Phase I/II study of nivolumab plus lenvatinib for advanced biliary tract cancer (JCOG1808/NCCH1817, SNIPE).

biliary tract cancer biliary tract infection immune checkpoint inhibitor lenvatinib nivolumab

Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 04 04 2024
revised: 02 09 2024
accepted: 03 09 2024
medline: 3 10 2024
pubmed: 3 10 2024
entrez: 1 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Although cisplatin plus gemcitabine and other combinations have improved the survival of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), high unmet medical needs remain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus lenvatinib in the second-line treatment for advanced BTC. Nivolumab (240 mg) was administered biweekly. Phase I determined the recommended phase II dose of lenvatinib (20 mg or 14 mg). In phase II, the primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned sample size was 32 patients with a power of 80%, a one-sided alpha error of 5%, threshold ORR of 10%, and expected ORR of 30%. In phase I, the recommended dose of lenvatinib was determined to be 20 mg in six patients, with one dose-limiting toxicity (myocarditis). In phase II, we enrolled 26 patients. ORR, DCR, and median OS and PFS were 9.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 22.5%], 53.1% (95% CI 34.7% to 70.9%), and 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9-9.7 months) and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-4.1 months), respectively. No response was observed in patients with the usage of antibiotics. The grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (59.4%) and biliary tract infection (37.5%). Rash (28.1%) and hypothyroidism (21.9%) were observed as immune-mediated adverse events of any grade. Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety in advanced BTC, but its efficacy in the second-line treatment was limited.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although cisplatin plus gemcitabine and other combinations have improved the survival of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), high unmet medical needs remain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus lenvatinib in the second-line treatment for advanced BTC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
Nivolumab (240 mg) was administered biweekly. Phase I determined the recommended phase II dose of lenvatinib (20 mg or 14 mg). In phase II, the primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned sample size was 32 patients with a power of 80%, a one-sided alpha error of 5%, threshold ORR of 10%, and expected ORR of 30%.
RESULTS RESULTS
In phase I, the recommended dose of lenvatinib was determined to be 20 mg in six patients, with one dose-limiting toxicity (myocarditis). In phase II, we enrolled 26 patients. ORR, DCR, and median OS and PFS were 9.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 22.5%], 53.1% (95% CI 34.7% to 70.9%), and 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9-9.7 months) and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-4.1 months), respectively. No response was observed in patients with the usage of antibiotics. The grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (59.4%) and biliary tract infection (37.5%). Rash (28.1%) and hypothyroidism (21.9%) were observed as immune-mediated adverse events of any grade.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety in advanced BTC, but its efficacy in the second-line treatment was limited.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39353216
pii: S2059-7029(24)01689-2
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103919
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103919

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

M Ueno (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan. Electronic address: makoto23u@gmail.com.

C Morizane (C)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

M Ikeda (M)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

M Ozaka (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

F Nagashima (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

T Kataoka (T)

Multi-institutional Clinical Trials Section, Research Management Division, Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

J Mizusawa (J)

Biostatistics Section, Research Management Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

A Ohba (A)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

S Kobayashi (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.

H Imaoka (H)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

A Kasuga (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

N Okano (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Y Nagasaka (Y)

Data Management Section, Data Management Division, Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

M Sasaki (M)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

J Furuse (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.

T Okusaka (T)

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH