Impact of non-traditional lipid profiles on 1-year vascular outcomes in ischemic stroke patients with prior statin therapy and LDL-C < 100 mg/dL.
Acute ischemic stroke
LDL-cholesterol
LDL/HDL ratio
Lipid ratio
Non-traditional lipid profiles
Residual cardiovascular risk
Vascular outcome
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
12
06
2024
accepted:
20
09
2024
medline:
2
10
2024
pubmed:
2
10
2024
entrez:
1
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to investigate the association between non-traditional lipid profiles and the risk of 1-year vascular events in patients who were already using statins before stroke and had admission LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. This study was an analysis of a prospective, multicenter, nationwide registry of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke patients who treated with statin before index stroke and LDL-C < 100 mg/dL on admission. Non-traditional lipid profiles including non-HDL, TC/HDL ratio, LDL/HDL ratio, and TG/HDL ratio were analyzed as a continuous or categorical variable. The primary vascular outcome within one year was a composite of recurrent stroke (either hemorrhagic or ischemic), myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios (95% Cis) for 1-year vascular outcomes were analyzed using the Cox PH model for each non-traditional lipid profiles groups. A total of 7028 patients (age 70.3 ± 10.8years, male 59.8%) were finally analyzed for the study. In unadjusted analysis, no significant associations were observed in the quartiles of LDL/HDL ratio and 1-year primary outcome. However, after adjustment of relevant variables, compared with Q1 of the LDL/HDL ratio, Q4 was significantly associated with increasing the risk of 1-year primary outcome (HR 1.48 [1.19-1.83]). For the LDL/HDL ratio, a linear relationship was observed (P for linearity < 0.001). Higher quartiles of the LDL/HDL ratio were significantly and linearly associated with increasing the risk of 1-year primary vascular outcomes. These findings suggest that even during statin therapy with LDL-C < 100 mg/dl on admission, there should be consideration for residual risk based on the LDL/HDL ratio, following stroke.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39354143
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73851-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-73851-5
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
Cholesterol, LDL
0
Lipids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22794Subventions
Organisme : Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute
ID : BCRI24042
Organisme : Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
ID : 2023-ER1006-00
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists, C. et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 380, 581–590 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5
Amarenco, P. et al. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061894 (2006).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061894
pubmed: 16899775
Amarenco, P. et al. A comparison of two LDL cholesterol targets after ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910355 (2020).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910355
pubmed: 31738483
Nesto, R. W. Beyond low-density lipoprotein: addressing the atherogenic lipid triad in type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 5, 379–387. 2005/11/02 (2005).
doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505060-00005
pubmed: 16259526
Di Giorgi, N. et al. A specific plasma lipid signature associated with high triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol identifies residual CAD risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis 339, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.11.013 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.11.013
pubmed: 34801858
Johannesen, C. D. L. et al. Apolipoprotein B and non-HDL cholesterol better reflect residual risk than LDL cholesterol in statin-treated patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 77, 1439–1450. 2021/03/20 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.027
pubmed: 33736827
Liu, X., Yan, L. & Xue, F. The associations of lipids and lipid ratios with stroke: a prospective cohort study. J. Clin. Hypertens. (Greenwich) 21, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13441 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/jch.13441
pubmed: 30461182
Kim, J. T. et al. Admission LDL-cholesterol, statin pretreatment and early outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. J. Clin. Lipidol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2023.08.002 (2023).
Kim, J. T. et al. Statin treatment in patients with stroke with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below 70 mg/dL. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 12, e030738. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030738 (2023).
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030738
pubmed: 37681519
pmcid: 10547296
Kim, B. J. et al. Current status of acute stroke management in Korea: a report on a multicenter, comprehensive acute stroke registry. Int. J. Stroke 9, 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12199 (2014).
Kim, B. J. et al. Case characteristics, hyperacute treatment, and outcome information from the clinical research center for stroke-fifth division registry in South Korea. J. Stroke 17, 38–53 (2015).
doi: 10.5853/jos.2015.17.1.38
pubmed: 25692106
pmcid: 4325643
Adams, H. P. Jr. et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 24, 35–41 (1993).
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35
pubmed: 7678184
Ko, Y. et al. MRI-based Algorithm for Acute ischemic stroke subtype classification. J. Stroke 16, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2014.16.3.161 (2014).
doi: 10.5853/jos.2014.16.3.161
pubmed: 25328874
pmcid: 4200592
Sampson, U. K., Fazio, S. & Linton, M. F. Residual cardiovascular risk despite optimal LDL cholesterol reduction with statins: the evidence, etiology, and therapeutic challenges. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 14, 1. https://doi.org/10.2011/11/22 (2012).
doi: 10.2011/11/22
pubmed: 22102062
pmcid: 3697085
Arsenault, B. J. et al. Beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: respective contributions of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, triglycerides, and the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio to coronary heart disease risk in apparently healthy men and women. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55, 35–41 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.057
pubmed: 20117361
Wen, J. et al. Associations of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and the total cholesterol/HDL-c ratio with arterial stiffness independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in a Chinese population. Hypertens. Res. 42, 1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-019-0251-5 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0251-5
pubmed: 30918334
pmcid: 8075960
Tanaka, F. et al. Predictive value of lipoprotein indices for residual risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden death in men with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels < 120 mg/dl. Am. J. Cardiol. 112, 1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.049 (2013).
Liu, J. et al. Non-high-density lipoprotein and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and their risk predictive values in coronary heart disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 98, 1363–1368 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.032
pubmed: 17134630
Authors/Task Force M Guidelines ESCCfP and Societies ESCNC. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis 290, 140–20520190831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.08.014 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.08.014
Yang, T. et al. Correlation between the triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and other unconventional lipid parameters with the risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in patients with coronary heart disease: a RCSCD-TCM study in China. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 21, 93 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01531-7
pubmed: 35659300
pmcid: 9166647
Sun, T. et al. Predictive value of LDL/HDL ratio in coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 22, 273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02706-6 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02706-6
pubmed: 35715736
pmcid: 9206383
Okuzumi, A. et al. Impact of low-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein ratio on aortic arch atherosclerosis in unexplained stroke. J. Neurol. Sci. 326, 83–88 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.01.019
pubmed: 23414726
Liu, L. et al. Association of LDL-C/HDL-C ratio with stroke outcomes within 1 year after onset: a hospital-based follow-up study. Front. Neurol. 11, 408. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00408 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00408
pubmed: 32499753
pmcid: 7242747
Mora, S. et al. On-treatment non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, and lipid ratios in relation to residual vascular risk after treatment with potent statin therapy: JUPITER (justification for the use of statins in prevention: an intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 59, 1521–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.035 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.035
pubmed: 22516441
pmcid: 3338194
Kleindorfer, D. O. et al. 2021 Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients With stroke and transient ischemic attack: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 52, e364-e467. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000375 (2021).
Liu, Y. et al. Non-traditional lipid profiles and the risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 33, 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2023.01.003 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.01.003
pubmed: 36737357
Deng, Q. W. et al. The short-term prognostic value of the triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in acute ischemic stroke. Aging Dis. 9, 498–506. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2017.0629 (2018).
doi: 10.14336/AD.2017.0629
pubmed: 29896437
pmcid: 5988604
Dahabreh, I. J. & Kent, D. M. Index event bias as an explanation for the paradoxes of recurrence risk research. JAMA 305, 822–823. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.163 (2011).
doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.163
pubmed: 21343582
pmcid: 4115579