14 (2005).

pubmed: 15845350 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.012

Howden, J. D., Michael, M., Hight-Warburton, W. & Parsons, M. α2β1 integrins spatially restrict Cdc42 activity to stabilise adherens junctions. BMC Biol. 19, 130 (2021).

pubmed: 34158053 pmcid: 8220754 doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01054-9

Kilinc, A. N., Han, S., Barrett, L. A., Anandasivam, N. & Nelson, C. M. Integrin-linked kinase tunes cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesions to regulate the switch between apoptosis and EMT downstream of TGFβ1. Mol. Biol. Cell 32, 402–412 (2021).

pubmed: 33405954 pmcid: 8098849 doi: 10.1091/mbc.E20-02-0092

Goodwin, K. et al. Cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix adhesions cooperate to organize actomyosin networks and maintain force transmission during dorsal closure. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 1301–1310 (2017).

pubmed: 28331071 pmcid: 5426845 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e17-01-0033

Kim, L. T. & Yamada, K. M. Evidence that β1 integrins in keratinocyte cell–cell junctions are not in the ligand-occupied conformation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 108, 876–880 (1997).

pubmed: 9182814 doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12292589

Thölmann, S. et al. JAM-A interacts with α3β1 integrin and tetraspanins CD151 and CD9 to regulate collective cell migration of polarized epithelial cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 88 (2022).

pubmed: 35067832 pmcid: 8784505 doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04140-5

Yang, J. et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 341–352 (2020).

pubmed: 32300252 pmcid: 7250738 doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9

Gandalovičová, A., Vomastek, T., Rosel, D. & Brábek, J. Cell polarity signaling in the plasticity of cancer cell invasiveness. Oncotarget 7, 25022–25049 (2016).

pubmed: 26872368 pmcid: 5041887 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7214

Lambert, A. W., Pattabiraman, D. R. & Weinberg, R. A. Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell 168, 670–691 (2017).

pubmed: 28187288 pmcid: 5308465 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.037

Bornes, L., Belthier, G. & van Rheenen, J. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the light of plasticity and hybrid E/M states. J. Clin. Med. 10, 2403 (2021).

pubmed: 34072345 pmcid: 8197992 doi: 10.3390/jcm10112403

Jolly, M. K. et al. Hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotypes promote metastasis and therapy resistance across carcinomas. Pharmacol. Ther. 194, 161–184 (2019).

pubmed: 30268772 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.09.007

Kariya, Y., Oyama, M., Suzuki, T. & Kariya, Y. αvβ3 integrin induces partial EMT independent of TGF-β signaling. Commun. Biol. 4, 490 (2021).

Yamashita, N. et al. Epithelial paradox: clinical significance of coexpression of E-cadherin and vimentin with regard to invasion and metastasis of breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 18, e1003–e1009 (2018).

pubmed: 29526677 doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.02.002

Wei, S. C. et al. Matrix stiffness drives epithelial–mesenchymal transition and tumour metastasis through a TWIST1–G3BP2 mechanotransduction pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 678–688 (2015).

pubmed: 25893917 pmcid: 4452027 doi: 10.1038/ncb3157

Rice, A. J. et al. Matrix stiffness induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition and promotes chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogenesis 6, e352 (2017).

pubmed: 28671675 pmcid: 5541706 doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2017.54

Fattet, L. et al. Matrix rigidity controls epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity and tumor metastasis via a mechanoresponsive EPHA2/LYN complex. Dev. Cell 54, 302–316.e7 (2020).

pubmed: 32574556 pmcid: 7423770 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.05.031

Munger, J. S. & Sheppard, D. Cross talk among TGF-β signaling pathways, integrins, and the extracellular matrix. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a005017 (2011).

pubmed: 21900405 pmcid: 3220354 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005017

Machado Brandão-Costa, R. et al. Extracellular matrix derived from high metastatic human breast cancer triggers epithelial–mesenchymal transition in epithelial breast cancer cells through αvβ3 integrin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2995 (2020).

pmcid: 7216035 doi: 10.3390/ijms21082995

Loh, C.-Y. et al. The E-cadherin and N-cadherin switch in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition: signaling, therapeutic implications, and challenges. Cells 8, 1118 (2019).

pubmed: 31547193 pmcid: 6830116 doi: 10.3390/cells8101118

Li, X.-L. et al. Integrin β4 promotes cell invasion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition through the modulation of Slug expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 7, 40464 (2017).

