Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II): multicentre, outcome assessor-masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to Descemet stripping only (DSO) with adjunctive ripasudil for Fuchs dystrophy.


Journal

BMJ open ophthalmology
ISSN: 2397-3269
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101714806

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 26 03 2024
accepted: 03 09 2024
medline: 3 10 2024
pubmed: 3 10 2024
entrez: 1 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

It remains uncertain whether Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet stripping only (DSO) yields better outcomes in patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). This paper presents the protocol for the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II), a multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial comparing DMEK to DSO with ripasudil (DSO-R) for this patient population. A total of 60 patients with endothelial dysfunction due to symptomatic FECD will be enrolled from seven participating sites in the USA. The patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment groups: group 1-DMEK plus topical placebo and group 2-DSO plus topical ripasudil 0.4%. The enrolment period is 24 months. The primary outcome is best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include peripheral and central endothelial cell density, visual acuity, vision-related quality of life and Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography. Study outcomes will be analysed using mixed effects linear regression. Adverse events, including rebubble procedures, endothelial failure and graft rejection, will be documented and analysed using appropriate statistical methods. DETECT II aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of DMEK and DSO-R. The results of this trial will contribute to optimising the treatment of FECD, while also exploring the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and national/international meetings will facilitate knowledge translation and guide clinical practice in the field of corneal transplantation. A data and safety monitoring committee has been empanelled by the National Eye Institute. All study protocols will be subject to review and approval by WCG IRB as the single IRB of record. This study will comply with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Data from the trial will be made available on reasonable request. NCT05275972.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39353677
pii: bmjophth-2024-001725
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001725
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

K-115 0
Sulfonamides 0
Isoquinolines 0
Ophthalmic Solutions 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05275972']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial Protocol Comparative Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Charles C Lin (CC)

Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Winston Chamberlain (W)

Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Beth Ann Benetz (BA)

Corneal Imaging Analysis Reading Center, Case Western Reserve University Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

William Gensheimer (W)

Section of Ophthalmology, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

Jennifer Y Li (JY)

Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.

Bennie H Jeng (BH)

Sheie Eye Institute at the University of Pennsylavia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Jameson Clover (J)

VisionGift, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Nicole Varnado (N)

Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Sarah Abdelrahman (S)

F.I. Proctor Foundation at the University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Amrita Srinivasan (A)

Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Zeba A Syed (ZA)

Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Ellen H Koo (EH)

Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, USA.

Benjamin F Arnold (BF)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.

Thomas M Lietman (TM)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.

Jonathan Lass (J)

Corneal Imaging Analysis Reading Center, Case Western Reserve University Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer (J)

Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA rosej@stanford.edu.
Francis I. Proctor Foundation, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH