Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Findings and Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction During Pregnancy.

Anal incontinence Constipation Gestation Pelvic organ prolapse Transperineal ultrasound Urinary incontinence

Journal

International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 05 06 2024
accepted: 18 08 2024
medline: 1 10 2024
pubmed: 1 10 2024
entrez: 1 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pregnancy and childbirth predispose to pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), coinciding with functional and anatomical changes in the pelvic floor. To some extent, these can be assessed by transperineal ultrasound (TPUS), yet the correlation between ultrasound findings and symptoms has not been well elucidated. We hypothesised that pregnant women with PFD would show different findings at TPUS. This is a planned secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Pregnant women were asked to fill out standardised questionnaires on PFD and undergo TPUS at 12-14 weeks and 28-32 weeks of gestation. We compared bladder neck descent, urethral rotation, retrovesical angle, pelvic organ descent, genital hiatus dimensions and the presence of anal sphincter defects between women with and those without PFD using t test and Fisher's exact test. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the correlation between TPUS findings and PFD severity. As this is a secondary subgroup analysis of participants who underwent TPUS, no sample size was determined upfront. At Valsalva, women with urinary incontinence had more pronounced bladder neck descent (p = 0.02) and urethral rotation (p < 0.01), as well as wider retrovesical angles (p = 0.04) and larger genital hiatus areas (p < 0.01). After controlling for age, BMI and parity, the retrovesical angle was the only persistent predictor of urinary incontinence. No correlation was observed between any TPUS marker and symptoms of either prolapse or anorectal dysfunction. In pregnant women, symptoms of urinary incontinence, but not of prolapse and anorectal dysfunction, are associated with differences in pelvic floor anatomy at TPUS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39352426
doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05931-z
pii: 10.1007/s00192-024-05931-z
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The International Urogynecological Association.