pubmed: 28084395 pmcid: 5233967 doi: 10.1038/srep40464

Cruz, S. P. et al. Dampened regulatory circuitry of TEAD1/ITGA1/ITGA2 promotes TGFβ1 signaling to orchestrate prostate cancer progression. Adv. Sci. 11, e2305547 (2024).

doi: 10.1002/advs.202305547

Sasaki, N. et al. TGF-β1 increases cellular invasion of colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma cell line through partial epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 30, 101239 (2022).

pubmed: 35252596 pmcid: 8891970

Huang, W., Zhu, J., Shi, H., Wu, Q. & Zhang, C. ITGA2 overexpression promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma aggression via FAK/AKT signaling pathway. Onco. Targets Ther. 14, 3583–3596 (2021).

pubmed: 34113124 pmcid: 8185252 doi: 10.2147/OTT.S302028

Gaballa, R. et al. Exosomes-mediated transfer of Itga2 promotes migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells by inducing epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Cancers 12, 2300 (2020).

pubmed: 32824235 pmcid: 7466113 doi: 10.3390/cancers12082300

Salemi, Z., Azizi, R., Fallahian, F. & Aghaei, M. Integrin α2β1 inhibition attenuates prostate cancer cell proliferation by cell cycle arrest, promoting apoptosis and reducing epithelial–mesenchymal transition. J. Cell. Physiol. 236, 4954–4965 (2021).

pubmed: 33305380 doi: 10.1002/jcp.30202

Kai, F., Drain, A. P. & Weaver, V. M. The extracellular matrix modulates the metastatic journey. Dev. Cell 49, 332–346 (2019).

pubmed: 31063753 pmcid: 6527347 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.026

Chang, J. & Chaudhuri, O. Beyond proteases: basement membrane mechanics and cancer invasion. J. Cell Biol. 218, 2456–2469 (2019).

pubmed: 31315943 pmcid: 6683740 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201903066

Vilchez Mercedes, S. A. et al. Decoding leader cells in collective cancer invasion. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 592–604 (2021).

pubmed: 34239104 doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00376-8

Friedl, P., Locker, J., Sahai, E. & Segall, J. E. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 777–783 (2012).

pubmed: 22854810 doi: 10.1038/ncb2548

Baschieri, F. et al. Fibroblasts generate topographical cues that steer cancer cell migration. Sci. Adv. 9, eade2120 (2023). This work reports that migrating fibroblasts deposit a network of tubular structures on their substrate that serves as a guidance cue for cancer cell migration. As footprint deposition increases with substrate rigidity, these cues can regulate stiffness-guided directional cell migration.

pubmed: 37585527 pmcid: 10431708 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade2120

Fan, C. et al. Cell migration orchestrates migrasome formation by shaping retraction fibers. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202109168 (2022).

pubmed: 35179563 pmcid: 9195050 doi: 10.1083/jcb.202109168

Castro-Castro, A. et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of MT1-MMP-dependent cancer cell invasion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 555–576 (2016).

pubmed: 27501444 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125227

Yamada, K. M., Doyle, A. D. & Lu, J. Cell–3D matrix interactions: recent advances and opportunities. Trends Cell Biol. 32, 883–895 (2022).

pubmed: 35410820 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.03.002

Nazari, S. S., Doyle, A. D. & Yamada, K. M. Mechanisms of basement membrane micro-perforation during cancer cell invasion into a 3D collagen gel. Gels 8, 567 (2022).

pubmed: 36135279 pmcid: 9498339 doi: 10.3390/gels8090567

Nazari, S. S., Doyle, A. D., Bleck, C. K. E. & Yamada, K. M. Long prehensile protrusions can facilitate cancer cell invasion through the basement membrane. Cells 12, 2474 (2023).

pubmed: 37887318 pmcid: 10605924 doi: 10.3390/cells12202474

Glentis, A. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce metalloprotease-independent cancer cell invasion of the basement membrane. Nat. Commun. 8, 924 (2017).

pubmed: 29030636 pmcid: 5640679 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00985-8

Peuhu, E. et al. MYO10-filopodia support basement membranes at pre-invasive tumor boundaries. Dev. Cell 57, 2350–2364.e7 (2022).

pubmed: 36283390 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.09.016

Chang, J. et al. Cell volume expansion and local contractility drive collective invasion of the basement membrane in breast cancer. Nat. Mater. 23, 711–722 (2024).

pubmed: 37957268 doi: 10.1038/s41563-023-01716-9

Mustafa, S., Koran, S. & AlOmair, L. Insights into the role of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer and its various therapeutic aspects: a review. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 896099 (2022).

pubmed: 36250005 pmcid: 9557123 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.896099

Yue, J., Zhang, K. & Chen, J. Role of integrins in regulating proteases to mediate extracellular matrix remodeling. Cancer Microenviron. 5, 275–283 (2012).

pubmed: 22437309 pmcid: 3460049 doi: 10.1007/s12307-012-0101-3

Niland, S. & Eble, J. A. Hold on or cut? Integrin- and MMP-mediated cell–matrix interactions in the tumor microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 238 (2020).

pubmed: 33379400 pmcid: 7794804 doi: 10.3390/ijms22010238

Mori, H. et al. Transmembrane/cytoplasmic, rather than catalytic, domains of Mmp14 signal to MAPK activation and mammary branching morphogenesis via binding to integrin β1. Development 140, 343–352 (2013).

pubmed: 23250208 pmcid: 3597211 doi: 10.1242/dev.084236

Grafinger, O. R., Gorshtein, G., Stirling, T., Brasher, M. I. & Coppolino, M. G. β1 integrin-mediated signaling regulates MT1-MMP phosphorylation to promote tumor cell invasion. J. Cell Sci. 133, jcs239152 (2020).

pubmed: 32205364 doi: 10.1242/jcs.239152

Grafinger, O. R., Gorshtein, G., Stirling, T., Geddes-McAlister, J. & Coppolino, M. G. Inhibition of β1 integrin induces its association with MT1-MMP and decreases MT1-MMP internalization and cellular invasiveness. Cell. Signal. 83, 109984 (2021).

pubmed: 33744418 doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.109984

Longmate, W. M., Miskin, R. P., Van De Water, L. & DiPersio, C. M. Epidermal integrin α3β1 regulates tumor-derived proteases BMP-1, matrix metalloprotease-9, and matrix metalloprotease-3. JID Innov. 1, 100017 (2021).

pubmed: 34909716 pmcid: 8659409 doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100017

Afshar, K., Sanaei, M., Ravari, M. S., Pourbagheri‐Sigaroodi, A. & Bashash, D. An overview of extracellular matrix and its remodeling in the development of cancer and metastasis with a glance at therapeutic approaches. Cell Biochem. Funct. 41, 930–952 (2023).

pubmed: 37665068 doi: 10.1002/cbf.3846

Niland, S., Riscanevo, A. X. & Eble, J. A. Matrix metalloproteinases shape the tumor microenvironment in cancer progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 146 (2021).

pubmed: 35008569 pmcid: 8745566 doi: 10.3390/ijms23010146

Kwon, Y. et al. Multi-layered proteogenomic analysis unravels cancer metastasis directed by MMP-2 and focal adhesion kinase signaling. Sci. Rep. 11, 17130 (2021).

pubmed: 34429501 pmcid: 8385024 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96635-7

Linder, S., Wiesner, C. & Himmel, M. Degrading devices: invadosomes in proteolytic cell invasion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 185–211 (2011).

pubmed: 21801014 doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154216

Monteiro, P. et al. A mechanosensitive caveolae–invadosome interplay drives matrix remodelling for cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 25, 1787–1803 (2023). This study describes a new mechanism of cancer cell-mediated collagen matrix remodelling through juxtaposed caveola clusters and matrix-degradative invadosomes at contact sites between the plasma membrane of cancer cells and collagen fibres.

pubmed: 37903910 pmcid: 10709148 doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01272-z

Jiao, Y. et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 promotes αvβ3 integrin-mediated adhesion and migration of human melanoma cells by cleaving fibronectin. PLoS ONE 7, e41591 (2012).

pubmed: 22848537 pmcid: 3407216 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041591

Das, A., Monteiro, M., Barai, A., Kumar, S. & Sen, S. MMP proteolytic activity regulates cancer invasiveness by modulating integrins. Sci. Rep. 7, 14219 (2017).

pubmed: 29079818 pmcid: 5660204 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14340-w

Labernadie, A. et al. A mechanically active heterotypic E-cadherin/N-cadherin adhesion enables fibroblasts to drive cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 224–237 (2017).

pubmed: 28218910 pmcid: 5831988 doi: 10.1038/ncb3478

Gaggioli, C. et al. Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 1392–1400 (2007).

pubmed: 18037882 doi: 10.1038/ncb1658

Carey, S. P., Starchenko, A., McGregor, A. L. & Reinhart-King, C. A. Leading malignant cells initiate collective epithelial cell invasion in a three-dimensional heterotypic tumor spheroid model. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 30, 615–630 (2013).

