Patient considerations of social media account management after death.
Advanced cancer
Palliative care
Social media management
Social media preferences
Journal
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
01
05
2024
accepted:
13
09
2024
medline:
1
10
2024
pubmed:
1
10
2024
entrez:
1
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Social media is widely used but few studies have examined how patients with advanced cancer want their accounts managed after death. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of our patients with advanced cancer who have discussed the post-mortem management of their social media accounts with their family or friends. This was a cross-sectional survey in which patients with advanced cancer at an outpatient Supportive Care Clinic at a tertiary cancer center completed a novel survey on social media use that assessed patients' social media use practices, attitudes and preferences, and reactions to the survey. Of 117 patients, 72 (61.5%) were women, and the mean age was 56.4 years old. We found that 24 (21%) of our patients have discussed their preferences for management of their social media accounts after death. Patients with a lower annual income were significantly more likely to report having such conversations (p = 0.0036). Completing the survey motivated 76 patients (67%) to discuss their social media accounts and 82 patients (71.3%) to explore how social media will be managed after their death. Half of our study participants reported social media as an important source of coping. Few patients have had conversations on the management of their accounts after death, although more were interested in exploring their options further. More research is needed to examine the role of social media as a digital legacy and a coping tool for patients with advanced cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39352567
doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08882-9
pii: 10.1007/s00520-024-08882-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
696Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Van De Belt TH et al (2010) Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 12(2):e18
Smith A, Anderson M (2018) Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/
Love B et al (2013) Work and “mass personal” communication as means of navigating nutrition and exercise concerns in an online cancer community. J Med Internet Res 15(5):e102
doi: 10.2196/jmir.2594
pubmed: 23728365
pmcid: 3785995
Taubert M et al (2014) Palliative social media. BMJ Support Palliat Care 4:13–18
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000584
pubmed: 24644766
Cho H et al (2018) Visual cancer communication on social media: an examination of content and effects of #Melanomasucks. J Med Internet Res 20(9):e10501
doi: 10.2196/10501
pubmed: 30185403
pmcid: 6231808
De Silva D et al (2018) Machine learning to support social media empowered patients in cancer care and cancer treatment decisions. PLoS ONE 13(10):e0205855
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205855
pubmed: 30335805
pmcid: 6193663
Ruckenstuhl P et al (2016) Like or dislike? Impact of Facebook on Ewing sarcoma treatment. JMIR Cancer 2(2):e11
doi: 10.2196/cancer.5367
pubmed: 28410188
pmcid: 5369625
Picanço L, Biancovilli P, Jurberg C (2018) Beyond the drama: the beautiful life in news feeds on cancer. J Cancer Educ 33(2):424–428
doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1094-2
pubmed: 27501961
Grimm CC (2014) Sonia Survey on the fate of digital footprints after death. Internet Society: NDSS Symposium
Bruera E et al (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7(2):6–9
doi: 10.1177/082585979100700202
pubmed: 1714502
Crawford JR, Henry JD (2004) The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 43(Pt 3):245–265
doi: 10.1348/0144665031752934
pubmed: 15333231
Doyle D, Brubaker J (2023) Digital legacy: a systematic literature review. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Inter 7:1–26
doi: 10.1145/3610059
Bender JL et al (2021) Internet and social media use in cancer patients: association with distress and perceived benefits and limitations. Support Care Cancer 29(9):5273–5281
doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06077-0
pubmed: 33651181
Wolfers LN, Utz S (2022) Social media use, stress, and coping. Curr Opin Psychol 45:101305
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101305
pubmed: 35184027
Norris J (2024) Digital legacy association. Available from: https://digitallegacyassociation.org/ . Accessed 28 July 2024
Stanley S et al (2023) A grounded theory study exploring palliative care healthcare professionals’ experiences of managing digital legacy as part of advance care planning for people receiving palliative care. Palliat Med 37(9):1424–1433
doi: 10.1177/02692163231194198
pubmed: 37609897
pmcid: 10566216
Bergenholtz H, Missel M, Timm H (2020) Talking about death and dying in a hospital setting - a qualitative study of the wishes for end-of-life conversations from the perspective of patients and spouses. BMC Palliat Care 19(1):168
doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00675-1
pubmed: 33138799
pmcid: 7607873