The magic, memory, and curiosity fMRI dataset of people viewing magic tricks.
Journal
Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
16
08
2022
accepted:
23
07
2024
medline:
2
10
2024
pubmed:
2
10
2024
entrez:
1
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Videos of magic tricks offer lots of opportunities to study the human mind. They violate the expectations of the viewer, causing prediction errors, misdirect attention, and elicit epistemic emotions. Herein we describe and share the Magic, Memory, and Curiosity (MMC) Dataset where 50 participants watched 36 magic tricks filmed and edited specifically for functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) experiments. The MMC Dataset includes a contextual incentive manipulation, curiosity ratings for the magic tricks, and incidental memory performance tested a week later. We additionally measured individual differences in working memory and constructs relevant to motivated learning. fMRI data were acquired before, during, and after learning. We show that both behavioural and fMRI data are of high quality, as indicated by basic validation analysis, i.e., variance decomposition as well as intersubject correlation and seed-based functional connectivity, respectively. The richness and complexity of the MMC Dataset will allow researchers to explore dynamic cognitive and motivational processes from various angles during task and rest.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39353978
doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03675-5
pii: 10.1038/s41597-024-03675-5
doi:
Types de publication
Dataset
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1063Subventions
Organisme : Leverhulme Trust
ID : RL-2016-030
Organisme : Leverhulme Trust
ID : RL-2016-030
Organisme : Jacobs Foundation
ID : Research Fellowship
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kuhn, G., Amlani, A. A. & Rensink, R. A. Towards a science of magic. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 349–354 (2008).
pubmed: 18693130
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.008
Rensink, R. A. & Kuhn, G. A framework for using magic to study the mind. Front. Psychol. 5, 1508 (2014).
pubmed: 25698983
Kuhn, G., Tatler, B. W., Findlay, J. M. & Cole, G. G. Misdirection in magic: Implications for the relationship between eye gaze and attention. Vis. cogn. 16, 391–405 (2008).
doi: 10.1080/13506280701479750
Danek, A. H., Öllinger, M., Fraps, T., Grothe, B. & Flanagin, V. L. An fMRI investigation of expectation violation in magic tricks. Front. Psychol. 6, 84 (2015).
pubmed: 25699001
pmcid: 4316608
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00084
Parris, B. A., Kuhn, G., Mizon, G. A., Benattayallah, A. & Hodgson, T. L. Imaging the impossible: an fMRI study of impossible causal relationships in magic tricks. Neuroimage 45, 1033–1039 (2009).
pubmed: 19166943
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.036
Ozono, H. et al. Magic Curiosity Arousing Tricks (MagicCATs): A novel stimulus collection to induce epistemic emotions. Behav. Res. Methods 53, 188–215 (2021).
pubmed: 32651737
doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01431-2
Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M. & Singh, C. A. The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educ. Psychol. 53, 165–184 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465
Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R. & Sinatra, G. M. Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: the epistemically-related emotion scales. Cogn. Emot. 31, 1268–1276 (2017).
pubmed: 27448030
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989
Berlyne, D. E. Curiosity and exploration. Science 153, 25–33 (1966).
pubmed: 5328120
doi: 10.1126/science.153.3731.25
FitzGibbon, L., Lau, J. K. L. & Murayama, K. The seductive lure of curiosity: Information as a motivationally salient reward. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 35, 21–27 (2020).
Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P. Y., Lopes, M. & Baranes, A. Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 585–593 (2013).
pubmed: 24126129
pmcid: 4193662
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001
Kobayashi, K., Ravaioli, S., Baranès, A., Woodford, M. & Gottlieb, J. Diverse motives for human curiosity. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 587–595 (2019).
pubmed: 30988479
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0589-3
van Lieshout, L. L. F., Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Müller, N. C. J., Cools, R. & de Lange, F. P. Induction and relief of curiosity elicit parietal and frontal activity. J. Neurosci. 38, 2816–2817 (2018).
Gruber, M. J. & Ranganath, C. How curiosity enhances hippocampus-dependent memory: The prediction, appraisal, curiosity, and exploration (PACE) framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 1014–1025 (2019).
pubmed: 31706791
pmcid: 6891259
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.003
Gruber, M. J., Valji, A. & Ranganath, C. Curiosity and learning: A neuroscientific perspective. in The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning (eds. Renniger, K. A. & Hidi, S.) 397–417 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019).
Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D. & Ranganath, C. States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron 84, 486–496 (2014).
pubmed: 25284006
pmcid: 4252494
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060
Kang, M. J. et al. The wick in the candle of learning: epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychol. Sci. 20, 963–973 (2009).
pubmed: 19619181
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x
Lau, J. K. L., Ozono, H., Kuratomi, K., Komiya, A. & Murayama, K. Shared striatal activity in decisions to satisfy curiosity and hunger at the risk of electric shocks. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 531–543 (2020).
pubmed: 32231281
doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0848-3
Ligneul, R., Mermillod, M. & Morisseau, T. From relief to surprise: Dual control of epistemic curiosity in the human brain. Neuroimage 181, 490–500 (2018).
pubmed: 30025853
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.038
Murphy, C., Ranganath, C. & Gruber, M. J. Connectivity between the hippocampus and default mode network during the relief – but not elicitation – of curiosity supports curiosity-enhanced memory enhancements. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.453739 (2021).
Poh, J.-H. et al. Hippocampal convergence during anticipatory midbrain activation promotes subsequent memory formation. Nat Commun 13, 6729 (2022).
Murayama, K. A reward-learning framework of knowledge acquisition: An integrated account of curiosity, interest, and intrinsic-extrinsic rewards. Psychol. Rev. 129, 175–198 (2022).
pubmed: 35099213
doi: 10.1037/rev0000349
Murayama, K., FitzGibbon, L. & Sakaki, M. Process account of curiosity and interest: a reward-learning perspective. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 31, 875–895 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09499-9
Duan, H., Fernández, G., van Dongen, E. & Kohn, N. The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on memory formation: Insight from behavioral and imaging study. Brain Struct. Funct. 225, 1561–1574 (2020).
pubmed: 32350643
pmcid: 7286947
doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02074-x
DuPre, E., Hanke, M. & Poline, J.-B. Nature abhors a paywall: How open science can realize the potential of naturalistic stimuli. Neuroimage 216, 116330 (2020).
pubmed: 31704292
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116330
Sonkusare, S., Breakspear, M. & Guo, C. Naturalistic stimuli in neuroscience: Critically acclaimed. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 699–714 (2019).
pubmed: 31257145
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.004
Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G. & Malach, R. Intersubject synchronisation of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 303, 1634–1640 (2004).
pubmed: 15016991
doi: 10.1126/science.1089506
Nummenmaa, L., Lahnakoski, J. M. & Glerean, E. Sharing the social world via intersubject neural synchronisation. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 24, 7–14 (2018).
pubmed: 29550395
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.021
Finn, E. S. et al. Idiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging. Neuroimage 215, 116828 (2020).
pubmed: 32276065
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116828
Meliss, S., Tsuchiyagaito, A., Byrne, P., van Reekum, C. & Murayama, K. Broad brain networks support curiosity-motivated incidental learning of naturalistic dynamic stimuli with and without monetary incentives. Imaging Neuroscience 2, 1–27 (2024).
doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00134
Cowan, E. T., Schapiro, A. C., Dunsmoor, J. E. & Murty, V. P. Memory consolidation as an adaptive process. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 28, 1796–1810 (2021).
pubmed: 34327677
doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01978-x
Murayama, K. & Kuhbandner, C. Money enhances memory consolidation - but only for boring material. Cognition 119, 120–124 (2011).
pubmed: 21292249
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.001
Pajula, J. & Tohka, J. How many is enough? Effect of sample size in inter-subject correlation analysis of fMRI. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2016, 2094601 (2016).
pubmed: 26884746
pmcid: 4738700
doi: 10.1155/2016/2094601
Yeshurun, Y., Nguyen, M. & Hasson, U. Amplification of local changes along the timescale processing hierarchy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701652114 (2017).
Meliss, S. & Murayama, K. Differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards on recognition memory. Brain Cogn. 137, 103656 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.10.025
Nastase, S. A., Gazzola, V., Hasson, U. & Keysers, C. Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 14, 669–687 (2019).
Matell, M. S. & Jacoby, J. Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. J. Appl. Psychol. 56, 506–509 (1972).
doi: 10.1037/h0033601
Thomas, R. M., De Sanctis, T., Gazzola, V. & Keysers, C. Where and how our brain represents the temporal structure of observed action. Neuroimage 183, 677–697 (2018).
pubmed: 30165253
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.056
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2020).
Corsi, P. M. Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain [PhD thesis]. Montreal: McGill University, Montreal (1972).
Kessels, R. P., van Zandvoort, M. J., Postma, A., Kappelle, L. J. & de Haan, E. H. The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: standardization and normative data. Appl. Neuropsychol. 7, 252–258 (2000).
pubmed: 11296689
doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0704_8
Kirchner, W. K. Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J. Exp. Psychol. 55, 352–358 (1958).
pubmed: 13539317
doi: 10.1037/h0043688
Stoet, G. PsyToolkit: a software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behav. Res. Methods 42, 1096–1104 (2010).
pubmed: 21139177
doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
Stoet, G. Psytoolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teach. Psychol. 44, 24–31 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/0098628316677643
Conway, A. R. A. et al. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 769–786 (2005).
pubmed: 16523997
doi: 10.3758/BF03196772
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W. J. & Meier, B. The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure. Memory 18, 394–412 (2010).
pubmed: 20408039
doi: 10.1080/09658211003702171
Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Miura, T. K. & Colflesh, G. J. H. Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 33, 615–622 (2007).
pubmed: 17470009
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615
Carver, C. S. & White, T. L. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 319–333 (1994).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. & Kao, C. F. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. J. Pers. Assess. 48, 306–307 (1984).
pubmed: 16367530
doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
Spence, J. T. & Helmreich, R. L. Achievement-related motives and behavior. in Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (ed. Spence, J. T.) 10–74 (WH Freeman, 1983).
Elliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. J. Pers. 78, 865–906 (2010).
pubmed: 20573129
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00636.x
Naylor, F. D. A state‐trait curiosity inventory. Aust. Psychol. 16, 172–183 (1981).
doi: 10.1080/00050068108255893
Elliot, A. J. & Harackiewicz, J. M. Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 461–475 (1996).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 68–81 (2000).
pubmed: 10620382
doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W. & Perry, R. P. Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ. Psychol. 37, 91–105 (2002).
doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Ryan, R. M. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43, 450–461 (1982).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450
Swirsky, L. T., Shulman, A. & Spaniol, J. The interaction of curiosity and reward on long-term memory in younger and older adults. Psychol. Aging 36, 584–603 (2021).
pubmed: 34351185
doi: 10.1037/pag0000623
Brainard, D. H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997).
pubmed: 9176952
doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
Gruber, M. J., Ritchey, M., Wang, S. F., Doss, M. K. & Ranganath, C. Post-learning hippocampal dynamics promote preferential retention of rewarding events. Neuron 89, 1110–1120 (2016).
pubmed: 26875624
pmcid: 4777629
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.017
Haffey, A., Plat, K. T., Mane, P., Blake, A. & Chakrabarti, B. Open source online behavioural experimentation using Collector: Proof of principle & sample size considerations. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3saf (2020).
Yonelinas, A. P. Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 356, 1363–1374 (2001).
pubmed: 11571028
pmcid: 1088520
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0939
Yonelinas, A. P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. J. Mem. Lang. 46, 441–517 (2002).
doi: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
Hasson, U., Furman, O., Clark, D., Dudai, Y. & Davachi, L. Enhanced intersubject correlations during movie viewing correlate with successful episodic encoding. Neuron 57, 452–462 (2008).
pubmed: 18255037
pmcid: 2789242
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.009
Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. (Wiley, New York, 1966).
Snodgrass, J. G. & Corwin, J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117, 34–50 (1988).
pubmed: 2966230
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
Cox, R. W. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29, 162–173 (1996).
pubmed: 8812068
doi: 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014
Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012).
pubmed: 22248573
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021
Fischl, B. et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33, 341–355 (2002).
pubmed: 11832223
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00569-X
Desikan, R. S. et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31, 968–980 (2006).
pubmed: 16530430
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021
Fonov, V. et al. Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage 54, 313–327 (2011).
pubmed: 20656036
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.033
Roopchansingh, V. et al. EPI distortion correction is easy and useful, and you should use it: A case study with toddler data. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.28.306787 (2020).
Wu, C. W. et al. Empirical evaluations of slice-timing, smoothing, and normalization effects in seed-based, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses. Brain Connect. 1, 401–410 (2011).
pubmed: 22432454
doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0018
Pajula, J. & Tohka, J. Effects of spatial smoothing on inter-subject correlation based analysis of FMRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 32, 1114–1124 (2014).
pubmed: 24970023
doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.06.001
Jo, H. J., Saad, Z. S., Simmons, W. K., Milbury, L. A. & Cox, R. W. Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal. Neuroimage 52, 571–582 (2010).
pubmed: 20420926
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.246
Finn, E. S., Corlett, P. R., Chen, G., Bandettini, P. A. & Constable, R. T. Trait paranoia shapes inter-subject synchrony in brain activity during an ambiguous social narrative. Nat. Commun. 9, 2043 (2018).
pubmed: 29795116
pmcid: 5966466
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04387-2
AFNI program: afni_proc.py. https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/program_help/afni_proc.py.html .
Chen, G., Taylor, P. A., Shin, Y. W., Reynolds, R. C. & Cox, R. W. Untangling the relatedness among correlations, Part II: Inter-subject correlation group analysis through linear mixed-effects modeling. Neuroimage 147, 825–840 (2017).
pubmed: 27751943
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.029
Glen, D. R., Taylor, P. A., Buchsbaum, B. R., Cox, R. W. & Reynolds, R. C. Beware (surprisingly common) left-right flips in your MRI data: An efficient and robust method to check MRI dataset consistency using AFNI. Front. Neuroinform. 14, 18 (2020).
pubmed: 32528270
pmcid: 7263312
doi: 10.3389/fninf.2020.00018
Fastrich, G. M., Kerr, T., Castel, A. D. & Murayama, K. The role of interest in memory for trivia questions: An investigation with a large-scale database. Motiv. Sci. 4, 227–250 (2018).
pubmed: 30221181
doi: 10.1037/mot0000087
Goldstein, H., Browne, W. & Rasbash, J. Partitioning variation in multilevel models. Understanding Stat. 1, 223–231 (2002).
doi: 10.1207/S15328031US0104_02
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Esteban, O. et al. MRIQC: Advancing the automatic prediction of image quality in MRI from unseen sites. PLoS One 12, e0184661 (2017).
pubmed: 28945803
pmcid: 5612458
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661
Esteban, O. et al. MRIQC: Advancing the automatic prediction of image quality in MRI from unseen sites. zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4419676 (2021).
Esteban, O. et al. Crowdsourced MRI quality metrics and expert quality annotations for training of humans and machines. Sci. Data 6, 30 (2019).
pubmed: 30975998
pmcid: 6472378
doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0035-4
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142–2154 (2012).
pubmed: 22019881
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018
Woodard, J. P. & Carley-Spencer, M. P. No-reference image quality metrics for structural MRI. Neuroinformatics 4, 243–262 (2006).
pubmed: 16943630
doi: 10.1385/NI:4:3:243
Aliko, S., Huang, J., Gheorghiu, F., Meliss, S. & Skipper, J. I. A naturalistic neuroimaging database for understanding the brain using ecological stimuli. Sci. Data 7, 347 (2020).
pubmed: 33051448
pmcid: 7555491
doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00680-2
Welvaert, M. & Rosseel, Y. On the definition of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio for FMRI data. PLoS One 8, e77089 (2013).
pubmed: 24223118
pmcid: 3819355
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077089
Nastase, S. A. et al. The “Narratives” fMRI dataset for evaluating models of naturalistic language comprehension. Sci. Data 8, 250 (2021).
pubmed: 34584100
pmcid: 8479122
doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01033-3
Visconti di Oleggio Castello, M., Chauhan, V., Jiahui, G. & Gobbini, M. I. An fMRI dataset in response to “The Grand Budapest Hotel”, a socially-rich, naturalistic movie. Sci. Data 7, 383 (2020).
pubmed: 33177526
pmcid: 7658985
doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00735-4
Biswal, B., Yetkin, F. Z., Haughton, V. M. & Hyde, J. S. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537–541 (1995).
pubmed: 8524021
doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340409
Cole, D. M., Smith, S. M. & Beckmann, C. F. Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI data. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4, 8 (2010).
pubmed: 20407579
pmcid: 2854531
Margulies, D. S. et al. Resting developments: a review of fMRI post-processing methodologies for spontaneous brain activity. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 23, 289–307 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s10334-010-0228-5
Yeo, B. T. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011).
pubmed: 21653723
doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011
Gorgolewski, K. J. et al. The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Sci. Data 3, 160044 (2016).
pubmed: 27326542
pmcid: 4978148
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.44
Gorgolewski, K. J. et al. BIDS apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility, and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, 1–16 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209
Bannier, E. et al. The Open Brain Consent: Informing research participants and obtaining consent to share brain imaging data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 42, 1945–1951 (2021).
pubmed: 33522661
pmcid: 8046140
doi: 10.1002/hbm.25351
Meliss, S., Pascua-Martin, C., Skipper, J. & Murayama, K. Magic, Memory, and Curiosity (MMC) fMRI Dataset. Openneuro https://doi.org/10.18112/OPENNEURO.DS004182.V1.0.1 (2023).
Destrieux, C., Fischl, B., Dale, A. & Halgren, E. Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage 53, 1–15 (2010).
pubmed: 20547229
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010
Fischl, B. et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 11–22 (2004).
pubmed: 14654453
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg087
Danek, A. H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B. & Ollinger, M. Aha! experiences leave a mark: Facilitated recall of insight solutions. Psychol. Res. 77, 659–669 (2013).
pubmed: 23007629
doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0454-8
Danek, A. H., Fraps, T., von Müller, A., Grothe, B. & Ollinger, M. Working wonders? investigating insight with magic tricks. Cognition 130, 174–185 (2014).
pubmed: 24300080
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.003
Danek, A. H. & Wiley, J. What causes the insight memory advantage? Cognition 205, 104411 (2020).
pubmed: 32762872
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104411
Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K. & Loderer, K. Surprised-curious-confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration. Emotion 20, 625–641 (2020).
pubmed: 30883147
doi: 10.1037/emo0000578
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903 (2003).
pubmed: 14516251
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
de Sitter, A. et al. Facing privacy in neuroimaging: removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods. Eur. Radiol. 30, 1062–1074 (2020).
pubmed: 31691120
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06459-3
Nastase, S. A. et al. Neural responses to naturalistic clips of behaving animals in two different task contexts. Front. Neurosci. 12, 316 (2018).
pubmed: 29867327
pmcid: 5962655
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00316
Sengupta, A. et al. A studyforrest extension, retinotopic mapping and localization of higher visual areas. Sci. Data 3, 160093 (2016).
pubmed: 27779618
pmcid: 5079119
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.93
Kundu, P., Inati, S. J., Evans, J. W., Luh, W.-M. & Bandettini, P. A. Differentiating BOLD and non-BOLD signals in fMRI time series using multi-echo EPI. Neuroimage 60, 1759–1770 (2012).
pubmed: 22209809
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.028
Liu, T. T. Noise contributions to the fMRI signal: An overview. Neuroimage 143, 141–151 (2016).
pubmed: 27612646
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.008
Power, J. D., Plitt, M., Laumann, T. O. & Martin, A. Sources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans. Neuroimage 146, 609–625 (2017).
pubmed: 27751941
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.038
Liu, X., Zhen, Z., Yang, A., Bai, H. & Liu, J. A manually denoised audio-visual movie watching fMRI dataset for the studyforrest project. Sci Data 6, 295 (2019).
pubmed: 31784528
pmcid: 6884625
doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0303-3
Bartels, A. & Zeki, S. Functional brain mapping during free viewing of natural scenes. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 75–85 (2004).
pubmed: 14755595
doi: 10.1002/hbm.10153
Skipper, J. I., Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H. C. & Small, S. L. Gestures orchestrate brain networks for language understanding. Curr. Biol. 19, 661–667 (2009).
pubmed: 19327997
pmcid: 3767135
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.051
Wagner, D. D., Kelley, W. M., Haxby, J. V. & Heatherton, T. F. The dorsal medial prefrontal cortex responds preferentially to social interactions during natural viewing. J. Neurosci. 36, 6917–6925 (2016).
pubmed: 27358450
pmcid: 4926239
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4220-15.2016
Antony, J. W. et al. Behavioral, physiological, and neural signatures of surprise during naturalistic sports viewing. Neuron 109, 377–390.e7 (2021).
pubmed: 33242421
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.029
Son, J. et al. Evaluating fMRI-based estimation of eye gaze during naturalistic viewing. Cereb. Cortex 30, 1171–1184 (2020).
pubmed: 31595961
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz157
Srirangarajan, T., Mortazavi, L., Bortolini, T., Moll, J. & Knutson, B. Multi-band FMRI compromises detection of mesolimbic reward responses. Neuroimage 244, 118617 (2021).
pubmed: 34600102
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118617
McNabb, C. B. et al. Inter-slice leakage and intra-slice aliasing in simultaneous multi-slice echo-planar images. Brain Struct. Funct. 225, 1153–1158 (2020).
pubmed: 32140847
pmcid: 7166208
doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02053-2
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. & Mendelsohn, A. Real-life neuroscience: An ecological approach to brain and behavior research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 841–859 (2019).
pubmed: 31408614
doi: 10.1177/1745691619856350
Tompary, A., Duncan, K. & Davachi, L. Consolidation of associative and item memory is related to post-encoding functional connectivity between the ventral tegmental area and different medial temporal lobe subregions during an unrelated task. J. Neurosci. 35, 7326–7331 (2015).
pubmed: 25972163
pmcid: 4429149
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4816-14.2015
Taylor, J. R. et al. The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample. Neuroimage 144, 262–269 (2017).
pubmed: 26375206
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.018
Deuker, L. et al. Memory consolidation by replay of stimulus-specific neural activity. J. Neurosci. 33, 19373–19383 (2013).
pubmed: 24305832
pmcid: 6618788
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0414-13.2013
Schapiro, A. C., McDevitt, E. A., Rogers, T. T., Mednick, S. C. & Norman, K. A. Human hippocampal replay during rest prioritizes weakly learned information and predicts memory performance. Nat. Commun. 9, 3920 (2018).
pubmed: 30254219
pmcid: 6156217
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06213-1
Schlichting, M. L. & Preston, A. R. Memory reactivation during rest supports upcoming learning of related content. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15845–15850 (2014).
pubmed: 25331890
pmcid: 4226095
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404396111
Tambini, A., Ketz, N. & Davachi, L. Enhanced brain correlations during rest are related to memory for recent experiences. Neuron 65, 280–290 (2010).
pubmed: 20152133
pmcid: 3287976
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.001
Tambini, A. & Davachi, L. Persistence of hippocampal multivoxel patterns into postencoding rest is related to memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19591–19596 (2013).
pubmed: 24218550
pmcid: 3845130
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308499110
van Kesteren, M. T. R., Fernandez, G., Norris, D. G. & Hermans, E. J. Persistent schema-dependent hippocampal-neocortical connectivity during memory encoding and postencoding rest in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7550–7555 (2010).
pubmed: 20363957
pmcid: 2867741
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914892107
Tambini, A. & Davachi, L. Awake reactivation of prior experiences consolidates memories and biases cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 876–890 (2019).
pubmed: 31445780
pmcid: 6907733
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.008
Varma, S. et al. Non-interfering effects of active post-encoding tasks on episodic memory consolidation in humans. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 11, 54 (2017).
pubmed: 28424596
pmcid: 5372800
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00054
Murty, V. P., Tompary, A., Adcock, R. A. & Davachi, L. Selectivity in Postencoding Connectivity with High-Level Visual Cortex Is Associated with Reward-Motivated Memory. J. Neurosci. 37, 537–545 (2017).
pubmed: 28100737
pmcid: 5242406
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4032-15.2016
Cohen, A. O. et al. Reward Enhances Memory via Age-Varying Online and Offline Neural Mechanisms across Development. J. Neurosci. 42, 6424–6434 (2022).
Nguyen, M., Vanderwal, T. & Hasson, U. Shared understanding of narratives is correlated with shared neural responses. Neuroimage 184, 161–170 (2019).
pubmed: 30217543
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.010
McNabb, C. B. et al. No evidence for a relationship between social closeness and similarity in resting-state functional brain connectivity in schoolchildren. Sci. Rep. 10, 10710 (2020).
pubmed: 32612156
pmcid: 7329826
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67718-8