pubmed: 23328900 pmcid: 3646083 doi: 10.1007/s10585-013-9565-x

Cheung, K. J., Gabrielson, E., Werb, Z. & Ewald, A. J. Collective invasion in breast cancer requires a conserved basal epithelial program. Cell 155, 1639–1651 (2013).

pubmed: 24332913 pmcid: 3941206 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.029

Westcott, J. M. et al. An epigenetically distinct breast cancer cell subpopulation promotes collective invasion. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 1927–1943 (2015).

pubmed: 25844900 pmcid: 4463195 doi: 10.1172/JCI77767

Lichtenberg, J. Y. et al. Leader cells mechanically respond to aligned collagen architecture to direct collective migration. PLoS ONE 19, e0296153 (2024).

pubmed: 38165954 pmcid: 10760762 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296153

Jacquemet, G. et al. FiloQuant reveals increased filopodia density during breast cancer progression. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3387–3403 (2017).

pubmed: 28765364 pmcid: 5626550 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201704045

Pekkonen, P. et al. Lymphatic endothelium stimulates melanoma metastasis and invasion via MMP14-dependent Notch3 and β1-integrin activation. eLife 7, e32490 (2018).

pubmed: 29712618 pmcid: 5929907 doi: 10.7554/eLife.32490

Yamaguchi, N., Mizutani, T., Kawabata, K. & Haga, H. Leader cells regulate collective cell migration via Rac activation in the downstream signaling of integrin β1 and PI3K. Sci. Rep. 5, 7656 (2015).

pubmed: 25563751 pmcid: 5379035 doi: 10.1038/srep07656

Attieh, Y. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts lead tumor invasion through integrin-β3-dependent fibronectin assembly. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3509–3520 (2017).

pubmed: 28931556 pmcid: 5674886 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201702033

Erdogan, B. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote directional cancer cell migration by aligning fibronectin. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3799–3816 (2017).

pubmed: 29021221 pmcid: 5674895 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201704053

Summerbell, E. R. et al. Epigenetically heterogeneous tumor cells direct collective invasion through filopodia-driven fibronectin micropatterning. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz6197 (2020).

pubmed: 32832657 pmcid: 7439406 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6197

Arjonen, A. et al. Mutant p53-associated myosin-X upregulation promotes breast cancer invasion and metastasis. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1069–1082 (2014).

pubmed: 24487586 pmcid: 3934176 doi: 10.1172/JCI67280

Hwang, P. Y. et al. A Cdh3–β-catenin–laminin signaling axis in a subset of breast tumor leader cells control leader cell polarization and directional collective migration. Dev. Cell 58, 34–50.e9 (2023). This study investigates breast tumour organoid invasion into stroma using a 3D microfluidic system and 3D computational models, and demonstrates that leader cells generate their own laminin–IAC gradient and high protrusive forces to invade and overcome ECM resistance.

pubmed: 36626870 pmcid: 10010282 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.12.005

Ferrari, R. et al. MT1-MMP directs force-producing proteolytic contacts that drive tumor cell invasion. Nat. Commun. 10, 4886 (2019).

pubmed: 31653854 pmcid: 6814785 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12930-y

Sung, B. H., Parent, C. A. & Weaver, A. M. Extracellular vesicles: critical players during cell migration. Dev. Cell 56, 1861–1874 (2021).

pubmed: 33811804 pmcid: 8282723 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.03.020

Friedl, P. et al. Migration of highly aggressive MV3 melanoma cells in 3-dimensional collagen lattices results in local matrix reorganization and shedding of ɑ2 and β1 integrins and CD44. Cancer Res. 57, 2061–2070 (1997).

pubmed: 9158006

Sung, B. H. et al. A live cell reporter of exosome secretion and uptake reveals pathfinding behavior of migrating cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 2092 (2020). This study uses an improved live cell reporter to visualize secreted exosomes in 3D culture and in vivo, and identifies a role for exosomes in promoting leader–follower behaviour in 2D and 3D migration.

pubmed: 32350252 pmcid: 7190671 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15747-2

Sung, B. H., Ketova, T., Hoshino, D., Zijlstra, A. & Weaver, A. M. Directional cell movement through tissues is controlled by exosome secretion. Nat. Commun. 6, 7164 (2015).

pubmed: 25968605 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8164

Jehanno, C., Vulin, M., Richina, V., Richina, F. & Bentires-Alj, M. Phenotypic plasticity during metastatic colonization. Trends Cell Biol. 32, 854–867 (2022).

pubmed: 35484037 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.03.007

Massagué, J. & Obenauf, A. C. Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature 529, 298–306 (2016).

pubmed: 26791720 pmcid: 5029466 doi: 10.1038/nature17038

Gassmann, P., Hemping-Bovenkerk, A., Mees, S. T. & Haier, J. Metastatic tumor cell arrest in the liver–lumen occlusion and specific adhesion are not exclusive. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 24, 851–858 (2009).

pubmed: 19319542 doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0694-2

Schlesinger, M. & Bendas, G. Contribution of very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) integrin to cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 34, 575–591 (2015).

pubmed: 25564456 doi: 10.1007/s10555-014-9545-x

Follain, G. et al. Hemodynamic forces tune the arrest, adhesion, and extravasation of circulating tumor cells. Dev. Cell 45, 33–52.e12 (2018).

pubmed: 29634935 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.02.015

Osmani, N. et al. Metastatic tumor cells exploit their adhesion repertoire to counteract shear forces during intravascular arrest. Cell Rep. 28, 2491–2500.e5 (2019). This study establishes a step-wise mechanism of circulating tumour cell attachment to the endothelium and extravasation, whereby, during early arrest, weaker adhesion is mediated by CD44 and αvβ3 integrin, and adhesion strengthening and stabilization is mediated by α5β1 integrin adhesion to luminally deposited fibronectin on endothelial cells.

pubmed: 31484062 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.102

Paul, C. D. et al. Tissue architectural cues drive organ targeting of tumor cells in zebrafish. Cell Syst. 9, 187–206.e16 (2019).

pubmed: 31445892 pmcid: 8276582 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.07.005

Ward, J. & Martin, P. Live-imaging studies reveal how microclots and the associated inflammatory response enhance cancer cell extravasation. J. Cell Sci. 136, jcs261225 (2023).

pubmed: 37671502 pmcid: 10561694 doi: 10.1242/jcs.261225

Kienast, Y. et al. Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation. Nat. Med. 16, 116–122 (2010).

pubmed: 20023634 doi: 10.1038/nm.2072

Garcia-Leon, M. J. et al. Platelets favor the outgrowth of established metastases. Nat. Commun. 15, 3297 (2024).

pubmed: 38740748 pmcid: 11091169 doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47516-w

Yoneda, T., Williams, P. J., Hiraga, T., Niewolna, M. & Nishimura, R. A bone-seeking clone exhibits different biological properties from the MDA-MB-231 parental human breast cancer cells and a brain-seeking clone in vivo and in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16, 1486–1495 (2001).

pubmed: 11499871 doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.8.1486

Carbonell, W. S., Ansorge, O., Sibson, N. & Muschel, R. The vascular basement membrane as “soil” in brain metastasis. PLoS One 4, e5857 (2009).

pubmed: 19516901 pmcid: 2689678 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005857

Zhang, L. et al. EZH2 engages TGFβ signaling to promote breast cancer bone metastasis via integrin β1-FAK activation. Nat. Commun. 13, 2543 (2022). This work establishes a feedforward loop of the EZH2–β1 integrin–FAK axis cooperating with the TGFβ signalling pathway to promote bone metastasis of breast cancer.

pubmed: 35538070 pmcid: 9091212 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30105-0

Li, X. Q., Zhang, R., Lu, H., Yue, X. M. & Huang, Y. F. Extracellular vesicle-packaged CDH11 and ITGA5 induce the premetastatic niche for bone colonization of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 82, 1560–1574 (2022).

pubmed: 35149589 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1331

Lau, D. et al. Role of c-Met/β1 integrin complex in the metastatic cascade in breast cancer. JCI Insight 6, e138928 (2021).

pubmed: 34003803 pmcid: 8262466 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.138928

Pantano, F. et al. Integrin ɑ5 in human breast cancer is a mediator of bone metastasis and a therapeutic target for the treatment of osteolytic lesions. Oncogene 40, 1284–1299 (2021).

pubmed: 33420367 pmcid: 7892344 doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01603-6

Huang, Y.-L. L. et al. Collagen-rich omentum is a premetastatic niche for integrin α2-mediated peritoneal metastasis. eLife 9, 1–34 (2020).

doi: 10.7554/eLife.59442

Miyamoto, S. et al. Integrin α5 mediates cancer cell-fibroblast adhesion and peritoneal dissemination of diffuse-type gastric carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 526, 335–345 (2022).

pubmed: 34775002 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.11.008

Howe, E. N. et al. Rab11b-mediated integrin recycling promotes brain metastatic adaptation and outgrowth. Nat. Commun. 11, 3017 (2020).

pubmed: 32541798 pmcid: 7295786 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16832-2

Hoshino, A. et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature 527, 329–335 (2015).

