Effects of modifying hinotori™ surgical robot system on perioperative outcome of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
hinotori™ surgical robot system
modification
robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
Journal
International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association
ISSN: 1442-2042
Titre abrégé: Int J Urol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9440237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
17
07
2024
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
1
10
2024
pubmed:
1
10
2024
entrez:
1
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
One of the main advantages of the hinotori™ surgical robot system (HSRS) is that it can be easily adjusted. This study aimed to clarify the effects of modifying the HSRS on the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Overall, 158 cases of RARP using the HSRS were classified into three groups based on the modification to the system: group A (no modification, 70 cases), group B (addition of the ability to switch between two types of scopes and to adjust the arm base tilt back and forth, left and right, 42 cases), and group C (reduction of arm floating sensation, mitigation of emergency stop during arm collision, and addition of clutch function via hand switch in addition to foot pedal, 46 cases). The perioperative outcomes of each group were compared. The median of operation time, cockpit time, and cockpit time excluding the time required for lymph node dissection of group C were 223, 146, and 135 min, respectively, where are significantly shorter than those of group A (308, 228, and 208 min, p < 0.0001, respectively) and group B (319, 241, and 214 min, p < 0.0001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the rate of positive margin rates and the pad-free rate before the first follow-up visit among these three groups. The complication rates in groups A, B, and C were 11.4%, 9.4%, and 8.4% (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II), and 4.3%, 2.4%, and 0% (grade III), respectively. The modifications to the HSRS have enabled smoother surgical procedures for RARP.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Japanese Urological Association.
Références
Hinata N, Yamaguchi R, Kusuhara Y, Kanayama H, Kohjimoto Y, Hara I, et al. Hinotori surgical robot system, a novel robot‐assisted surgical platform: preclinical and clinical evaluation. Int J Urol. 2022;29:1213–1220.
Miyake H, Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, et al. Initial experience of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy using hinotori surgical robot system: single institutional prospective assessment of perioperative outcomes in 30 cases. J Endourol. 2023;37:531–534.
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Fujisawa M, et al. Robot‐assisted radical nephrectomy using novel surgical robot platform, hinotori: report of initial series of 13 cases. Int J Urol. 2023;30:1175–1179.
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Fujisawa M, et al. Robot‐assisted adrenalectomy using a hinotori surgical robot system: report of first series of six cases. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023;16:489–495.
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Fujisawa M, et al. Robot‐assisted radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract tumor: initial experience with the use of novel surgical robot system, hinotori. Transl Cancer Res. 2023;12:3522–3529.
Hayashi T, Kitano H, Hieda K, Hinata N. First case report of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion using the hinotori surgical robot system. Transl Cancer Res. 2024;13:471–479.
Hinata N, Murakami G, Miyake H, Tanaka K, Abe S, Fujimiya M, et al. Urethral sphincter fatigue after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: descriptive questionnaire‐based study and anatomic basis. Urology. 2014;84:144–148.
Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot‐assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti urology institute experience. Urology. 2002;60:864–868.
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76:340–351.
Miyake H, Fujisawa M. Early experience and future prospects regarding use of newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, in the field of urologic cancer surgery. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024;29:640–646.
Kohjimoto Y, Yamashita S, Iwagami S, Muraoka S, Wakamiya T, Hara I. hinotori™ vs. da Vinci(TM): propensity score‐matched analysis of surgical outcomes of robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg. 2024;18:130.
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Fujisawa M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy using hinotori versus da Vinci surgical robot system: a propensity score‐matched analysis. J Robot Surg. 2023;17:2435–2440.
Nakayama A, Izumi K, Ikezoe E, Inoue M, Tsujioka H, Nirazuka A, et al. Robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy using the novel hinotori(TM) surgical robot system: initial experience and operation learning curve at a single institution. Transl Cancer Res. 2024;13:57–64.
Guidelines for robotic assisted surgery in the field of urology. https://www.jsee.jp/davinci/guideline/
Watanabe K, Otsuka A, Sano A, Sato R, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, et al. Predictive factors of de novo overactive bladder in clinically localized prostate cancer patients after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2023;30:57–61.
Ito T, Watanabe K, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Motoyama D, et al. Impact of bladder neck angle measured by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging on midterm recovery of urinary continence in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2021;35:1610–1615.
Gumus E, Boylu U, Turan T, Onol FF. The learning curve of robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:1633–1637.
Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Gong EM, Mikhail AA, Gofrit ON, Zagaja GP, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship‐trained laparoscopic surgeon. J Endourol. 2007;21:441–447.
Hashimoto T, Yoshioka K, Gondo T, Kamoda N, Satake N, Ozu C, et al. Learning curve and perioperative outcomes of robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy in 200 initial Japanese cases by a single surgeon. J Endourol. 2013;27:1218–1223.
Rose KM, Navaratnam AK, Abdul‐Muhsin HM, Faraj KS, Eversman SA, Moss AA, et al. Robot assisted surgery of the vena cava: perioperative outcomes, technique, and lessons learned at the Mayo Clinic. J Endourol. 2019;33:1009–1016.
Motoyama D, Ito T, Sugiyama T, Otsuka A, Miyake H. Robot‐assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: initial experience in Japan. IJU Case Rep. 2022;5:145–148.
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Fujisawa M, et al. Robot‐assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using the novel surgical robot platform, hinotori: initial experience with two cases. IJU Case Rep. 2023;7:96–99.