Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II): multicentre, outcome assessor-masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to Descemet stripping only (DSO) with adjunctive ripasudil for Fuchs dystrophy.
Humans
Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy
/ surgery
Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
/ methods
Visual Acuity
/ drug effects
Male
Sulfonamides
/ therapeutic use
Female
Isoquinolines
/ therapeutic use
Endothelium, Corneal
/ pathology
Descemet Membrane
/ surgery
Treatment Outcome
Middle Aged
Aged
Ophthalmic Solutions
/ therapeutic use
Multicenter Studies as Topic
clinical trial
cornea
Journal
BMJ open ophthalmology
ISSN: 2397-3269
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101714806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
26
03
2024
accepted:
03
09
2024
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
1
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It remains uncertain whether Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet stripping only (DSO) yields better outcomes in patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). This paper presents the protocol for the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II), a multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial comparing DMEK to DSO with ripasudil (DSO-R) for this patient population. A total of 60 patients with endothelial dysfunction due to symptomatic FECD will be enrolled from seven participating sites in the USA. The patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment groups: group 1-DMEK plus topical placebo and group 2-DSO plus topical ripasudil 0.4%. The enrolment period is 24 months. The primary outcome is best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include peripheral and central endothelial cell density, visual acuity, vision-related quality of life and Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography. Study outcomes will be analysed using mixed effects linear regression. Adverse events, including rebubble procedures, endothelial failure and graft rejection, will be documented and analysed using appropriate statistical methods. DETECT II aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of DMEK and DSO-R. The results of this trial will contribute to optimising the treatment of FECD, while also exploring the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and national/international meetings will facilitate knowledge translation and guide clinical practice in the field of corneal transplantation. A data and safety monitoring committee has been empanelled by the National Eye Institute. All study protocols will be subject to review and approval by WCG IRB as the single IRB of record. This study will comply with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Data from the trial will be made available on reasonable request. NCT05275972.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39353677
pii: bmjophth-2024-001725
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001725
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
K-115
0
Sulfonamides
0
Isoquinolines
0
Ophthalmic Solutions
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05275972']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical Trial Protocol
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.