Successful cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer: A case report.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor Case report Cetuximab Metastatic colorectal cancer RAS mutation RAS wild type Rechallenge

Journal

World journal of clinical oncology
ISSN: 2218-4333
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101549149

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 04 03 2024
revised: 22 07 2024
accepted: 15 08 2024
medline: 1 10 2024
pubmed: 1 10 2024
entrez: 1 10 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment has been evolving and increasingly driven by tumor biology and gene expression analysis. Rechallenge with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (anti-EGFR) represents a promising strategy for patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-wt) mCRC and circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a potential selection strategy. Herein, we report the case of a RAS-wt mCRC patient who had a successful response to cetuximab rechallenge. Our patient was diagnosed with stage IV RAS-wt, microsatellite-stable rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma. He was started on first-line treatment with FOLFIRI and cetuximab and achieved partial response, allowing for a left hepatectomy (R0), followed by post-operative chemotherapy and an anterior resection; progression-free survival (PFS) of 16 months was obtained. Due to hepatic and nodal relapse, second-line treatment with FOLFOX and bevacizumab was started with partial response; metastasectomy was performed (R0), achieving a PFS of 11 months. After a 15 months anti-EGFR-free interval, FOLFIRI and cetuximab were reintroduced upon disease progression, again with partial response and a PFS of 16 months. Following extensive hepatic relapse, cetuximab was reintroduced and a marked clinical and analytical improvement was seen, after only one cycle. RAS-wt status was confirmed on circulating tumor DNA. The patient's overall survival exceeded 5 years. Our case provides real-world data to support cetuximab rechallenge in later lines of RAS-wt mCRC treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment has been evolving and increasingly driven by tumor biology and gene expression analysis. Rechallenge with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (anti-EGFR) represents a promising strategy for patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-wt) mCRC and circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a potential selection strategy. Herein, we report the case of a RAS-wt mCRC patient who had a successful response to cetuximab rechallenge.
CASE SUMMARY METHODS
Our patient was diagnosed with stage IV RAS-wt, microsatellite-stable rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma. He was started on first-line treatment with FOLFIRI and cetuximab and achieved partial response, allowing for a left hepatectomy (R0), followed by post-operative chemotherapy and an anterior resection; progression-free survival (PFS) of 16 months was obtained. Due to hepatic and nodal relapse, second-line treatment with FOLFOX and bevacizumab was started with partial response; metastasectomy was performed (R0), achieving a PFS of 11 months. After a 15 months anti-EGFR-free interval, FOLFIRI and cetuximab were reintroduced upon disease progression, again with partial response and a PFS of 16 months. Following extensive hepatic relapse, cetuximab was reintroduced and a marked clinical and analytical improvement was seen, after only one cycle. RAS-wt status was confirmed on circulating tumor DNA. The patient's overall survival exceeded 5 years.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our case provides real-world data to support cetuximab rechallenge in later lines of RAS-wt mCRC treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39351455
doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1232
pmc: PMC11438852
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1232-1238

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Auteurs

Alexandra Guedes (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia 4434-502, Portugal. alexandra.pereira.guedes@ulsge.min-saude.pt.

Sandra Silva (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia 4434-502, Portugal.

Sandra Custódio (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia 4434-502, Portugal.

Andreia Capela (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia 4434-502, Portugal.

Classifications MeSH