Cardiovascular risk factors and development of nomograms in an Italian cohort of patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing SPECT or PET stress myocardial perfusion imaging.
PET
SPECT
cardiovascular risk factors
coronary artery disease
myocardial perfusion imaging
nomogram
pretest
receiver operating characteristic
Journal
Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2673-8880
Titre abrégé: Front Nucl Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918470388806676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
31
05
2023
accepted:
29
01
2024
medline:
2
10
2024
pubmed:
2
10
2024
entrez:
2
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) are non-invasive nuclear medicine techniques that can identify areas of abnormal myocardial perfusion. We assessed the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing SPECT or PET stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Based on significant risk factors associated with an abnormal MPI, we developed a nomogram for each cohort as a pretest that would be helpful in decision-making for clinicians. A total of 6,854 patients with suspected CAD who underwent stress myocardial perfusion imaging by SPECT or PET/CT was studied. As part of the baseline examination, clinical teams collected information on traditional cardiovascular risk factors: age, gender, body mass index, angina, dyspnea, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history of CAD, and smoking. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was different in the two cohorts of patients undergoing SPECT ( Patients with suspected CAD belonging to two different cohorts undergoing SPECT or PET stress myocardial perfusion imaging can have different cardiovascular risk factors associated with a higher risk of an abnormal MPI study. As crude variables, age, gender, and diabetes were significant for both cohorts. Net of the effect of other covariates, age and gender were the only risk factors in common between the two cohorts. Furthermore, smoking and type of stress test were significant for the SPECT cohort, where as diabetes and hypertension were significant for the PET cohort. Nomograms obtained by significant risk factors for the two cohorts can be used by clinicians to evaluate the risk of an abnormal study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39355219
doi: 10.3389/fnume.2024.1232135
pmc: PMC11440955
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1232135Informations de copyright
© 2024 Megna, Petretta, Nappi, Assante, Zampella, Gaudieri, Mannarino, D’Antonio, Green, Cantoni, Panico, Acampa and Cuocolo.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.