Characterization and Potential Relevance of Randomized Controlled Trial Patient Populations in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Journal
The journal of knee surgery
ISSN: 1938-2480
Titre abrégé: J Knee Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101137599
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
1
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies in revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) are essential to investigate the effectiveness of interventions. However, there has been limited research investigating how patient cohorts comprising rTJA RCT samples resemble the US patient population undergoing rTJA in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare the patient characteristics of rTJA RCT cohorts with the characteristics of national patient database cohorts. RCT studies for rTJA were aggregated. Patient demographics in this group were compared against HCUP NIS and ACS-NSQIP patient cohorts. Forty-six RCTs met inclusion criteria. There were 3,780 total patients across 46 RCTs. The average age of patients in the rTJA RCT cohort was 66.4 9.4 while the NIS cohort was 67.3 11.1 (d=0.08, effect size=small). The average BMI of the rTJA RCT cohort was 31.1 5.7 while the NSQIP cohort was 31.7 8.3 (d=0.08, effect size=small). For rTJA, effect sizes for age, BMI, sex, ethnicity, smoking, and diabetes were all small or very small. Overall, the rTJA RCT patient cohort does not differ significantly compared to the general patient population undergoing rTJA. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the rTJA RCT cohort and database cohorts were minimal to small, indicating that these differences are unlikely to impact clinical outcomes.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.