STABILITY OF MEDIALLY AND LATERALLY MALPOSITIONED SCREWS: A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY ON CADAVERS.
misplacement
orthopedics
pedicle screws
pull-out strength
spine instrumentation
spine surgery
Journal
The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
ISSN: 1878-1632
Titre abrégé: Spine J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130732
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Sep 2024
30 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
31
01
2024
revised:
07
08
2024
accepted:
14
09
2024
medline:
3
10
2024
pubmed:
3
10
2024
entrez:
2
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Pedicle screw instrumentation is widely used in spine surgery. Axial screw misplacement is a common complication. In addition to the recognized neurovascular risks associated with screw misplacement, the biomechanical stability of misplaced screws remains a subject of debate. The present study investigates whether screw misplacement in the lumbar spine reduces mechanical screw hold. Cadaveric biomechanical study METHODS: Pedicle screw (mis)placement was planned for 12 fresh frozen cadaveric spines between the T12 and the L5 levels. The screws were then implanted into the vertebrae with the help of 3D-printed template guides. Pre- and post-instrumentation computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired for instrumentation planning and quantification of the misplacement. The instrumented vertebrae were potted into CT transparent boxes using Polymethyl methacrylate and mounted on a standardized biomechanical setup for pull-out (PO) testing with uniaxial tensile load. The bone density of all the specimens as per HU was comparable. The predicted pull-out force (POF) for screws medially misplaced by 2mm, 4mm, and 6mm was respectively 985 N (SD 474), 968 N (SD 476) and 822 N (SD 478). For screws laterally misplaced by 2mm, 4mm, and 6mm the POF was respectively 605 N (SD 473), 411 N (SD 475), and 334 N (SD 477). Screws that did not perforate the pedicle (control) resisted pull-out forces of 837 N (SD 471). Medial misplacement is associated with increased axial screw hold against static loads compared to correctly placed screws and laterally placed screws. In clinical settings, the reinsertion of medially misplaced screws should primarily aim to prevent neurological complications while the reinsertion of lateral misplaced screws should aim to prevent screw loosening.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
BACKGROUND
Pedicle screw instrumentation is widely used in spine surgery. Axial screw misplacement is a common complication. In addition to the recognized neurovascular risks associated with screw misplacement, the biomechanical stability of misplaced screws remains a subject of debate.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
The present study investigates whether screw misplacement in the lumbar spine reduces mechanical screw hold.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
METHODS
Cadaveric biomechanical study METHODS: Pedicle screw (mis)placement was planned for 12 fresh frozen cadaveric spines between the T12 and the L5 levels. The screws were then implanted into the vertebrae with the help of 3D-printed template guides. Pre- and post-instrumentation computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired for instrumentation planning and quantification of the misplacement. The instrumented vertebrae were potted into CT transparent boxes using Polymethyl methacrylate and mounted on a standardized biomechanical setup for pull-out (PO) testing with uniaxial tensile load.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The bone density of all the specimens as per HU was comparable. The predicted pull-out force (POF) for screws medially misplaced by 2mm, 4mm, and 6mm was respectively 985 N (SD 474), 968 N (SD 476) and 822 N (SD 478). For screws laterally misplaced by 2mm, 4mm, and 6mm the POF was respectively 605 N (SD 473), 411 N (SD 475), and 334 N (SD 477). Screws that did not perforate the pedicle (control) resisted pull-out forces of 837 N (SD 471).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Medial misplacement is associated with increased axial screw hold against static loads compared to correctly placed screws and laterally placed screws.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
CONCLUSIONS
In clinical settings, the reinsertion of medially misplaced screws should primarily aim to prevent neurological complications while the reinsertion of lateral misplaced screws should aim to prevent screw loosening.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39357743
pii: S1529-9430(24)01023-4
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest One or more authors have financial commitments to disclose. The respective conflict of interest forms (COIs) have been duly submitted.