pubmed: 26524530 pmcid: 4788391 doi: 10.1038/nature15756

Pang, X. et al. Targeting integrin pathways: mechanisms and advances in therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 1 (2023).

pubmed: 36588107 pmcid: 9805914 doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01259-6

Slack, R. J., Macdonald, S. J. F. F., Roper, J. A., Jenkins, R. G. & Hatley, R. J. D. D. Emerging therapeutic opportunities for integrin inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 21, 60–78 (2022).

pubmed: 34535788 doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00284-4

Orré, T. et al. Molecular motion and tridimensional nanoscale localization of kindlin control integrin activation in focal adhesions. Nat. Commun. 12, 3104 (2021).

pubmed: 34035280 pmcid: 8149821 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23372-w

Hoffmann, J.-E. et al. Symmetric exchange of multi-protein building blocks between stationary focal adhesions and the cytosol. eLife 3, e02257 (2014).

pubmed: 24894463 pmcid: 4040925 doi: 10.7554/eLife.02257

Shi, M. et al. Latent TGF-β structure and activation. Nature 474, 343–349 (2011).

pubmed: 21677751 pmcid: 4717672 doi: 10.1038/nature10152

Mu, D. et al. The integrin αvβ8 mediates epithelial homeostasis through MT1-MMP-dependent activation of TGF-β1. J. Cell Biol. 157, 493–507 (2002).

pubmed: 11970960 pmcid: 2173277 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200109100

Dong, X. et al. Force interacts with macromolecular structure in activation of TGF-β. Nature 542, 55–59 (2017).

pubmed: 28117447 pmcid: 5586147 doi: 10.1038/nature21035

Magnussen, S. N. et al. Nephronectin promotes breast cancer brain metastatic colonization via its integrin-binding domains. Sci. Rep. 10, 12237 (2020).

pubmed: 32699247 pmcid: 7376038 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69242-1

Khalil, A. A. & de Rooij, J. Cadherin mechanotransduction in leader–follower cell specification during collective migration. Exp. Cell Res. 376, 86–91 (2019).

pubmed: 30633881 doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.01.006

Arjonen, A., Alanko, J., Veltel, S. & Ivaska, J. Distinct recycling of active and inactive β1 integrins. Traffic 13, 610–625 (2012).

pubmed: 22222055 pmcid: 3531618 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01327.x

Shafaq-Zadah, M. et al. Persistent cell migration and adhesion rely on retrograde transport of β1 integrin. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 54–64 (2016).

pubmed: 26641717 doi: 10.1038/ncb3287

Moreno-Layseca, P., Icha, J., Hamidi, H. & Ivaska, J. Integrin trafficking in cells and tissues. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 122–132 (2019).

pubmed: 30602723 pmcid: 6597357 doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0223-z

De Franceschi, N. et al. Selective integrin endocytosis is driven by interactions between the integrin α-chain and AP2. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 172–179 (2016).

pubmed: 26779610 pmcid: 5130146 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3161

Yu, C. et al. Integrin-β3 clusters recruit clathrin-mediated endocytic machinery in the absence of traction force. Nat. Commun. 6, 8672 (2015).

pubmed: 26507506 pmcid: 4846324 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9672

Teckchandani, A. et al. Quantitative proteomics identifies a Dab2/integrin module regulating cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 186, 99–111 (2009).

pubmed: 19581412 pmcid: 2712992 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200812160

Lakshminarayan, R. et al. Galectin-3 drives glycosphingolipid-dependent biogenesis of clathrin-independent carriers. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 592–603 (2014).

doi: 10.1038/ncb2970

Sabharanjak, S., Sharma, P., Parton, R. G. & Mayor, S. GPI-anchored proteins are delivered to recycling endosomes via a distinct cdc42-regulated, clathrin-independent pinocytic pathway. Dev. Cell 2, 411–423 (2002).

pubmed: 11970892 doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00145-4

Kumari, S. & Mayor, S. ARF1 is directly involved in dynamin-independent endocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 30–41 (2008).

pubmed: 18084285 doi: 10.1038/ncb1666

Nader, G. P. F., Ezratty, E. J. & Gundersen, G. G. FAK, talin and PIPKIγ regulate endocytosed integrin activation to polarize focal adhesion assembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 491–503 (2016).

pubmed: 27043085 doi: 10.1038/ncb3333

Barrow-McGee, R. et al. β1-Integrin–c-Met cooperation reveals an inside-in survival signalling on autophagy-related endomembranes. Nat. Commun. 7, 11942 (2016).

