Clinical utility of bedside Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of pneumonia in elderly patients: Comparison with clinical, -radiological and ultrasound diagnosis.


Journal

Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine
ISSN: 1828-695X
Titre abrégé: Multidiscip Respir Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101477642

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 15 03 2024
accepted: 01 07 2024
medline: 1 10 2024
pubmed: 1 10 2024
entrez: 1 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

to measure the clinical impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of -community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), compared to clinical, radiological and ultrasound diagnosis. 84 patients (47/37 males/females, mean age:78,57±11,7 Y) with clinical suspicion of pneumonia and with ultrasound findings of peripheral lung lesions, were investigated with CEUS for a better characterization. Final diagnosis of 65 cap was obtained with complete disappearance of symptoms and pulmonary nodule(s); 19 neoplasms: 16 patients performed histologically with bronchoscopy; 3 refused (non-invasive diagnosis with basal CT-scan and positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)). Sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy (ODA) (and corresponding AUROC) of clinical-data (CD), chest X-ray(CXR), Lung-ultrasound(LUS), CEUS were calculated with SPSS 26.0 software. Final diagnosis: 65 CAP, and 19 chest cancers. 9/65 (13%) patients died, of these 7/9 with older age and heart disease as comorbidity. CD: True-Positive (TP):23, True-negative (TN): 17; False-Positive (FP):2; False-negative (FN):42 (sens:35,4% spec:89,5% ODA10%: PPV:92%, NPV:28,8%) (AUROC±SEauc:0,46±0,076); CXR: TP: 36, TN:14; FP:5, FN:29; (sens: 55,4%; spec: 73,7%; ODA: 32%; PPV:87,5%, NPV:32,66%) (AUROC±SEauc:0,645±0,068). US: TP:59; TN: 14; FP:5, FN:6 (sens: 90,8%, spec: 73,7%, ODA: 84,9%, PPV:92,2%, NPV:70%) (AUROC±SEauc:0,9417±0,024); CEUS: TP: 63; TN: 19; FP:0; FN:2 (sens: 96,9%; spec: 100% ODA: 97,5%; PPV: 100%, NPV:90,5%) (AUROC±SEauc:0,98±0,01). Clinical-data and chest X-RAYS are insufficient to obtain a correct diagnosis of CAP in elderly population; US demonstrated a good accuracy to establish CAP, but with a relatively low specificity; in these cases, CEUS is able to give a correct characterization, allowing you to save the need for a chest contrast-enhanced-CT (CECT).

Identifiants

pubmed: 39352218
doi: 10.5826/mrm.2024.967
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Francesco Giangregorio (F)

Internal Medicine Department, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Emilio Mosconi (E)

Internal Medicine Department, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Maria Grazia Debellis (MG)

Internal Medicine Department, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Stella Provini (S)

Internal Medicine Department, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Ciro Esposito (C)

Internal Medicine Department, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Manuela Mendozza (M)

Internal Medicine Department, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Rita Raccanelli (R)

Cardiac and Pneumological Rehabilitation Medicine, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Luigi Maresca (L)

Cardiac and Pneumological Rehabilitation Medicine, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Sara Cinquini (S)

Cardiac and Pneumological Rehabilitation Medicine, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Francesco Tursi (F)

Cardiac and Pneumological Rehabilitation Medicine, Codogno Hospital, Lodi, Italy.

Classifications MeSH