Références

Peinado-Molina RA, Hernández-Martínez A, Martínez-Vázquez S, Rodríguez-Almagro J, Martínez-Galiano JM. Pelvic floor dysfunction: prevalence and associated factors. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):2005.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16901-3 pubmed: 37838661 pmcid: 10576367
DeLancey JOL, Kane Low L, Miller JM, Patel DA, Tumbarello JA. Graphic integration of causal factors of pelvic floor disorders: an integrated life span model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):610.e1–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.001 pubmed: 18533115
Doumouchtsis SK, de Tayrac R, Lee J, Daly O, Melendez-Munoz J, Lindo FM, et al. An International Continence Society (ICS)/ International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;34(1):1–42.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05397-x pubmed: 36443462 pmcid: 9834366
Oliphant SS, Nygaard IE, Zong W, Canavan TP, Moalli PA. Maternal adaptations in preparation for parturition predict uncomplicated spontaneous delivery outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(6):630.e1–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.021 pubmed: 24931474
Alperin M, Lawley DM, Esparza MC, Lieber RL. Pregnancy-induced adaptations in the intrinsic structure of rat pelvic floor muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(2):191.e1–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.012 pubmed: 25979618
AIUM/IUGA practice parameter for the performance of urogynecological ultrasound examinations. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(9):1389–400.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03954-5
Cattani L, Van Schoubroeck D, De Bruyn C, Ghesquière S, Deprest J. Body image and pelvic floor dysfunction in pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective one-year follow-up cohort study. BJOG. 2024;131(10):1420–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17820 .
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17820 pubmed: 38628037
Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322–30.
doi: 10.1002/nau.20041 pubmed: 15227649
Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44(1):77–80.
doi: 10.1136/gut.44.1.77 pubmed: 9862829 pmcid: 1760067
Frank L, Kleinman L, Farup C, Taylor L, Miner P Jr. Psychometric validation of a constipation symptom assessment questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34(9):870–7.
doi: 10.1080/003655299750025327 pubmed: 10522604
Utomo E, Blok BF, Steensma AB, Korfage IJ. Validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) in a Dutch population. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):531–44.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2263-z pubmed: 24445668
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20.
doi: 10.1002/nau.20798 pubmed: 19941278
Sultan AH, Monga A, Lee J, Emmanuel A, Norton C, Santoro G, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):5–31.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3140-3 pubmed: 27774569
Drossman DA, Chang L, Chey WD, Kellow J, Tack J, Whitehead WE. Rome IV diagnostic criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders, 2016. Available from: https://theromefoundation.org/rome-iv/rome-iv-criteria/ . Accessed 20 Feb 2023.
Guzman Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Defect-specific rectocele repair: medium-term anatomical, functional and subjective outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(5):487–92.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.12347 pubmed: 26172410
Örnö AK, Dietz HP. Levator co-activation is a significant confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva maneuver. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(3):346–50.
doi: 10.1002/uog.4082 pubmed: 17702054
Little RJ, Raghunathan T. On summary measures analysis of the linear mixed effects model for repeated measures when data are not missing completely at random. Stat Med. 1999;18(17–18):2465–78.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990915/30)18:17/18<2465::AID-SIM269>3.0.CO;2-2 pubmed: 10474153
Dietz HP, Clarke B, Herbison P. Bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure as predictors of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2002;13(5):289–93.
doi: 10.1007/s001920200063
Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound in incontinence: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(9):1085–97.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1402-7 pubmed: 21512829
Van Veelen GA, Schweitzer KJ, van der Vaart CH. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: changes in anatomy during and after first pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(4):476–80.
doi: 10.1002/uog.13301 pubmed: 24436146
Fritel X, Ringa V, Quiboeuf E, Fauconnier A. Female urinary incontinence, from pregnancy to menopause: a review of epidemiological and pathophysiological findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(8):901–10.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01419.x pubmed: 22497363
Alperin M, Kaddis T, Pichika R, Esparza MC, Lieber RL. Pregnancy-induced adaptations in intramuscular extracellular matrix of rat pelvic floor muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):210.e1–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.018 pubmed: 26875952
Van Veelen A, Schweitzer K, van der Vaart H. Ultrasound assessment of urethral support in women with stress urinary incontinence during and after first pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):249–56.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000355 pubmed: 25004336
Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O. Ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(6):688–91.
doi: 10.1002/uog.4024 pubmed: 17471449
Shek KL, Dietz HP. What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1783–7.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2792-8 pubmed: 26174659
Lakovschek IC, Trutnovsky G, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Gold D. Longitudinal study of pelvic floor characteristics before, during, and after pregnancy in nulliparous women. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(1):147–55.
doi: 10.1002/jum.15689 pubmed: 33682186
Shin GH, Toto EL, Schey R. Pregnancy and postpartum bowel changes: constipation and fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(4):521–9.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.76 pubmed: 25803402
Cullen G, O’Donoghue D. Constipation and pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(5):807–18.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.05.005 pubmed: 17889809
Van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de Pol G, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. Defecatory symptoms during and after the first pregnancy: prevalences and associated factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(3):224–30.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1351-0 pubmed: 16077997
Ferdinande K, Dorreman Y, Roelens K, Ceelen W, De Looze D. Anorectal symptoms during pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(12):1109–16.
doi: 10.1111/codi.14324 pubmed: 29972721
Souza AI, Batista Filho M, Bresani CC, Ferreira LO, Figueiroa JN. Adherence and side effects of three ferrous sulfate treatment regimens on anemic pregnant women in clinical trials. Cad Saude Publica. 2009;25(6):1225–33.
doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2009000600005 pubmed: 19503953
Shi W, Xu X, Zhang Y, Guo S, Wang J, Wang J. Epidemiology and risk factors of functional constipation in pregnant women. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0133521.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133521 pubmed: 26208169 pmcid: 4514689

Auteurs

Laura Cattani (L)

Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.

Dominique Van Schoubroeck (D)

Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.

Adela Samešova (A)

Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Bram Packet (B)

Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.

Susanne Housmans (S)

Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.

Jan Deprest (J)

Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. Jan.deprest@uzleuven.be.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium. Jan.deprest@uzleuven.be.
Research Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK. Jan.deprest@uzleuven.be.

Classifications MeSH