pubmed: 27336951 pmcid: 4931016 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11942

Bridgewater, R. E., Norman, J. C. & Caswell, P. T. Integrin trafficking at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 125, 3695–3701 (2012).

pubmed: 23027580 pmcid: 3462077 doi: 10.1242/jcs.095810

Rainero, E. et al. Diacylglycerol kinase α controls RCP-dependent integrin trafficking to promote invasive migration. J. Cell Biol. 196, 277–295 (2012).

pubmed: 22270919 pmcid: 3265946 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201109112

Jacquemet, G. et al. RCP-driven α5β1 recycling suppresses Rac and promotes RhoA activity via the RacGAP1–IQGAP1 complex. J. Cell Biol. 202, 917–935 (2013).

pubmed: 24019536 pmcid: 3776348 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201302041

Muller, P. A. J. et al. Mutant p53 drives invasion by promoting integrin recycling. Cell 139, 1327–1341 (2009).

pubmed: 20064378 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.026

Caswell, P. T. et al. Rab25 associates with α5β1 integrin to promote invasive migration in 3D microenvironments. Dev. Cell 13, 496–510 (2007).

pubmed: 17925226 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.012

Böttcher, R. T. et al. Sorting nexin 17 prevents lysosomal degradation of β1 integrins by binding to the β1-integrin tail. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 584–592 (2012).

pubmed: 22561348 doi: 10.1038/ncb2501

McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017).

pubmed: 28892079 pmcid: 5790113 doi: 10.1038/ncb3610

Sahgal, P. et al. GGA2 and RAB13 promote activity-dependent β1-integrin recycling. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs233387 (2019).

pubmed: 31076515 doi: 10.1242/jcs.233387

Dozynkiewicz, M. A. et al. Rab25 and CLIC3 collaborate to promote integrin recycling from late endosomes/lysosomes and drive cancer progression. Dev. Cell 22, 131–145 (2012).

pubmed: 22197222 pmcid: 3507630 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.008

Wickstrom, S. A., Radovanac, K. & Fassler, R. Genetic analyses of integrin signaling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a005116 (2011).

pubmed: 21421914 pmcid: 3039529 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005116

Walma, D. A. C. & Yamada, K. M. The extracellular matrix in development. Development 147, dev175596 (2020).

pubmed: 32467294 pmcid: 7272360 doi: 10.1242/dev.175596

Leonard, C. E. & Taneyhill, L. A. The road best traveled: neural crest migration upon the extracellular matrix. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 100, 177–185 (2020).

pubmed: 31727473 doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.10.013

McKeown, S. J., Wallace, A. S. & Anderson, R. B. Expression and function of cell adhesion molecules during neural crest migration. Dev. Biol. 373, 244–257 (2013).

pubmed: 23123967 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.10.028

Mittal, A., Pulina, M., Hou, S.-Y. & Astrof, S. Fibronectin and integrin α5 play essential roles in the development of the cardiac neural crest. Mech. Dev. 127, 472–484 (2010).

pubmed: 20807571 pmcid: 3233353 doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2010.08.005

Ma, S. et al. Developmentally regulated expression of integrin α6 distinguishes neural crest derivatives in the skin. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 1140554 (2023).

pubmed: 37255601 pmcid: 10225710 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1140554

Thomas, R., Menon, V., Mani, R. & Pruszak, J. Glycan epitope and integrin expression dynamics characterize neural crest epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 18, 2952–2965 (2022).

pubmed: 35727432 pmcid: 9622562 doi: 10.1007/s12015-022-10393-1

Li, X. et al. Integrin αvβ3 mediates K1735 murine melanoma cell motility in vivo and in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 114, 2665–2672 (2001).

pubmed: 11683393 doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.14.2665

Hsu, M.-Y. et al. Adenoviral gene transfer of β3 integrin subunit induces conversion from radial to vertical growth phase in primary human melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. 153, 1435–1442 (1998).

pubmed: 9811334 pmcid: 1853416 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65730-6

Shaw, T. J. & Martin, P. Wound repair: a showcase for cell plasticity and migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 42, 29–37 (2016).

pubmed: 27085790 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.04.001

Watt, F. M. New EMBO Member’s Review: role of integrins in regulating epidermal adhesion, growth and differentiation. EMBO J. 21, 3919–3926 (2002).

pubmed: 12145193 pmcid: 126145 doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf399

Juhasz, I., Murphy, G. F., Yan, H. C., Herlyn, M. & Albelda, S. M. Regulation of extracellular matrix proteins and integrin cell substratum adhesion receptors on epithelium during cutaneous human wound healing in vivo. Am. J. Pathol. 143, 1458–1469 (1993).

pubmed: 7694470 pmcid: 1887182

Koivisto, L., Heino, J., Häkkinen, L. & Larjava, H. Integrins in wound healing. Adv. Wound Care 3, 762–783 (2014).

doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0436

Geuijen, C. A. W. & Sonnenberg, A. Dynamics of the α6β4 integrin in keratinocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3845–3858 (2002).

pubmed: 12429829 pmcid: 133597 doi: 10.1091/mbc.02-01-0601

Nakayama, Y. et al. Blockade of interaction of α9 integrin with its ligands hinders the formation of granulation in cutaneous wound healing. Lab. Invest. 90, 881–894 (2010).

pubmed: 20308983 doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.69

Frisch, S. & Francis, H. Disruption of epithelial cell–matrix interactions induces apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 124, 619–626 (1994).

pubmed: 8106557 doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.4.619

Vachon, P. H. Integrin signaling, cell survival, and anoikis: distinctions, differences, and differentiation. J. Signal. Transduct. 2011, 1–18 (2011).

doi: 10.1155/2011/738137

Stupack, D. G., Puente, X. S., Boutsaboualoy, S., Storgard, C. M. & Cheresh, D. A. Apoptosis of adherent cells by recruitment of caspase-8 to unligated integrins. J. Cell Biol. 155, 459–470 (2001).

pubmed: 11684710 pmcid: 2150834 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200106070

Frisch, S. M. et al. Control of adhesion-dependent cell survival by focal adhesion kinase. J. Cell Biol. 134, 793–799 (1996).

pubmed: 8707856 doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.3.793

Frisch, S. M. & Screaton, R. A. Anoikis mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 555–562 (2001).

pubmed: 11544023 doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00251-9

Garnett, H. M. A scanning electron microscope study of the sequential changes in morphology occuring in human fibroblasts placed in suspension culture. Cytobios 27, 7–18 (1980).

pubmed: 7418447

Bridges, A. A., Jentzsch, M. S., Oakes, P. W., Occhipinti, P. & Gladfelter, A. S. Micron-scale plasma membrane curvature is recognized by the septin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 213, 23–32 (2016).

pubmed: 27044896 pmcid: 4828694 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201512029

Weems, A. D. et al. Blebs promote cell survival by assembling oncogenic signalling hubs. Nature 615, 517–525 (2023).

pubmed: 36859545 pmcid: 10881276 doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05758-6

Zimmermann, K. C., Bonzon, C. & Green, D. R. The machinery of programmed cell death. Pharmacol. Ther. 92, 57–70 (2001).

pubmed: 11750036 doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(01)00159-0

Ward, K. K. et al. Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity prevents anchorage-independent ovarian carcinoma cell growth and tumor progression. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 30, 579–594 (2013).

pubmed: 23275034 doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9562-5

Demers, M.-J. et al. Intestinal epithelial cancer cell anoikis resistance: EGFR-mediated sustained activation of Src overrides Fak-dependent signaling to MEK/Erk and/or PI3-K/Akt-1. J. Cell. Biochem. 107, 639–654 (2009).

pubmed: 19479902 doi: 10.1002/jcb.22131

Bertotti, A., Comoglio, P. M. & Trusolino, L. β4 integrin activates a Shp2–Src signaling pathway that sustains HGF-induced anchorage-independent growth. J. Cell Biol. 175, 993–1003 (2006).

pubmed: 17158954 pmcid: 2064708 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200605114

George, S., Martin, J. A. J., Graziani, V. & Sanz-Moreno, V. Amoeboid migration in health and disease: immune responses versus cancer dissemination. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 1091801 (2023).

pubmed: 36699013 pmcid: 9869768 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1091801

Seguin, L. et al. Galectin-3, a druggable vulnerability for KRAS-addicted cancers. Cancer Discov. 7, 1464–1479 (2017).

pubmed: 28893801 pmcid: 5718959 doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0539

Ubellacker, J. M. et al. Lymph protects metastasizing melanoma cells from ferroptosis. Nature 585, 113–118 (2020).

pubmed: 32814895 pmcid: 7484468 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2623-z

The role and regulation of integrins in cell migration and invasion.

Journal

Informations de publication

Résumé

Identifiants

Types de publication

Langues

Sous-ensembles de citation

Informations de copyright

Références

Auteurs

Megan R Chastney (MR)

Jasmin Kaivola (J)

Veli-Matti Leppänen (VM)

Johanna Ivaska (J)

Classifications MeSH